Essay PreviewMore ↓
My oral introduction was short while my written introduction set the scene with details to introduce my story more formally and substantially. In my oral story I began with where I was and what time it was. In my written version I clearly introduced what time it was, where I was, how I was feeling, and where I was going. For example, "At 3 in morning I grabbed my skateboard and my backpack and left my friend's apartment " While I was talking to my audience I could see their facial expressions and knew they understood and felt it was unnecessary to expand on those details. This is precisely where the structures of written and oral delivery differ. I can gage the reaction of my audience in real-timetheir reactions to my story are instantaneous and visible to methe speaker. Using audience reaction, a speaker can choose to incorporate or leave out certain details that are, perhaps, unavoidably features of a written story. This is not to say that reactions to written work are not instantaneous, for they are, but those reactions are invisible to the author and can only be received in the form of critical or evaluative communication after the fact.
My oral and written body paragraphs tell exactly what happened; however, the written version incorporates the details. My oral version was quickly explained, for example, "About mmm 30 seconds later I just got clothes-lined from the back." My written version is very detailed and informative missing minor details from the experience. For example, "They had funny expressions on their faces as if they weren't quite sure why they were talking to me." Naturally, my written version is more detailed because my audience was not present, and I could not engage in this sort of ongoing perception-of-delivery and re-adjustment process.
The oral version of the story ended abruptly while the written story concluded with everything that happened after the event.
How to Cite this Page
"Oral Vs. Written Communication." 123HelpMe.com. 20 May 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In our English class we had to tell an embarrassing story orally to the entire class. We then made transcripts of our oral story and wrote a descriptive version. Both versions were significantly different from each other in many ways. Our study is on the differences between oral and written communication. When we are speaking and writing to people, content, style, structure and process are all key factors that determine our delivery. My oral introduction was short while my written introduction set the scene with details to introduce my story more formally and substantially.... [tags: Communication Oral Writing]
1439 words (4.1 pages)
- Different Methods of Oral and Written Communication Used in a Business Ikea Oral Ikea use the tannoy system in their store in order to communicate with their employees. They use the tannoy to call the employees to meetings and it is also used to gather the employees in the morning for their daily huddle. These huddles are very useful, and appropriate as they are arranged in order to give out information to the employees, as well as to discuss problems from the previous day and to set targets to overcome these problems from occurring again.... [tags: Papers]
552 words (1.6 pages)
- 1. Which form of communication, oral or written, is most important in each of the following situations. Justify your answers. a. To the patrol officer on a beat To the patrol officer on a beat, oral and written communication are both important in the day to day functions of their job duties.The one that is most important though is oral communication. Oral communication is key for the patrol officer. They are a public servant and need to be able to communicate orally on a daily basis with a diverse group of people that they may encounter.... [tags: Writing, Communication, Nonverbal communication]
1007 words (2.9 pages)
- The bible has two different forms of communicating it’s message to the world. One form being oral communication this is when a person depends mostly on verbal, audio, and some type of visual means of communication. “Verbal communication is the very first form of communication that we read about in the Bible ” (Brown, 2012). When using a form of oral communication such as an audiotape people can replay the sections over and over again. This allows them time to think about what they are hearing and relate this is their own life experiences.... [tags: Writing, Communication, Linguistics]
1069 words (3.1 pages)
- REASONING AND COMMUNICATION The word reasoning comes from the sense of the mind which is closely related to critical thinking. Reasoning can be expressed as the way of making a decision or deciding if a proposed claim is true, partly true, totally untrue or false. Reasoning is an important aspect of our daily life for survival, in educational institutions and in our professions. Reasoning is essential for progression from kindergarten school level to a graduate school level. The definition and meaning are much debated by many educators, but having in these few meanings, It is described as "the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing,... [tags: Communication ]
2011 words (5.7 pages)
- Communication Experiences and Habits Communication is something that we are fortunate to practice everyday. Since literacy has advanced so much in the twenty-first century, there are multiple ways in which communication can be expressed. We are constantly being introduced to new literacy experiences, allowing us to experiment with the written, oral, visual, and electronic modes of communication. It is important to learn about and practice each of these modes in order to grow as a better communicator.... [tags: Communication, Writing, Better, Message]
703 words (2 pages)
- Introduction How we communicate with each other in our current society has changed drastically since social media became our main mode of social interaction with people all over the world. As the popularity of social media grows the way we research and obtain information on specific topics has been affected. As with any other technological advancement, there are advantages and disadvantages, whether it is in how we communicate with one another or how we obtain information about people or specific subject matter.... [tags: Social media, Communication, Information]
1078 words (3.1 pages)
- Oral Language Development Children develop oral language at a very early age. Almost every sound a human being makes can be considered communication. As children grow up, they are constantly observing and practicing communication and oral language. What they know about oral language has an effect on the development of their literacy skills. “Students who had difficulty with early speech communication skills were believed to be at risk for reading…and consequently writing” (Montgomery, 1998). Therefore, the development of oral language has an effect on the ways in which emergent readers develop literacy.... [tags: Talking Speaking Oral Writing Education Essays]
2910 words (8.3 pages)
- Today many people still lack the ability to communicate effectively with in interpersonal relationships. It is through cooperation and collaboration that effective communication occurs. By analyzing and studying the communication process we can improve our ability to communicate effectively between one another. To have a successful interpersonal relationship one must first interact with others, which is called interpersonal communication (Hybels and Weaver pg.156). Recognizing emotions in other is a very important first step to building a relationship.... [tags: Verbal and Non Verbal Communication]
1747 words (5 pages)
- Communication Technology I began brainstorming and searching for products of nature to complete the invention portion of my writing technology assignment. I could not use any of the modern conveniences of writing. This rule totally eliminated the pen, pencil and even nail polish that crossed my mind. I also had to determine a surface for my text considering everything must be natural but not modern. I came up with the idea to use a honeydew and charcoal. The Honeydew would become my surface and the charcoal would become my writing instrument.... [tags: Communication]
718 words (2.1 pages)
Style and structure differs during oral and written communication. The oral and written versions both flow in the same direction without repetition. In the oral version the story flows in one directionwhat exactly happened. There is not much focus on detail and the story never re-tells details. I could tell by the look on people's faces that they were interested in what happened, and I treat the attention of an audience as a gift, not to be taken for granted. There is something about direct social contact, which for me requires this sort of courtesy. Just I as I would not want my time wasted, I seek not to waste the time of others. Just as I would like to hear the fascinating things people have to tell, I would not like them to drone on and on, killing itso to speak. I knew that I needed to keep it short and sweet to reward and to capitalize on that interest. And so it is in part for this reason that the written version flows in a descriptive and detailed styleto keep the reader informed with a more developed understanding of the experience.
The oral version is strung together with coordinators while the written version flows more evenly. In the oral story ideas are conjoined with "uhs, ums, ands, and so's." For example: "and uh about 30 seconds later I just ". There are still coordinators although the story is grammatically correct and flows smoothly. For example, "Eight males were walking in my vicinity with no apparent direction. I was minding my own business when I decided to take a quick glace at them ". If I used more descriptive and attenuated language in a story while speaking to my fellow classmates it would sound unnatural; using the word attenuated would lose about 75% of those kids. I wrote the experience differently because I wanted to develop an interpretation with some depth and let the reader light up something with a stronger sense of truth.
The oral version contains slang and sounds like a natural speaker, while the written version is a thought-out, descriptive story. The oral version contains a different style of vocabulary. In front of the class I used words like "prolly, bout, wanna, takin' a beatin', maybe and not even." The written version contains no slang. I dynamically used descriptive words to help the reader experience the situation. For example, "The night air was cold as ice and the damp fog had rolled in hours before. I was alone " I spoke with slang in the oral version because it felt natural and more in touch with my audience. I wrote the story differently because I felt it was necessary to provide a descriptive story without slang, in order to be taken seriously. While cutting-edge writing today has many forms and styles, it is my feeling that with proper grammar and a more traditional style, more readers will take the writing more seriously. And it goes without saying that with a strong command of the language, the features of experience can be expressed with this sort of traditional and proper language just as efficiently as with slang. Although perhaps there is something lost without the use of slangsome airy, inarticulate essence of today's street or youth culturebut if there is such loss, I'm sure it is minimal and nothing impossible to overcome without that strong command of a more traditional use of the language.
The oral version incorporated social interaction between the storyteller and the audience. The written version tells a descriptive story, lacking the social element. Interaction with the audience was brought into play because I was able to vibe off their reactions and movements. Their facial expressions gave information of how well they understood what I was talking about. In the written version I interacted with the audience by providing descriptive details of what happened. For example, "The moon was out and the stars were not visible." While I was speaking I interacted with the audience by giving eye contact, facial expressions and moving my arms. This method worked because it was natural. I interacted differently while writing because I didn't have a live audienceI provided descriptive details without the non-verbal conventions of communication available during social contact.
We tend to speak in a quicker and less detailed manner because we don't want to lose the attention of the audience and bore them. This is a situation in which time is a factor. Conversely, we write in a comparatively more descriptive way because we don't always know our audience and so we provide details to inform the reader. The audience of a written text can digest significantly more information because of a distinct key structure and that isthey have the ability to digest the information at a rate that they desire. They can put down the text and pick it up later, peruse it at their leisure, or skim it for the vital information. This allows written work to bear a much richer and more textured conversation in which a wealth of detail can be supplied without any concern about the constraints of time.