Presentism is the view that only present objects exist . According to this view; events and entities that are wholly past or wholly future, do not exist.
The ‘present’ in this sense is being used to mean ‘temporally present’ as opposed to ‘spatially present’. Therefore, if a Presentist were to make a list of all things present, I would be on that list as would the Leaning Tower of Pisa, however dinosaurs and the year 3000 would not. This is because the latter lack the property of being present and so according to this view, they are unreal.
An issue that some have found with this is that non-present objects are often talked about, however it is hard to distinguish what people are referring to when they talk about ‘dinosaurs’ and ‘the year 3000’ if no such objects exist, there is also a contentious issue with tensed sentences. Something that is less controversial is the fact that, presently, there are truths about entities from the past. Presentists and Eternalists disagree as to whether dinosaurs, a past entity, exist. However, they are in agreement that ‘dinosaurs existed’ is true. Eternalists have no issue in accounting for such claims to be true as dinosaurs are the truthmaker (the tru...
... middle of paper ...
... the past up ‘til the present moment.
The present moment, according to this view, divides the past from nothingness.
However, issues arise with this view. If only the past and the present exist and not the future, it’s possible that those in the past believe they are at ‘the edge of the block’, meaning we would not exist to them as we are in the relative future. This is comparative with us now as we believe we are currently at ‘the edge of the block’, however we could be someone else’s past.
To summarise while Presentism provides a good argument to suggest that only the present time exists, I found it to be weaker than the arguments offered by the Growing Block Theory and Eternalism as I found that these views are much more compelling and lead me to conclude that; the past, present and the future all exist. Therefore, I am in agreement with the Eternalist argument.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Reality of the Future: Probabilistic Potentialities How can time be unreal if humans can both perceive and conceive of it. Does time exist outside of human minds at all. If time is singularly linear, that is, there is only one future, what’s the purpose of any human action. Contemplating the nature of the future often leads to ostensible paradoxes. To Aristotle, the future only existed potentially, not actually, because it was impossible to determine true and false statements about the future.... [tags: Time, Future, Present, Past]
1222 words (3.5 pages)
- The Last Question by Asimov depicts its narrative through a short story and utilizes time in one direction. Asimov is a proponent of the ingenuity of man moving forward, the end of the world is a natural problem and as time goes on man is more and more equipped along with AC to solve the issue. In La Jetee, Marker blurs the lines of film and literature through the use a photo novel. Marker uses a bidirectional timeline that is cyclical and capable of trapping man as opposed to only moving forward.... [tags: Time, Time travel, Future, Past]
1458 words (4.2 pages)
- The Essence of Reality We all know the old adage, if a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound. We take it as a fun riddle, or a topic to start conversation at a party, but in reality it is the tip of the iceberg of the complex theories on the perception of reality. It explores the idea of object permanence, and if there is no outside observer, how can we know at all if the tree exists without us. These questions cloud what we think about reality, and make us wonder how our own perspective can affect it.... [tags: Brain, Human brain, Reality, Ontology]
1414 words (4 pages)
- Why do people choose to live in the past rather than pursue a possibly greater future. This can occur due to a fear of the coming days, months, and years ahead that await. People would rather think and engross themselves in memories then have any sense of direction for the the inevitable passing of time. While every age is unique, “The Collective Neurosis” states the problems that can arise from not believing that people can escape, improve, or adapt to their environment. A person’s environment can be described by where they live and grew up, their socioeconomic status, and even their current mental state.... [tags: Time, Future, Present, Past]
1056 words (3 pages)
- The basis of the story the narrator wishes to write is the idea of the fabrication of letters that he will sell for money, the premise actually coming from the original proposal that Lerner wrote for the book that came to be 10:04. This story, which is based on a story that the narrator hears from his old professor, is an actual truth, turned into fiction, but is ultimately cut from the story (Lerner 37). Instead of focusing explicitly on the way that fiction functions as a type of fraudulent activity, Lerner and the narrator want to spin the ‘real’ details of life into something that is “just as it is now – the room, the baby, the clothes, the minutes – just a little different” (Lerner 54).... [tags: Future, Present, Time, Past]
2152 words (6.1 pages)
- i. It was a rainy afternoon in Seattle when he left her at the Crossroads of Time for the second time. Veda didn’t start to worry until she counted to three million, seven hundred and eighty-four. Then she lost count, again. She began to wonder if Layke was coming back for her. They had another fight, about the unwashed dishes or the unorganized closet or the tall blonde she’d kissed on Saturday night at the Days Inn or any number of little annoyances that seemed to continue to pile up. But she knew that in a long-term relationship with a Time Traveler, things became challenging on occasion.... [tags: Time, Future, Present, Past]
1460 words (4.2 pages)
- Introduction If you got a second chance at life would you live it. If for some miracle life was given back to you, would you accept it with open arms. Would you find your wings and dive to earth with a smile on your face. What about you. Yes, you. How would you feel about a second chance. Would it be meaningful to you, or would it just be another absolute right. I have loads of questions for him. He who’s name shall remain unknown. Yes, I decided on my own will that he is definitely a boy. How could he not be.... [tags: Time, Future, Present, Past]
711 words (2 pages)
- Final Paper Pick a particular argument in one of the articles and examine it closely McTaggart 's argument that time is unreal Introduction McTaggart thinks he has found a problem with the idea of time which is that the existence of time in itself is a contradiction and he argues that appearances of temporal order are just appearances. In his Argument he has two parts the first part is that time revolves around change and he introduces A- series, and the second part of the argument is that A- series is contradictory and leads to an infinite regress and that B- series Alone Does not account for change.... [tags: Time, Future, Present, Past]
2020 words (5.8 pages)
- Albert Einstein once said that, "Time is an illusion". Many people interpret that figuratively and end up thinking that he means the time is what you make of it or a different philosophical concept of time, but Einstein meant it quite literally. Einstein meant that time as we know it is not real. There are many reasons why time is not real and some of these include the fundamental properties of time, the relativity of time, how time is determined on a universal scale, and how time is used. One of the many reasons why time is not tangible is due to the fundamental properties of time.There are 3 main properties associated with time and these are a present moment that is special; some kind of... [tags: Time, Present, Future, Past]
742 words (2.1 pages)
- Arguing For the Literate Future Writer, Anna Quindlen, in her argumentative essay, “Reading Has a Strong Future.” Informs how the introduction of E-Readers is changing the perspective many have towards physical books. Quindlen’s purpose is to convey the idea written books are a thing of the past, is inaccurate and that while they will continue to thrive, E-readers are reaching people in far more communicative ways. Quindlen effectively creates not only an emotional response within her audience by building an argument, drawing statistics to increase her credibility, and involving the audience which consists of American readers.... [tags: Audience theory, Audience, Question, Paragraph]
732 words (2.1 pages)