The Ontological Argument brings about the conclusion of a god’s existence through the framework of the mind, in that all people maintain some concept of a god. However, the Cosmological Argument derives the answer from the perspective of what created the universe. The primary question that the Cosmological Argument is trying to answer is what is the uncaused first cause of the universe, or what began the world. The Cosmological Argument has based the belief that the creation of everything in the universe is contingent upon something else, and it is an infinite cycle until the uncaused first cause. Anselm develops the Ontological Argument from a much different perspective than how Aquinas developed the Cosmological Argument.
The base premise of the Ontological Argument is that god is the best thing thinkable. This is a concept that is understood by both atheists and theists. If atheists and theists did not agree that a god is the best thing thinkable, Anselm’s argument would fall apart long before it gained any traction....
... middle of paper ...
...ng thinkable, which is commonly agreed to be god.
At some point or another, every person has pondered the existence of a god, and Anselm and Aquinas both do a good job arguing for the existence of some higher power. Each argument views the problem from a different perspective, but still manages to come to the same conclusion that a god or best thing thinkable or the uncaused first cause exists. Anselm may have minor flaws in the logical progression of his argument, but he still manages to lead to the conclusion of god’s existence. The perspective taken by Anselm is one that is difficult to follow, but when the argument is laid out in standard form and read over many times his thoughts begin to make sense. Anselm 's argument is not circular but instead, each premise leans on the previous premises to lead to the conclusion that the best thing thinkable or a god exists.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Student #: 1001725779 TA: Michel S. Tutorial: 10am St. Anselm discovers the ontological argument and he presents an argument that supports Gods existence. In this essay, I will consider the main argument that Anselm states, and list explanations that results in the uncertainty of God’s existence. This essay will critique Anslems argument by using Gaunilo idea of the perfect island and include a priori and a posteriori to show the problematic areas of Anslems argument. We begin with the explanation of Anslems argument.... [tags: Existence, Ontology, Cosmological argument]
943 words (2.7 pages)
- St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas were considered as some of the best in their period to represent philosophy. St. Anselm’s argument is known as the ontological argument; it revolves entirely around his statement, “God is that, than which no greater can be conceived” (The Great Conversation, Norman Melchert 260). St. Thomas Aquinas’ argument is known as the cosmological argument; it connects the effects of events to the cause for why they happened. Anselm’s ontological proof and Aquinas’ cosmological proof both argued for God’s existence, differed in the way they argued God’s existence, and had varying degrees of success using these proofs.... [tags: Ontology, Existence, Anselm of Canterbury]
794 words (2.3 pages)
- 1. Craig’s “Kalam Cosmological Argument” is based on three main premises. The first premise being that everything which begins to exist requires a cause. The second premise is the universe began to exist. The last premise is that the universe requires a cause. In order to infer from this that the universe has a cause of its existence, the advocate of the Kalam cosmological argument needs to show that the past is finite, that the universe began to live at a definite time. Scientists gathered verification that the universe started with the big bang, which means it must have a root, specifically God.... [tags: Existence, Ontology, Existence of God]
1009 words (2.9 pages)
- It is important to show why the topic you are discussing is important, especially if there are other topics that could be studied in place of the one you are discussing. In this case, the discussion is on Saint Anselm and his Ontological Argument. There have been other arguments made before Saint Anselm on God's existence, and the first paragraph will show why it is important to study this particular argument. Then the argument itself is given and discussed. And just like most arguments in the field of philosophy, the Ontological Argument has an objection.... [tags: Philosophy]
959 words (2.7 pages)
- Most people have not witnessed or experienced God and therefore are confused about its existence. In Western theology, three theories have emerged to demonstrate the existence of God. These theories are the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. St. Anselm of eleventh century, and Descartes of seventeenth century, have used the ontological argument for proving the existence of God. The God, for them, is supreme, "needing nothing outside himself, but needful for the being and well-being of all things." (Pg.... [tags: essays research papers]
2908 words (8.3 pages)
- The Ontological Argument is an argument that claims the existence of God through the meaning of words and the idea of logic. Ontological literally means ‘concerned with being’. The argument concludes that the definition of God ultimately infers his existence, and Anselm, who was the main proponent of the argument argued that the existence of God was logically necessary due to the definition of God – ‘that which nothing greater can be conceived’. The main proponents of this argument are Anselm, Descartes, Malcolm, and Platinga and the main opponents are Aquinas, Kant, and Gaunilo.... [tags: Ontology, Existence, Metaphysics, Atheism]
1026 words (2.9 pages)
- The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas Descartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, developed Anselm’s argument, in attempting to prove God’s existence from simply the meaning of the word ‘God’. The ontological argument is a priori argument, such arguments use logic to prove an initial definition to be correct. The basis of these arguments depends upon one’s understanding of the nature of God. Anselm’s definition of God being “a supremely perfect being”, is the basis of his argument.... [tags: Papers]
965 words (2.8 pages)
- Among the three arguments to prove God's existence, I find Aquinas's cosmological argument well-grounded in empirical evidence, and that the focus on simple facts proves acceptable in both historical and scientific dimensions. Aquinas starts by stating the preliminary matter that God's existence is not self-evident, and therefore we need to examine God's effects, which we are able to observe, to prove God's existence, although we are not able to understand God's nature perfectly. Aquinas provides five ways demonstrate the existence of a transcendent being through empirical evidence.... [tags: Existence of God]
836 words (2.4 pages)
- Anselm's Ontological Argument and the Philosophers Saint Anselm of Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury, perhaps during a moment of enlightenment or starvation-induced hallucination, succeeded in formulating an argument for God's existence which has been debated for almost a thousand years. It shows no sign of going away soon. It is an argument based solely on reason, distinguishing it from other arguments for the existence of God such as cosmological or teleological arguments. These latter arguments respectively depend on the world's causes or design, and thus may weaken as new scientific advances are made (such as Darwin's theory of evolution).... [tags: essays research papers fc]
2006 words (5.7 pages)
- The dilemma of the existence of God has troubled mankind for thousands of years. Many philosophers have put forth their theories in order to prove the existence of God. Most of these arguments can be termed as ontological. These arguments differ from other arguments for the existence of God since they are not based on empirical data such as the existence or nature of the universe, but are rather grounded in pure logic. First we will consider the arguments presented by Anselm. He believed that God is ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’; if one understand this, then God exists in his mind; but it is greater to exist in reality as well as in the mind than to exist only in the min... [tags: Ontological arguments]
914 words (2.6 pages)