Education may have many functions, from the development of better civic-minded individuals to personal enrichment, but in a capitalist society one of its core functions is the quantifiable increase in human capital that it brings. Though not every person chooses a degree for economics, even relatively cheap education directly trades off with the possibility of time at work. Therefore, the current state of the economy will impact choices to whatever extent for education. In specific, the labor market, both technological and sociological shifts that alter the way business is done change skill requirements, changing global and regional competition that might alter the comparative advantage of a country or region.
It is first important to remember that not every person is completely economically rational or informed when choosing a degree. Some people may be going to school because they are being pushed to by family members or loved ones, because they want to personally enrich themselves, or otherwise are going to school for a reason that does not have to do with a rational calculation of utility. Another group of students will be attending to go to the work that they want, not the work that is necessarily the highest paying job that they could be trained to do. This would certainly be true of many people choosing to go into academia, counseling, social work or other service professions. Yet others may be trying to make an economically rational choice but do not have the informed capability to do. So they may, for example, erroneously believe that businesses want an MBA when there is actually a glut of MBAs.
The latter group may be perhaps the most important for understanding the relation between the economy and education. There ma...
... middle of paper ...
...e, while economics are certainly important, so too is the social belief in the efficacy of a degree.
It is certainly true, as Mead puts it in “Learning by Degrees”, that, “Unaddressed in that calculus is any question of what else an education might be for: to nurture critical thought; to expose individuals to the signal accomplishments of humankind; to develop in them an ability not just to listen actively but to respond intelligently”. But while this is a fine sentiment, it is also economically naïve. If society does not put its literal and proverbial money where its mouth is and actually support the ability of its citizens to get an education for goals beyond economics, many will no matter what the level of intellectual and civic culture, find themselves unwilling to spend enough money to purchase a house merely to have intangibles like “critical thought” (Mead).
In his article “ Is College a Sucker Bet? ” Dave Maney (2013) is concerned that colleges value is lowering due to our era being “ A world of internet-enabled ”. The cost of college is still rising, but is it truly worth paying for due to internet savvy users decreasing the value and advantages that a college educated graduate would usually have. It then start to say that those with college degrees usually make higher incomes, but whenever the topic is brought up it is always met with an argument, but today it still is proven that those with college degrees earn more money. “ Just because statistics show that those with a degree earn more than those without doesn’t mean the acquisition of a college degree causes the difference”. That just means there is a connection.
The human capital, as what sociologists and economists call it, is accumulating all throughout the years in school. The educational system not only helps young people discover what they want to further pursue in life, but gives them skills and knowledge for that end occupational goal (348). With respect to the skills and knowledge received, schooling offers credentialism for students that particular jobs look for which is another reason human capital is a key role in U.S economic growth in the 20th century.
The value of a college degree is as high as it has ever been, maybe even more so now with the emergence of a more service oriented economy, in which a college
The biggest question or dispute regarding the cost of higher education is finding the appropriate monetary and economical equation to determine the percentage of personal and public responsibility. The above debate has been in question since the 1800’s when Thomas Jefferson stated; "I think by far the most important bill in our whole code is that for the diffusion of knowledge among the people. No other sure foundation can be devised, for the preservation of freedom and happiness ”. Those important words that called attention to the importance of having an educated citizenry in order to preserve democracy are until this day, words by which legislator...
"College graduates earn more than one million dollars more than high school graduates over their lifetimes." Every teenager has been bombarded with this much-cited statistic in the hope that it will convince him or her to intend a university after high school. But, is it actually the university education that leads to the inequity in salaries between college and high school graduates? Superficial reasoning would suggest yes. It is obvious that the additional education increases the college graduate's human capital and maybe this does lead to greater productivity and higher wages. However, this only seems probable if you ignore what universities actually teach. The majority of what is taught at universities will be of no use to their graduates in their future careers. If the purpose of a college education was to increase relevant work-related skills they would look more like vocational schools where students would specialize in particular skills relevant for their future careers, rather than studying small amounts of every subject. Instead, to a large extent, the purpose of college is to act as a costly signaling mechanism to assist employers in screening employees. A college education is more about showing off than acquiring useful job skills. However, this showing off comes at an enormous price. We waste billions of dollars per year on this showing off, not to mention the four years of someone's life. These tremendous social costs require us to rethink hiring practices and how universities serve their students.
In order to break through the status quo of poverty for generations, there needs to be more efficiency on education. In our current society, establishments would rather hire someone who well qualified with college degree rather than just a high school education. For our modern day survival we need education because it will give up opportunities and help we need to become successful. The higher a person educational degree the more invested opportunity to move up in the ranks in our
A college degree is one of the best educations that a person can get. It not only develops your mind, but it helps to develop you as a person as well. No matter what kind of degree you receive, whether it be a bachelors, associates, or masters you are more likely to get a better job than without it or with just a high school diploma. Workers with a college degree will earn much more and are much less likely to be unemployed than those with only a high school diploma. This paper will argue that with a college degree you are more likely to get a higher paying job than without a degree. I will support this argument with multiple scholarly articles and other valid sources to further convince you.
Making basic education available provides the conditions for a well-informed population so that we can maintain a society comprised of individuals who have the basic skills required to join the labor force. In particular, an education that provides skills to serve the labor market is vital for individuals, the economy and our society. The reason we continue to subsidize higher education is to produce benefits beyond those that arise from the student through training and
Both authors want what is best for society overall, which in their views are individuals that are “socially well-adjusted and educated citizens who are industrious…[and] benefit society” (Ray par. 1) by creating a stronger work force. This issue is not only important for each student’s future, but over time it has become a focus of parents as they try to ensure the absolute best education for their child. As Cox found, “an increasing number of parents are recognizing the battle that is waged for their children’s hearts and minds” (Cox p. 34) and it is important that their children are equipped with the best hearts and minds so they can effectively function in society. Both of the authors for these articles acquired advanced education which may explain their bias toward the importance of education. However, evidence shows that education is one of the factors responsible for the success of a nation. Workers, who after graduation are able to “enter the working world equipped with the same basic education,” have a step up from those who were not able to fulfill those educational standards. While society says that it values education, it is apparent that actions are not being seriously taken by the educated population to effectively keep public education as a focus in policy holder’s hands.
It makes their family’s life become tough. They raise a question that why not letting these students go to work instead of this worthless education. As what is mentioned in the article “College degree still worth the investment, data suggest”, the author Mary Beth Marklein shows many evidences to support her main idea that the college education is still worth to invest because it can give college graduates higher wages. She showed the audiences a data, which pointed out that college graduates earned generally 56% higher that people who only have a high school diploma in the past four years. The author also said, “From 1982 to 2001, bachelor 's degree holders earned an average 80% more and associate 's degree-holders almost 30% more than workers with no more than a high school diploma”. The similar contents are also presented in the article “Median Salary Up Two Percent for Higher Education Professionals”. The author insists that the higher degree you get, the higher salary you will earn. In other word, it’s the truth that the college students might have heavy loans when they decided to go to college, but they
Many people these days tend to believe that the higher the degree they earn the more money they will make. Thus far the more successful they will one day be. Although in some instances that may be true, that is not always the case. For example, my aunt graduated from
We all know there is high encouragement to attend college already; not to mention receiving a Bachelor’s Degree is the norm today, however we know that isn’t working for those that don’t feel college is for them. Our educational system should focus on steering students equally towards Community and Technical Colleges. I’m not the only one that thinks this way though, some progressive education reformers are moving towards this idea which they call a more intellectual version of “career and technical education,” or CTE. Samuel Lucas, a University of California sociologist and an author explains matters further when he writes, “You can teach any given subject at multiple levels. You can teach people how to fix a car where you talk about turning the screw. At that level of knowledge they could get a job. But you could also teach them, well, what are the principles by which this combustion engine is working?” (qtd. By Dana Goldstein). In other words Samuel is trying to say that teaching a student technical skills is sufficient for a job, but if you teach them to understand what they do they are that much stronger as an individual in the future workforce of a globalized world. In that way let’s decrease the stigma of Community and Technical Colleges so we can embrace the student’s curiosity and passion along with their IQ. Friedman knows how much it matters, he calculates, “For all these reasons I have concluded that in a flat world, IQ- intelligence quotient –still matters, but CQ and PQ-curiosity quotient and passion quotient –matter even more” (314). In other words America has stressed traditional ways of educating for a long time, but in this new flat world we are going to find out that CQ and PQ are going to outweigh IQ with creative minds to innovate. This is a problem mostly with the stigma attached to Technical Colleges because that is where the curiosity and passion of
Many people dream of finishing college for the possibility of attaining a great career with wonderful wages. Nowadays, however, people are more concerned with the amount of debt they will gain after attending college. This money problem skews people 's opinion of going to college, and they try to avoid being in debt as much as possible. As a result, more people steer away from the college life and enter into the work force without a degree. These people, however, do not understand that the college experience, knowledge, and the degree they gain are worth any amounts of money. College education is priceless.
With the global economy relying more than ever on brainpower and innovation rather than raw materials and manual labour as generators of wealth, a good education has become the key factor determining who will succeed and who will be left behind.
The causality link between education and economic growth and development is undeniable. The economic gains from an improved human capital are immense. Education can help harness the immense potential LDCs have and thus become a global imperative for human development.