McCloskey dives right into the meat of his article by addressing what he refers to as “proofs” he claims were put forth by theists. I think that it is imperative to know the difference between a “proof” and an argument. A proof contains a note of certainty. It suggests that something can be known to be 100% truth. In one of the recent PointCast presentations, Dr. Foreman insists that we cannot know any with a complete certainty that we have absolute truth about the existence of God. Therefore these ideas should be put forth as arguments and not as proofs. In fact, if looking at it the other way, he cannot know for certain that his ideas are correct. If he uses his rebuttals to the theist’s arguments, they seem contradictory several times. As we have no absolute certainty for either side, we are left then to find the best possible explanation. This is widely used in cases where things simply cannot be known for certain such as the example of the black hole that Dr. Foreman used. Science can’t fully expl...
... middle of paper ...
...have had to adopt a way to avoid living pointless, meaningless lives. Craig calls it the Noble Lie that they live under. Ultimately, McCloskey, were he to win his arguments would have to face the conclusion that there is no point to this universe that we are in, no point to life. Fighting for the self-reliance and the self-respect he finds in this fight gives him some sort of short term purpose to the life that he lives here on earth.
Craig, William Lane. Reasonable Faith Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd Ed.,
Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2008.
Evans, C. Stephen and R. Zachary Manis. Philosophy of Religion, 2nd Ed. Downers
Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2009.
McCloskey, H.J. “On Being an Atheist,” Question 1 (February 1968): 51-54
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the article “On Being an Atheist”, H. J. McCloskey tries to show that believing in God is unreasonable. McCloskey first tries to point out flaws in theism by trying to disprove the cosmological and the teleological arguments. After trying to show the flaws in the two argument he brings up the problem of evil to try to discredit theism as a self-contradictory belief. At the end of his article he tries to show his readers that atheism is comforting and that theism is not. When you go through McCloskey’s argument it shows many flaws in his reasoning as he wanted to show that it is impossible that there is a God.... [tags: response paper]
1271 words (3.6 pages)
- In the article “ On Being an Atheist,” H.J. McCloskey attempts to inform his readers that the belief in atheism is a “much more comfortable belief” by effectively using a disdainful rhetoric towards theists and their faith. McCloskey delves into both the Cosmological and Teleological arguments, which within he criticizes the arguments and to further his argument against theism, he also presents the Problem of Evil and why evil cannot possibly exist with a perfect God being the creator of universe.... [tags: Response, Breakdown, Arguments]
1244 words (3.6 pages)
- McCloskey in his article, "On Being An Atheist" claims that proofs or arguments which theists provide to support their belief “have no weight”. He speaks of this primarily in relation to the ontological argument, the argument which attempts to show that the very concept of God implies his reality. McCloskey believes that there is no point in debating on this particular proof because it has no bearing but the ontological argument serves as the very foundation for other arguments which supports and defends God’s existence.... [tags: Refutation to H. J. McCloskey]
1606 words (4.6 pages)
- In his article, "On Being an Atheist" Mccloskey gives a few contentions that look to support the non-presence of God, Atheism. This he does utilizing a few cases made by theists on a general level and in addition centering all the more on the Christian God. The cases are isolated into a few segments whereupon he lays his countering contentions. At the presentation, he gives a concise review of the contentions exhibited by theists, who he alludes to as "confirmations," guaranteeing that none of the evidences make enough avocation to accept that God does exist.... [tags: god, malevolent world, atheism]
1676 words (4.8 pages)
- H J McCloskey intelligently put his thoughts together and shared his beliefs in his article called “On Being an Athiest” addressing some key arguments discussed in atheism and theism from an atheistic point of view. He makes no apologies for bringing up a difficult topic and for trying to argue persuasively for his views. He makes a great point when he states, “…I make no apology for doing so, as it is useful for us to remind ourselves of the reasons for and virtues of our beliefs (50).” Whether a theist or an atheist we should know what we believe and why we believe what we believe.... [tags: philosophy, atheism, theism, belief]
1361 words (3.9 pages)
- For over a millennia, philosophers and theologians alike have disputed the existence of God. From my perspective, it seems as though the atheists are on the attack against theists in the hopes to disprove the existence of God so that they find some comfort in their bleak outlook on mankind’s existence. McCloskey, an outspoken atheist, wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist” in which he examined and tried to disprove three arguments that he believed convinced many theists of God’s existence.... [tags: On Being an Athiest, McCloskey]
1345 words (3.8 pages)
- The article “On Being an Atheist” by H.J. McCloskey provides much insight into the atheistic viewpoint. It provides comparison to the opposing theistic perspective pertaining to the existence of God. It argues for the reasons and virtues behind the belief of atheism to prove its superiority over theism as a source of strength. In the essay, McCloskey refers to arguments like the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and arguments from design as proofs. He argues that since there is no evidence to prove these arguments to be true, therefore they aren’t and for that reason the idea of the mere existence of God should be removed from our thinking.... [tags: On Being an Athiest, H.J. McCloskey]
1474 words (4.2 pages)
- H.J. McCloskey published the article called “On Being an Atheist” in February of 1968. In this article he talks about why atheists believe that there is no God and why the existence of God fails to be the truth. This article responds to the arguments that McCloskey and how the argument he has made has had no case to help with the existence of God. He will also explain why he believes why theism is better than theists. To show how it is a bit more reasonable he uses a “proof” instead of using a “theory” to help explain his argument.... [tags: Theology, God, Atheism, Deism]
1793 words (5.1 pages)
- Today I would like to respond to H. J. McCloskey’s article entitled, “On Being an Atheist.” In his article, McCloskey gives several of his atheistic opinions and criticizes the theistic position. As a theist myself, McCloskey perspective somewhat alarmed me. I find it difficult to believe that someone could wholeheartedly deny the existence and love of God. I know atheist who have converted, who have stated that deep down in their heart, they knew that their views were wrong. Could that be the case for McCloskey.... [tags: article response, religion, athiesm]
1369 words (3.9 pages)
- McCloskey in "On Being an Atheist" argues in favor of atheism and attempts to discredit theism. He uses many tactful approaches in disputing theism such as the arguments for God as a whole failing to establish a case for God. Focusing on the Cosmological argument, McCloskey claims that the existence of all that we see fulfills no grounds for there to exist a God or necessary being. He furthers the argument by stating that the cosmological argument gives us, as humans, no right to assume that a necessary being or God exists.... [tags: God, Cosmology, Reflection]
1546 words (4.4 pages)