Oedipus the King

1690 Words4 Pages

The tragedy of Sophocles’ Oedipus the King is not only that of a man exposing the horrific truth behind his past. The greatest tragedy is the ever-changing perception of Oedipus, by both the citizens of Thebes, and the play’s audience. Oedipus exudes a gross amount of self-confidence and ego, leading to narrow vision with no room for the perspectives of Tiresias, Jocasta or Creon, thus insuring his own demise. By the end of the play, the audience, along with the other characters, can track the personality flaws that led Oedipus to his personal, living-hell. But the context of the play’s and Oedipus’ history, along with his unfortunate traits, actually highlight another aspect to his character. That aspect is the fact that Oedipus’ incredible ego was completely deserved. His overwhelming self-confidence that some would perceive as destructive and unnecessary, is a product of being the true manifestation of his own self-image. It was the qualities that led him to be the savior and ruler of Thebes that led him to his terrible confrontation with fate, not qualities that were a result of being a ruler. The first portion of the play is devoted to addressing the fact that Oedipus has an enormous ego. He introduces himself, “Here I am myself- you all know me, the world knows my fame. I am Oedipus” (7-9). This introduction is not for the benefit of the audience as they are already all too familiar with the legend of Oedipus. This is less of a practical introduction of the titular character and more of an establishment of one of his core characteristic, that being his self-confidence. Ironically, the “world” and the “fame” that Oedipus speaks of are completely different to those of the play’s audience. The world knows Oedipus for his gre... ... middle of paper ... ...out a child” (1644-1647). Oedipus uses the phrase “not a man on earth”, repeated from Jocasta earlier in the play when she disputes the idea of men predicting the future. So in this brief moment of speculation, Oedipus has shown again that he has moved from absolute self-determination, but not completely, as he only has moved partially towards the mindset of predetermination. Oedipus has a foot in both worlds. Sophocles has written a play that walks an ambiguous line as to whether one can live with or without freewill. But he has written the character of Oedipus to embody not one single position on the matter, but as a classically tragic hero, who leads and saves at the cost of his own and others’ suffering. Oedipus did not lead himself to his own downfall out of any personal faults, but because it was what he had to do in order to be the King that Thebes needed.

Open Document