The Objectives Of Regulatory Administrative Agencies

1037 Words3 Pages

The objectives of regulatory administrative agencies is to standardize and make rules in the public as well as private sector, and are considered quasi-governmental agencies since they operate separate from the subdivisions of the executive branch. The “sine qua non” in government is itemized as the preservation of the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (McDonald "Regulatory Policy."). Regulatory activity is part of the structure for preserving those rights. Apparatuses to reserve the security of rights are designed to safeguard them from threat of diminution, attrition, or obsolescence. Regulatory activities hunt for to strut up that which is weak but deemed worthy of preservation. While executive agencies are perceived by most people to be run by unidentifiable bureaucrats that have minute impact on the lives of people, these agencies have a implausible presence in the everyday functions of the people in the form of regulation of the food that is consumed, the vehicles that are driven each day, consumer merchandises that are purchased, programming available on television, and even air quality. The regulatory administrative agencies ragger the impression of the president as a chief executive in that the president can only fire them on sporadic occasions.
What 's more, in 1935 the U.S. Supreme Court sheltered the independence of these kinds of agencies when in the example Humphrey 's Executor v. United States, the Supreme Court held that President Franklin D. Roosevelt surpassed his authority in dismissing a member of a regulatory commission without legitimate cause ("Humphrey 's Executor v. United States"). Over and above 50 years later, the Supreme Court recapitulated this leitmotif in Morrison ...

... middle of paper ...

...34, and by June 1934, it was on his desk for him to sign. The act created a new regulatory agency that would oversee telecommunications policy in the United States. Prior to the act, oversight was shared between the Department of Commerce and the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). With this act, the shared oversight was now combined into the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and it was charged to act in the "public interest," a term that was not defined by Congress or the president and still varies today. (Christopher S. "Telecommunication Policy").
In conclusion in order to stop these malicious agencies congress has to make laws specifying the powers of the regulatory administrative agencies. Also the president has to know who he is appointing, and knows when to stop these agencies when they get out of hand and perform like a proper chief executive.

More about The Objectives Of Regulatory Administrative Agencies

Open Document