The Nuremberg Trials was unethically run and violated the rights of the Nazi leaders who were convicted of committing crimes against humanity. Primarily because the Allies sought to use the trials as a way to remind the Germans, who won the war ‘again’. Thus making it similar to the Treaty of Versailles in (19- ), through implying this notion of “Victors’ Justice”. Nevertheless, the Allies did to an extent ‘try’ to make the tribunal as ethical as possible, through establishing a Charter to use during the trials.
Even, through the American and and British power’s allocating the Soviet Union, was another huge mistake. This is because the leader of the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin was renowned for tampering tribunals, so that it ended with a good execution. On top of this, the Chief American Prosecutor, Robert Jackson used the data that the American troops collected as propaganda to illustrate to the globe of the evil nature of the Germans and Nazi Party, during the war. As a result of all these factors the Nuremberg War Crime Trials in 1945 – 1946, were defiantly a representation of “Victors’ Justice” for the Allies after World War II.
When the war ended in 1945, the Allies believed that it was their responsibility as the victors to deal with the Germans. Therefore, putting the head leaders of the Nazi Party on trial, demonstrating to the world who were the real criminals during the war. Implicitly the Nuremberg Trial was organized by the Allied ...
... middle of paper ...
...r worse. Though this dispute was all put to rest when America and Britain choose the Soviets to run the tribunal. From the two Allied powers choosing the Soviets, the Nuremberg Trial inevitably became a ‘show trial’. As a result of this, any further planning by the Allies to make the tribunal more just for the convicted Nazi Leaders was all done in vain. Especially when the Allies hired the Chief American Prosecutor, Robert Jackson to create a set of legislation which would be used to judge the Nazi leaders and the International Tribunal ----- Conference. Though the legislation could be perceived as being idealistically good. However, due to the nature of the planning of the tribunal, the Charter was just empty promises on paper. Due to these factors, the Nuremberg War Crime Trials in 1945 – 1946, were defiantly a representation of “Victors’ Justice” for the Allies.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Nuremberg Trials On June 22, 1945 representatives from France, Great Britain, Russia, and the United States started to plan the prosecution of the main Axis war criminals. These representatives had to establish a fair way of trying the criminals because the world had never seen a situation like the one at hand. The result of the meeting was the International Military Tribunal. The Tribunal’s constitution set forth the principles the defendants were subject to. The panel of Allied representatives decided to hold the trial in Nuremberg.... [tags: Essays Papers]
1247 words (3.6 pages)
- Human rights are the fundamental moral rights to which a person is inherently entitled to simply because he or she is a human being. Human rights are designed to be universal and equally claimable by everyone, regardless of your "nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, language, or any other status." (United Nations, 2005). They are considered inalienable, thus, should not be taken away, except in specific circumstances. They are also expressed as inseparable and interdependent, and the removal of one right will effect others.... [tags: Human rights, World War II, United Nations]
840 words (2.4 pages)
- I. Bench to Bedside Clinical trials are experiments involving humans. They test whether the treatments works and how effective they are. These trials are design to improve the health of patients. Until trials tested, there is insufficient information on whether treatment is effective or not. The absence of trials will cause a major potential risk that people will be given harmful treatments. Animal research is experiments involving animals. Animals provide scientist with complex living systems consisting of cells, tissues, and organs.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Informed consent]
1489 words (4.3 pages)
- In 1933, the Chancellor of Germany, Adolf Hitler alongside the defendants consisting of a bracket of Nazi officials, doctors and lawyers, military officers, and German industrialists, were impeached for crimes against mortality and human nature. The Nuremberg trials brought Nazi criminals to their justice (Harvard University, Nuremberg Trials Project). The Nazi superior, Adolf Hitler, had committed suicide and was never conducted in these trials. The legal rationale of the cases at the time, were contentious.... [tags: adolf hitler, nazi policies]
1049 words (3 pages)
- Immediately following World War II, the Allied leaders had a tough decision to make. They had to decide what to do with the hundreds of Nazi military criminals. The Allies decided to form an International Military Tribunal (IMT) in order to charge the Nazi criminals based on four areas of crimes: “Conspiracy to wage aggressive war, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity” (Timeline: The War in Europe and Its Aftermath N/A). This tribunal did not try those accused of similar crimes on the Allied side.... [tags: World War II]
846 words (2.4 pages)
- ... Most would say that “If I were them” but there are no “If I were them” because if you were them and they all fell for it it’s the only logical that anyone else would fall for it. Why is that nobody ever finishes what they started. The reality was after a certain amount of people and thirteen years the Nuremberg trials were put to a stop. The most important thing though is that men were convicted for things that they might not have actually done. Why it is that only the leaders, judges, and doctors were tried and sentenced at court when there were other key players.... [tags: Treaty of Versailles, not guilty verdict]
869 words (2.5 pages)
- The Nuremberg Trials The Nuremberg trial was built up to be the trial of the century. In the word's of Norman Birkett, who served as a British alternate judge: it was "the greatest trial in history" . The four most intriguing characters of this trial were of vast contradiction to each other; there was Herman Georing the relentless leader, Joachim von Ribbentrop the guilty and indecisive follower of Hitler, Hjalmar Schacth the arrogant financial wizard of the Rich and Albert Speer the remorseful head of armament and munitions.... [tags: Papers]
1527 words (4.4 pages)
- The Nuremberg trials were a series of military tribunals that took place from November 20, 1954 to October 1, 1946. They were most notable for the prosecution of prominent members of the political, military, and economic leadership of Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany was responsible for the Holocaust, a program of genocide that consisted of “the deliberate annihilation of approximately 6 million European Jews before and during WWII” (Seltzer 512). As Telford Taylor, the Chief Counsel for War Crimes, wrote in 1949, “Nuremberg has been both hailed as a milestone in the evolution of international law and morality, and condemned as a wreaking of vengeance by the perversion of justice.” The legacy thes... [tags: Nazi Germany, military, international law]
1207 words (3.4 pages)
- The Trials at Nuremburg November 20, 1945: The beginning of the Nuremberg trial of Nazi War Criminals The opening day of the Nuremberg trail of Nazi War Criminals began on November 20, 1945. Lord Justice Lawrence, the British president of the international tribunal, oversaw the proceedings against the surviving major leaders of the Third Reich. In his opening statement, he called the trial "Unique in the history of the jurisprudence of the world" (Opening). And thus, the case of the United States, French Republic, United Kingdom, and Soviet Union against Germany was opened in Nuremberg, Germany.... [tags: Papers]
1278 words (3.7 pages)
- The debate of humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect have been discussed in international relations discourse more seriously within the last 60 years. The major historical developments which have led to an increase in the intensity of these debates have had beneficial and detrimental effects on Earth within the last 20 years. Several factors have contributed to this including; globalization, the rise in international accountability, an increase humanitarian consciousness to prevent major atrocities from occurring, the expansion of territorial to global responsibility of the western world, and the realization of the western world that regional sovereignty no longer accoun... [tags: Human Rights]
2052 words (5.9 pages)