Weapons of mass destruction come in many forms and all pose different threats. Chemical weapons date back to the Peloponnesian war and today are occasionally still used in the form of gas to incapacitate or kill its targets, even though they were outlawed by the Geneva Protocol in 1925. Biological weapons are living organisms such as Anthrax and are sometimes called “the poor man’s WMD”. Biological threats are very serious, they are very difficult to detect and can effect large areas by being passed along by citizens. In 1918 the “Spanish Lady”, which was very similar to the “Bird Flu”, killed over one million people because it could be spread by humans . While each of these weapons are threatening to the health and safety of citizens, the most dangerous are nuclear weapons. The first nuclear bomb was detonated on July 16th 1945 and since then there have been 3018 tests. Nuclear weapons are capable of tremendous devastation, on August 6, 1945 the U.S. dropped the first atomic bomb over Hiroshima, wiping out the city and instantly killing over 80,000 people, ten...
... middle of paper ...
...rful, but if they had a nuclear deterrent there would be no way to force them to follow international rules.
It is critical for global security and stability that nuclear weapons of mass destruction stay out of the hands of rogue nations. Nuclear weapons are capable of causing enormous casualties but equally as frightening is their effect on global stability. A nuclear weapon is so powerful that it can force its enemies into submission without ever being launched. WMDs in the wrong hands would be able to devastate the global economy and order. A rogue nation with access to nuclear weapons could annihilate entire states and disrupt world order simply by threatening anyone who attempted to control or sanction it. While all forms of WMDs should be feared and respected, nothing poses as great a threat to our global community as nuclear weapons of mass destruction.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Nuclear weapons are the only remaining weapons that are allowed to be used for mass destruction. This weapon could do its job from being launched 50 million away from where they want it to land. Currently, there are around 15,000 nuclear warheads in the world, 7,300 of them being in Russia and around 7,000 in the U.S. and the rest being located in countries like china, Japan, Pakistan, India, united Kingdom, France and Israel. All these countries use these powerful weapons as a great source of security for their country.... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1047 words (3 pages)
- There are at least 17,300 nuclear weapons in existence, with North Korea at the least with less than 10, the US is in second place with 7,700 nuclear weapons and Russia has the most with 8,500, enough to wipe out the world’s population many times over and 2,500 (7%) of these weapons are ready to fire at a moment’s notice. Nuclear weapons today are much more powerful than ever before, but what are the real effects of these explosive killing machines. Nuclear weapons are Dangerous to the world’s population and should be eliminated from their use in global warfare.... [tags: weapons of mass destruction, nuclear power]
997 words (2.8 pages)
- Throughout history people have searched high and low for weapons to turn the tides of war. With modern technology we have reached a point that at the push of a button we could destroy our entire planet. The question now is, are the weapons needed for protection, or should they be destroyed in an effort to save the world from potential destruction. There are no right answers, only the loss of power or the loss of humanity. Which should we choose. We must all learn the dangers of weapons of mass destruction to decide which side to stand up for.... [tags: nuclear power and weapons, laser technology]
1153 words (3.3 pages)
- Nuclear weapons are the safest defense mechanism in the world. Although nuclear weapons can lead to mass destruction and the loss of thousands of lives when detonated, they are the optimal solution to the conflicts between countries in the future. The actual use of the nuclear weapon is not the deterrent, but rather just the mere fact that a country could use it against another country which avoids the large scale conflict. Thus, nuclear deterrence presents itself as a preferred security option.... [tags: global issues, weapons of mass destruction]
1888 words (5.4 pages)
- The CounterProductiveness of Weapons of Mass Destruction At 5:30 a.m. on July 16, 1945, Scientist from a government sanctioned group called Los Alamos dropped the first Atomic bomb at Trinity site. The World was never the same again. Less than a month Later a B-29 US bomber christened the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb On the japanese city of Hiroshima instantly killing 80,000 Japanese civilians. The Bombing of Nagasaki followed within the week, and in total about 220,000 people died. While some may say that the dropping of these bombs were justified, the world it led us to is a darker one because of it.... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1139 words (3.3 pages)
- Throughout the century mankind has been in countless wars and with each passing war weapons have become more lethal and creative. In ancient days armies fought with smoke screens and toxic fumes, throughout the years methods of destroying other armies in one fell swoop has become an ultimate goal. In the outbreak of World War I and World War II armies developed phosgene, chlorine, mustard gas and nerve agents (Hersh, 1968, pg 7). Nuclear weapons were also developed in WW II, with so many threats the United States had to shield and protect itself (Davis, Purcell, 2006 pg 3).... [tags: World War II, United States, Nuclear weapon]
1087 words (3.1 pages)
- The whole world is just waiting for the one country, whether it is China, Russia, or North Korea, to set off a nuclear missile that would start a nuclear war and that would only end when there are few survivors left. However, maybe there is another way that a war could have an extreme number of casualties on every continent. The United States Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism believes that an attack with a biological weapon is more likely than one with a nuclear weapon (Suk).... [tags: nuclear weapon, biological weapon, bioterrorism]
2014 words (5.8 pages)
- The term weapon of mass destruction has been in existence since the 1930’s. Weapons of mass destruction can be better identified as nuclear weapons, biological weapons, chemical weapons, or radiological weapons. A true definition of weapons of mass destruction is “any destructive device; any weapon that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors; any weapon involving a biological agent, toxin, or vector; any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life”.... [tags: Chemical Weapons]
1056 words (3 pages)
- Throughout the entirety of the twentieth century, the most disputed topic of discussion has perhaps been that of nuclear weapons. Some people argue these weapons of mass destruction are vital to the survival of order and decency in the world, while others contend that nuclear weapons will bring an end to civilization as we now know it. Regardless of both of these arguments, there are two things that just about nobody can deny – nuclear weapons are extremely expensive and enormously destructive.... [tags: Nuclear Weapons Essays]
1253 words (3.6 pages)
- 'Nuclear weapons protect our country. The very fact we have them means no-one will ever use them' In this account, I am going to discuss the diverse arguments which concern the issue of nuclear weapons, and whether or not their ownership actually voids use. Exploring both contrasting arguments, I will discuss both sides to the subject; arguments which support this statement contrast a great deal to those who rebut it, yet both sides have their valid reasons to their case; those who favour the statement believe that the weapons are somewhat of a taboo, however, those who support the opposing view look at the matter a lot more practically, after all nuclear we... [tags: Nuclear Weapons Essays]
810 words (2.3 pages)