I must acknowledge how far nuclear energy has come since its conception, as well as how effective and immediate it can be. As Nathan Myhrvold states in his article, titled “Nuclear Power Needs to Be an Option,” “Nuclear energy technologies present a carbon-free option for electricity production that we can pursue immediately while we accelerate our pursuit of new technologies.” Myhrvold also points out that “The current state of the art nuclear plants have improvements in safety that make them safer in any rational measure than coal or gas plants. New designs minimize waste, incorporate inherent safety mechanisms and reduce proliferation risk.” While I do recognize these improvements, I do not think that nuclear energy is safe enough
yet to be implemented on a large scale. At least as long as the chance for a disaster on the scale of Fukushima or Chernobyl stands. But Myhrvold suggests that these fears are misplaced and based on highly unlikely scenarios, that we should be fearing the danger on the forefront, climate change. However, I do not believe these fears are...
... middle of paper ...
... of electricity it produces” (Sovacool 553). This makes it worse than every clean energy alternative. Not only this, but “according to the Oxford Research Group (2007), by 2050 the total life-cycle carbon footprint for 1 kWh of nuclear electricity will be the same for 1 kWh from natural gas” (Sovacool 553). In brief, nuclear energy might not even be worth the risk.
At this venture, I do not believe nuclear energy to be the answer for our climate issues. It simply has not advanced enough to be considered, and absolutely requires more work. As proved in Chernobyl, accidents caused by these reactors are destructive to a massive extent. Furthermore, nuclear energy is not worth the lives that it risks, harming the environment more than it mends it. We must decide on a power option, our home is at stake, but a facet of a power originally harnessed for war is not the remedy.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- “Face it. Nukes are the most climate-friendly industrial-scale form of energy” (Power, Reiss, Pearlstein, 655). This statement is what I’m trying to promote through my argument. It also ties Inconvenient Truths: 10 Green Heresies by Matt Powers, Spencer Reiss, and Jonanna Pearlstein and Nuclear Power is Best Energy Source: Potchef Stroom together by bring out the main point all authors are trying to get across. Global warming has been a big concern for years now and one of the biggest causes for it, is the burning of fossil fuels to get energy.... [tags: Nuclear power, Coal, Energy development]
949 words (2.7 pages)
- Topic: Nuclear Power Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience that why we should use Nuclear power and it is the solution to the energy crisis. Thesis: Nuclear power could replace coal and solve the energy crisis unlike the other alternatives such as renewable energy. Such as wind and solar power. Introduction (Attention Getter :) I. Good Afternoon guys, many of you comes from countries that utilize nuclear power. Whether to use nuclear power or not is a controversial topic that is often debated upon.... [tags: Energy development, Nuclear power, Wind power]
897 words (2.6 pages)
- Powerless Americans tend to not think about where the power that fuels their homes comes from. Furthermore, common sense seems to dictate that nuclear power is a dangerous source of energy that kills our environment. People use examples such as the nuclear power plant disasters of Fukushima and Chernobyl to deem how nuclear power is dangerous. Like environmentalists believe, the environment is something that the human society must take care of. However, when one strolls through an industrial city that fuels the interests of society, factories fill the air with totems of harmful smoke that pollute the air that society breathes.... [tags: Nuclear power, Energy development]
1789 words (5.1 pages)
- In recent years with the rapid development of society the natural resources in the world are being consumed at an alarming rate. As these resources reduce, people have been looking for another resource to replace them. The result by contrast with hydraulic power, wind, nuclear power and another way that the nuclear power can be proven that it is a stable and efficient energy resource. This essay will argue that nuclear power is a suitable source for energy generation. It will focus on the efficient of nuclear fuel, environmental protection and economic impacts.... [tags: Coal, Nuclear power, Energy development]
1120 words (3.2 pages)
- In order to ensure the viability of the nuclear industry, there have been many attempts from experts to improve the safety of current and future plants. The intention is to minimize the likelihood of accidents, and avoid any major consequence for people living near the nuclear plants. In 1957, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was formed by the United Nation to ensure the safety of operating nuclear plants worldwide. Its main functions are to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy, and “to provide a strong, sustainable and visible global nuclear safety and security framework, protecting people and the environment from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation” (International... [tags: Nuclear power, Energy development]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- Nuclear Energy in Japan Did you know only 70 miles away from Japan’s capital city Tokyo lived a “Nuclear Valley”, encompassing more than 15 nuclear power plants. This valley was bound for success and energy delivery, until in 1999 everything went south. The Tokaimura incident is one of many nuclear catastrophes in Japan making citizens unhappy [Cont. Japan]. What is Japan’s current situation in relation to nuclear energy today. The late 1990’s was a boom in Japan’s electrical output with the help of the very first Nuclear Power plant built in the Tokai area the power plant generated up to 27.7 Billion Kilowatt hours of energy in its 2 years of up-time [ inis.iaea.org].... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission, Nuclear fusion]
1204 words (3.4 pages)
- There are plenty of things that might kill us nowadays. Among these are epidemics, wars, and maybe even the sun eventually swallowing up the planet. More prominently, we will be heavily damaged by carbon emissions from fossil fuels resulting in global warming.Obviously we need to solve this problem by moving to clean energy. The United States, along with many other countries around the world, are looking at nuclear energy as the possible solution. But, despite many advancements and benefits, the usage of nuclear energy still has the power and chance to devastate civilizations around the world, and may not even solve the prevailing issue of carbon emissions.... [tags: Chernobyl disaster, Nuclear power, Coal]
1007 words (2.9 pages)
- In 1789, Uranium was discovered by a German chemist. 149 years later in 1939, a German scientist by the name of Otto Hahn along, with his assistant Fritz Strassmann, discovered nuclear fission. Nuclear fission releases massive amounts of energy. But not only does it release massive amounts of energy, Nuclear fission will also release additional neutrons which can then produce fission in other uranium nuclei. Which could then turn into a self sufficient chain reaction which can produce massive amounts of energy.... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission]
1184 words (3.4 pages)
- deemed renewable because the water will always flow around the world due to currents. The turbines used in the hydroelectric power are also extremely efficient and inexpensive, some of the modern turbines can convert close to 90% of the available energy into electricity. They are termed as alternative because these methods of generating power are less damaging to the Earth and are methods that are new generally new to our society. There are a vast amount of modern methods to generate power, nuclear energy is a popular in use today.... [tags: Wind power, Fossil fuel, Energy development]
1905 words (5.4 pages)
- Nuclear energy is created when water is heated therefore making it steam which turns turbines that generate electricity. However, unlike when fossil fuels are heated with just simply a heating source, the nuclear plant heats with uranium. In order for the plant to get the uranium it is either mined or extracted from the oceans, both in which are dangerous to the environment, and some scientist believe that the when finding uranium is worse for the environment than other forms of power (Q, B). The use of nuclear energy is like everything else it is used in order to reduce the world wide use of another source of energy, for example fossil fuels.... [tags: Nuclear power, Energy development]
1230 words (3.5 pages)