I will achieve this goal by at first looking at the types of threats that are facing the United Kingdom before moving on to where the threats are originating from then I will argue the positive case for why I believe the nuclear arsenal is not obsolete and I will rebut some counterarguments to these arguments I will finish by wrapping this all together in a conclusion.
In its review of security threats to the United Kingdom (HM Government, 2015) found that a Nuclear attack was in a 2nd tier ranking of threats behind the 1st tier of Terrorism, international military conflict, cyber-attacks, public health crisis, major natural hazards, and instability overseas these tiers based on the likelihood and the impact of such an attack occurring. This could be argued either way for whether it is obsolete by saying is lower down the list of threats or by saying that it is still a significant threat as it is still on the list of threats that could happen.
The first of the threats that I will examine is the threat of terrorism which is currently ranked by (Mi5.gov.uk, 2016) as severe meaning an attack is highly likely and in trying to combat such threats the United Kingdom has according to (HM Government, 2015) 10,000 military personnel on standby in case of need to respond to a terrorist attack.
Other ways that the United Kingdom is responding to this threat is by having greater interaction and collaboration with intelligence services in coun...
... middle of paper ...
...y with the world, therefore reducing incentives to go to war and the less interventionist past of china but this could be argued as a reason that the United Kingdom’s nuclear arsenal is not obsolete as threats could emerge in the future.
I will now examine the arguments that people put forth in regards to why they believe Nuclear weapons are still useful in the world today and the benefits they bring before considering the counterarguments to such positions and offering my rebuttal to these counter arguments.
One argument in favour of nuclear weapons is in the concept of deterrence theory and mutually assured destruction (MAD) under this concept actors who have nuclear capability would not want to attack another actor with nuclear capability because they would retaliate and you would be destroyed as well as them, therefore war between nuclear powers would not occur.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Albert Einstein once said, “The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking and we thus drift toward unparalleled catastrophe” (Krieger 4). The debate over the moral and life threatening potential of nuclear weapons has been in question since the first bomb was detonated almost eight decades ago. Nuclear weapons seem rightly owned by the world’s superpowers in order to ensure protection, yet it is feared that nuclear weapons are the horrible remnant of the Cold War that may still potentially cause unilateral destruction.... [tags: Abolishment Benefits, Nuclear Destruction]
1178 words (3.4 pages)
- ‘In today’s world there is no utility in possessing nuclear weapons.’ Discuss. The modern world has seen a rapid expansion in the number of nuclear weapon, most noticeably since the beginning of the Cold War and the subsequent arms race that followed between the US and the USSR. The rising tension between these two super powers during the Cold War brought nuclear weapons into the spotlight of society, making the possession and use of nuclear weapons a subject of much scholarly and popular debate in the modern world.... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1827 words (5.2 pages)
- In Support of the American Nuclear Arsenal August 5, 1945. A day that the entire world will remember, as it was the day that the first of two nuclear strikes against Japan ended World War Two. Although at the time “Fat Man” and “Little Boy” were the lesser of two evils, they started an arms race like the world has never seen. The Soviet Union, America, Great Britain, France, and later China, all started to produce nuclear weapons. The arsenals of these countries would soon number in the tens of thousands.... [tags: Nuclear Weapons, World Conflict, Defense]
2036 words (5.8 pages)
- Currently, as it is, income inequality is already a prevalent issue in today’s society where there is still currently a lot of people employed. “As of 2013, the top 1% of households, the upper class owned almost 39.8% of all privately held wealth in the United States” (Bloomberg 2014). Imagine as society gets further along, technology wise and more advanced, the distribution of wealth and money will be heavily tilted towards C.E.Os, corporations, and business owners. As jobs become obsolete, the general population will live in less than desirable conditions and increase the poverty rates across the world.... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission, Nuclear weapon]
1519 words (4.3 pages)
- "For the first time humankind has the power to destroy itself." 1 The nuclear age has changed the world, for the good and the bad. Though the bad, is far greater than the good. We sometimes ponder to our selves, "what would happen if we were forced in to a nuclear war ware their are now winners." The way life would be after such an incident would change life as we know it drastically. In the event of a nuclear war with the Soviets we would have lost approximately one hundred and fifty million American lives.... [tags: Nuclear War]
1797 words (5.1 pages)
- Ever since the invention of the nuclear bomb there has been tension and concern about what countries can have nuclear weapons and the hazards of nuclear proliferation. Countries have had inner conflicts trying to decide whether they should begin building a larger arsenal or starting one because they are concerned how it will affect their nation and their safety. If they build an arsenal of weapons they will be feared but they must decide if that lead to positive results or negative consequences.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1096 words (3.1 pages)
- Ever since the invention of the nuclear bomb, there has been tension and what countries can have nuclear weapons and concern about the hazards of nuclear proliferation. Countries have had inner conflicts trying to decide whether they should build a larger arsenal or start one by virtue of their concern of how it will affect their nation and their safety. If they build an arsenal of weapons, they will be feared; nonetheless, they must decide if that would lead to positive results or negative consequences.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1346 words (3.8 pages)
- Nuclear weapons have in the past, been a hot topic. The issues surrounding them have only grown and now Iran might get nuclear weapons. Will arming Iran with nuclear weapons bring an increase in peace. Not that long ago, American government did all it could to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, now they are attempting to negotiate a way for them to have them. Increasing the amount of nuclear weapons and countries that have them will only exacerbate a doomsday-like future and decrease the time it takes to get there.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
871 words (2.5 pages)
- It’s been over 14 years since the terrorist attacks of September 2001. As the world settles into its long war on terrorism, the recent Iran nuclear deal has brought nuclear disarmament and proliferation back into the forefront of public debate. What steps have been taken to address the many security challenges posed by nuclear weapons. More importantly, are the steps taken enough. When we think about nuclear security, the first thought that comes to mind is preventing nuclear war, preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
705 words (2 pages)
- Rocky Mountain Contaminated Rain: A Look into the Creation of the Rocky Mountain Arse Rocky Mountain Arsenal The United States Army has created many chemical weapons facilities during its tenure as a military organization. Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) in Colorado was such a facility, and its existence had a major negative impact of the environment of the surrounding area. Many Americans are generally unaware of the facility’s original purpose, and specifically unaware of the historical information concerning its creation and eventual dismantling, information which is fascinating, as well as highly informative.... [tags: US army, arsenal, chemical weapon]
1101 words (3.1 pages)