Nozick describes several different stages that come between the original Lockean state of nature and his own idea of the minimal state. The only stage that is important here however is the stage between the ultra-minimal state and the minimal state. Once people leave the original Lockean state of nature they begin the formation of protection agencies. After a while, one agency becomes dominant and, with the consent of the people that are governed, it becomes a state. Nozick states that a dominant protection agency can only be a state if it fulfills two conditions: (1) it operates a monopoly of force in its territory, not allowing any individuals to take c...
... middle of paper ...
... multiple protection agencies who have no legal or peaceful obligation to follow the larger protection agency all in the same area there can be a high chance of internal fighting and anarchy which is exactly what Nozick is trying to get away from with the creation of his Libertarian paradise.
In conclusion, even though the arguments make sense on the surface, they fail to take into account for how unpredictable the non-clients of the protection agency can be. In Nozick’s perfect Libertarian world, everyone would subscribe to one protection agency that would protect the rights of everyone. Unfortunately with everyone being free to do as they please in the state of nature, conflict is almost sure to arise. This isn’t necessarily a problem in the current state that we live in but for Nozick’s overall idea of a dominant protection agency these problems seem significant.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In his 1975 book Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Robert Nozick introduced a now famous thought experiment he entitled "The Experience Machine." Nozick believes that this intuition pump successfully demonstrates that hedonism is false and that human beings do value things other than happiness and pleasure as goods in themselves, namely "authenticity" and the like. In this paper, I will offer a thorough exegesis of the Experience Machine thought experiment and attempt to show that it fails to establish that something like authenticity could serve as a potential normative foundation.... [tags: Robert Nozick Anarchy State and Utopia]
3406 words (9.7 pages)
- Robert Nozick was a political philosopher who best reflects the political thinking of the United States, to the extent that his work is unthinkable without considering the history and the constitution of the nation. From this starting point Nozick show us that in the state of nature men are entitled on one hand to their lives and safety, and also to self-possession. Inspired by empiricist philosopher John Locke who proclaimed that natural rights exist and are claimable, Nozick claims that his concept of a minimal state is morally justifiable.... [tags: Political philosophy, John Rawls, Justice]
1040 words (3 pages)
- Nozick contends that people own themselves and their talents and therefore they own what they produce with these talents. By mixing their labour with the material world, they tend to increase the value of it. Consequently, people’s self-ownership, and by extension their labour, allows them to stake a claim to parts of the external material world. (Kymlicka, 2002, 109; Nozick, 1974, 149–182) Hence, one’s rights of ownership over one’s means of production can be grounded wholly in one’s libertarian right of self-ownership.... [tags: Property, John Locke, Capitalism, Property law]
1708 words (4.9 pages)
- Robert Nozick uses the example of Wilt Chamberlain to develop his theories on entitlement and distribution by establishing his libertarian view of justice in chapter 7 of his book "Anarchy, Stat, And Utopia" . Wilt Chamberlain, the basketball star, charges fans twenty-five cents to watch him play. Nozick creates a world in which we are to assume that the actions leading to this point, for all people, are just. Chamberlain simply offers his services to those who wish to attend the event. Assuming that he continues his show for some time, and people continue to pay the twenty-five cent fee, Chamberlain could generate a great deal of revenue.... [tags: philosophical, ownership, inequality]
895 words (2.6 pages)
- In his book “Anarchy, State and Utopia”, Nozick asserts that all humans have certain fundamental rights, such as life, health, liberty, and property. And these rights cannot be taken away from the citizens. The state, he claims, as no moral authority over someone's property which has been justly acquired. He claims that if a person has justly claimed his property than the state does not have any jurisdiction to take that away from him. The problem with all distributive principles of justice, he believes, is that they violate some of the basic human rights and are therefore inherently unjust.... [tags: rawls, liberty and power]
1235 words (3.5 pages)
- John Rawls and Robert Nozick write about very different societies and offer the ways that these societies will be governed and the rights its citizens will have. Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness differs from Nozick’s ultra-minimal state in various ways. They each describe the issues of justice, morality and the law through the issues of rights of citizens and the power of individuals. If I had a choice, I would prefer to live in a liberal society as Rawls mentions, in which I would be able to act as a free and equal person with basic rights and have the ability to participate in the creation of institutions.... [tags: Political philosophy, Law, Liberalism, John Rawls]
1533 words (4.4 pages)
- In this paper, I will examine Nozick’s ‘whatever arises from a just situation by just steps is itself just’ formula. By this formula, Nozick protects individuals’ absolute property rights. To examine its validity, first, I will show that Nozick’s entitlement theory relies on Kantian principle, which demands treating everyone as persons having individual rights with dignity. However, it will be clear that Kantian theory does not necessarily yield the concept of absolute property rights. Second, I will explain the principle of self-ownership, which will clarify that persons have rights over their bodies and powers.... [tags: Property, John Locke, Ownership, Copyright]
1929 words (5.5 pages)
- Robert Nozick was an American philosopher from Harvard University born November 16, 1938. He was the president of the American Philosophical Association and an author of many philosophical books. He is mostly known for his response to John Rawls, A Theory of Justice published in 1971. His response was written in Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974 which is considered one of the greatest philosophical writings published. Nozick gives his justification for libertarianism in this work of art. Libertarianism is the idea that the state should have limited power in society while most of the things are controlled by free markets.... [tags: Political philosophy, John Rawls, Justice]
1098 words (3.1 pages)
- I will argue that Epicurus’s version of happiness is false and Nozick’s Happiness helps show that. Epicurus’s version of happiness is the lack of pain and the meeting the basic needs. Epicurus also believes in having pleasurable things in life. Nozick’s shows how happiness is more than just pleasure or pain. He also shows how happiness is not the only important thing in life. Epicurus’s version of happiness is the lack of pain. His version of happiness requires friendship, thought, and freedom. Friendship is said to give people a sense of themselves and he believed that without friendship people would not be able to live without being emotionally numb.... [tags: Happiness, Personal life, Need, Suffering]
897 words (2.6 pages)
- Rawls vs Nozick John Rawls and Robert Nozick both provide compelling and thought provoking theories regarding the values of liberty and equality. Rawls focuses on both liberty and equality while Nozick theorizes exclusively on liberty. The ideas of Rawls and Nozick have multiple strengths as well as weaknesses which allow for debate and comparison between the two theories. John Rawls was more in agreement with the works of Locke and Rousseau; however, Rawls disagreed with the notion that the State of Nature was a historical situation as opposed to something hypothetical; Rawls instead believed an original position of equality which I agree with (917).... [tags: Political philosophy, John Rawls, Liberalism]
792 words (2.3 pages)