Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Violence in the movies
Violence in the movies
Violence in the movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
People who love violence tend to be desensitized to acts of violence, but violent movies don 't necessarily promote violence. Furthermore, Noah Gittell in his article “Not All Movie Violence Is Created Equal”, which is written just one day after the tragedy in Newton unfold, affirm that real life violence “can’t be relegated to having a single cause, and if it can, that cause certainly isn’t a work of entertainment.” (Gittell). In his article, Noah Gittell assert that “the best work of entertainment are already having that [violence] debate” and “violent films stand out as examples of how fiction provides a safe space to examine violence and mankind’s inability to move past it”. To support these ideas Gittell used variety of different movies …show more content…
The first flaw in “Not all violence movie is created equal” system is Gittell lack of convincing evidence. When talking about Looper, Gittell give too much details about special fact of the movie instead of drawing the connection to his final conclusion about how Johnson may use the scene “ between Joe and the mob” to “resemble the relationship between a film and its audience” (Gittell). Secondly, Gittell made a false assumption about his reader’s knowledge. Since “Not all movie violence is created equal” talked about how violence scenes shouldn’t necessary promote violence, Gittell’s intended audience include a lot of anti-violence movie critics. Despite that fact, Gillet’s supporting evidences are mostly found on the-most-extreme-violence-movie-of-all-time list. By taking references from these kind of movies, Gittell consequently confuse not-so-much-a-fan-of-violence-film readers. Plus, the majority of movies that Gittell used have complexity plot which discourage a lot of eager-to-know-what-he-say-but-don’t-want-to-read-too-much readers. If I were Gittell, I would use movies which are more general and popular as well as have simple plot like the Karate Kid and In Time to prove that violence is just another movie genre whose quality depends fully on the people who make it. The finale flaw that …show more content…
When I was a kid, I usually enjoyed fighting a lot even though I got no reason to do so. I never pay much attention to my parent’s feeling and how I can be a bad role model to my little sister until I got a chance to watch Tam Mao, a movie about an orphan kid who got no choice but to fight everyday in the poor neighborhood to survive. That’s when I knew violence should be the last choice that I should consider in life. Overall, I don’t think Gittell did his best job in this article. In my opinion, “Not all movie violence is created equal” is similar to a Samsung Note 7 which have great construction but are so likely to disappointed its’ users by blowing off in their
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
It has been happened frequently in today’s society that parents and teachers try to keep children away from violent media. Children are taught that violent is not right and dangerous. In the article, “Violent Media Is Good for Kids”, Gerard Jones asserts that allowing children to violent media instead of banned it can bring great benefit to children during their growing stage. By watching violent media, children learn to overcome fear, control the rage and prove the real self from the superheroes in the story. Jones believes that violent entertainment can assistance children to fulfill emotional and development need. In my opinion, Jones develops a persuasive argument because of his strong emotions, considerable evidences and reasonable assumptions.
Violent Media is Good for Kids, by Gerard Jones, is an article which makes many claims to support the argument in which a controlled amount of violence could be beneficial for a young, developing child. Even though the topic of this article can be controversial, the claims serve to support the argument in many noteworthy ways. It is written in such a way that it tells a story, starting when the author was a child and works its way to his adulthood. In this case the author uses, what I believe to be just the correct amount of each rhetorical strategy, and fulfills his goal for writing the article. This argument is interesting and at the same time, effective. Throughout the analyzing process logos, ethos, and pathos are searched for and scrutinized.
In “Violent Media is Good for Kids” Gerard Jones introduces us to his fearful and lonesome childhood. He lived in a world where he was taught to be the violence fearing, and passive boy his parents wanted him to be. But, when one of his mother’s students gave him a Marvel comic book, his fearfulness was transformed into inspiration. He found a way to escape these discouraging feelings through the “stifled rage and desire for power” (Jones 285) that he had newly found. The popular comic book hero “The Hulk” freed him from his passive and lonely persona. Throughout the article he cites his testimonies and the testimonies of others as examples; and shows how they used violence as a positive realm for “overcoming powerlessness.” (Jones 287) Ultimately, Jones is trying to convey the message that violent media can provide kids with psychological tools for coping with the problems that they face as they grow. Although there are slight hints of biased evidence, “Violent Media is Good for Kids” should be considered for the top prize for persuasive essays.
Representations of violence in the media (defined as through news, film, and television) throughout history have contributed to desensitization to violent actions.
Valenti, Jack. "Violent Movies Do Not Make Children Violent." Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. 4 May. 1999. Rpt. in Violence in the Media. Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego: Greenhaven. 2001. 72-74.
The author of “Hollywood, Stop Exposing Our Kids to Violence” claims that filmmakers need to stop producing violent movies. The article argues that many children pick up bad habits from watching violent
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
Knowing who will be inspired by a movie meant for entertainment and go on a killing spree is highly unlikely and until then copycat acts of violence will continue to baffle society. But in the minds of a few already unstable minds the violence that some movies depict will take on a reality of their own. Then, regretfully there’s one fact that can’t be denied, it does happen. When an unstable mind is influenced by a movie the results the results can be devastating. Movies do influence society’s view on violence and in some rare cases it will motivate some to violence.
However, upon the new changes in cinema—the idea of ideology shifted as well. Modernist Cinema subverted that typical dominant ideology. There is always a larger question poses about the film as a whole; why was this film made? Badlands situates the spectator in the position to decide whether or not murder is evil based on the visuals he or she views. The author’s hopes is that by creating unidentifiable characters and a nonchalant world that the spectator will realize that the idea of murder isn’t in fact being promoted merely the opposite—it’s being subverted. The subject matter of this film is one that is certainly unpleasurable in terms of entertainment but actually a dissatisfaction intending to comment on society as a whole. This intentional provocation involves “the attack on ‘entertainment’ cinema [as] part of a broader attack on the whole of ‘consumer society’” (Wollen, 424). Cinema serves as a distraction from society, but also operates to make a point to its intended audience. The point being the obvious, murder should never be morally acceptable. Its consequences typically should evoke a reaction that testifies against nature of the
Does entertainment influence society's attitude towards violent behavior? In order to fully answer this question we must first understand what violence is. Violence is the use of one's powers to inflict mental or physical injury upon another; examples of this would be rape or murder. Violence in entertainment reaches the public by way of television, movies, plays, music, and novels. Through the course of this essay it will be proven that violence in entertainment is a major factor in the escalation of violence in society, once this is proven we will take all of the evidence that has been shown throughout this paper and come to a conclusion as to whether or not violence in entertainment is justified and whether or not it should be censored.
Tio Hardiman, the creator of the Violence Interrupters Program, said, “You can give them a history lesson. Your daddy was violent, your granddaddy was violent, and your great granddaddy was violent. And now your brothers are messed up because you misled them” (James et al., 2012). He is describing how violence is a learned behavior from your family and close peers. Hardiman goes on to tell a little about his own family’s history with violence. When he was fourteen, a man tried to hurt him in the streets, but his stepfather killed the man right in front of him, and he recalls feelings good about it. This family taught him violence was okay through their own
This article also makes referral comparison to another genre of film “Unlike in other genres (detective, thriller), there is usually neither sympathy for the victims of Evil nor admiration for heroes opposing it.”(Kord, 2016) Violence is what triggers the guilt in the audience and what starts to make them speculate of their morality. “Violence may well be the horror film’s way of hacking away at its audience to engage with guilt. Admit who you are. Admit what you did.” (Kord, 2016) The author questions other theorists with an ample amount of valid research from validated
In a research analysis of Media and Violence, studies show that “Although the typical effect size for exposure to violent media is relatively small ... this ‘small effect’ translates into significant consequences for society as a whole” (“Media and Violence: An Analysis of Current Research”, 2015). This states violent behaviors can come from the smallest variables, or clips from videos, which is why it is important for parents to control what their kids see, read, and watch, and limit the amount of violence exposure.
...onditions that ensure an adequate counterbalance increasing consumption in some cases, end up having a negative effect on children. Children learn best through demonstration followed by imitation, with rewards for doing things the right way. While not all are affected the same way, it can be said that, in general, violence in the media affects attitudes, values and behaviors of users. You run the risk that children end up understanding that it is reasonably practicable to resort to violence. The fear is that the models of aggressive behavior can be considered suitable. Thus, in an investigation, a good proportion of children (third) defined as normal acts of violence they had seen him mightily little. It is not; here is a risk of direct imitation, but rather a change in terms of reference: where extreme violence appears to be normal any more light may seem harmless.