More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of language bilingualism
Bilingualism effects on language acquisition
Effect of language bilingualism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should the conflicting rights of non-English speaking people be taken away because of an English-only law? I think non-English speaking people have the right to speak their homeland language in public events and as part of their social lives. In America no one should be allowed to be a form of prisoner because of their native language. There should be laws or ordinances to prohibit persons from confronting—either verbally or physically- non-English speaking persons for speaking their native language in their work or social life. Whenever these confrontations prompt wide spread publicly, native English speaking Americans begin debating the degree of influence that non-English speaking people can have in the social, political, and economic realms. Under the guise of protecting these sacred freedoms some agencies of the government – police forces, tax entities, and licensing agencies—have persecuted non-English speaking immigrants, particularly when the language barrier is appointed. Americans have rights and power. Under these guises of protecting these rights and the current power of Americans, some agencies persecute non-English speaking people. For examples, the NYPD as CNN reported, arrested woman taxi driver of in New York City for allegedly for not speaking English and ticketed for not having a valid English driver’s license. Another example, fox news report, our school environment have abuse racially children for not speaking English, because of the English only movement forcing children to learn English only as their prime language. Whether this illegal, discriminatory treatment of non-English speaking immigrants derives for racism or natives, these abuses will grow dramatically if the English only laws are entitled. These... ... middle of paper ... ...g and holding their traditional language. In the famous office of Congress John Fund among others legislators overturn some regulations laws. After some employees were fire for not speaking English on the job, violate the 1964 civil rights act. “a general right to be left alone, and to define one circle of intimacy; to shield intimate and personal characteristics and activities from the public gaze; to have a moment of freedom from the unmerited assault of the world and unfettered will of others in order to achieve some measure of tranquility for contemplation or other purpose, without which life loses its sweetness.”(Source CNN) New state or federal or city ordinances have adopted principles outlined. Of course, if one takes the native language of non-English people, then one would be violate the main principle of this country the right to be free no matter what.
As they have for decades, American people have insisted on their and social power. Under this guise of protecting those rights and the current of Americans, some agencies of the government- police forces, licensing agencies and business agencies- refused color people freedom rights. For example, as C-SPAN reported, that many color American are denied voting right in the Florida States, even though they had their voting registration cards with them just being color. Another example, as the New York times reported, that color people clashed with police for being refused their rights to be bury in a Chicago cemetery for being color. Whether this illegal discriminatory treatment of color people derives from racism or natives, these abuses will grow dramatically if laws are not enforced. American even endanger lives when laws are not enforced by government agencies insisted persecutions color people even more.
To possess the ability to read and write, is to be educated, is it not? It is a plausible argument that can be made, but we must ask ourselves what limitations and obligations drive this argument. One can counter that there are none and that literacy is simply not black and white, but a spectrum of many shades and colors. Dennis Barron argues that English, a language prevalently used by people in approximately 61 countries around the world, should be banned instead of formalized in the US. He states that it is not what it used to be and that it places too many stigmas on languages that are not itself or a part of its eminent division. The essay that follows is a continuation of the argument that Barron has made; that English as a whole should be banned instead of formalized. We all possess the ability to be literate, English is not and will never be an instigator or inhibitor of that.
Imagine living in a world where humans are treated equally and fairly no matter what race or ethnicity there is. Since the year of 1776, when the United States was formerly established, it has always been known as giving “equality” for all Americans. Why does equality have to be set on limitations for who receives it and who does not? Authors Cindy Camaro, Roger Daniels, and (publisher of “The Only Way to Handle it” image) all explains the harsh treatment that illegal immigrants faces through by rhetorical devices. The devices used proves that illegal immigrants should be given an opportunity to a path to citizenship in the Unites States and be treated fairly.
In addition, many concepts also do not translate well from one language to another. Native American language is highly regarded and reflects a unique view on the world. It is best for an officer to show respect when they speak their native language and do not force them to only speak English in public. Furthermore, Native Americans have a long history of forced assimilation into modern society and many were dined the right to speak their native language (Shusta, Wong, Olson, & Harris,
It is thus distressing to read in David Bernstein’s excellent book how anti-discrimination laws are being used to undermine civil liberties, such as the freedom of speech, in the very home of liberty itself. The US courts have in the past upheld freedom of speech, even where it might seem to encourage crime or subversion, but they have allowed anti-discrimination laws to over-rule freedom of speech. Once again the drive for equality is revealed as the greatest enemy of individual freedom.
America’s educational system is home to an increasing number of English language learners. Some research indicates that by the year 2030, over 40% of elementary and secondary students served by schools in the United States will come from homes where a language other than English is spoken (Thomas & Collier, 2001). In an effort to accommodate these students, the United States has adopted policies at both the federal and state levels. Generally, the direction taken to meet the needs of English language learners has depended on the climate of the nation. During times of peace and prosperity, policies reflect the nation’s tolerance of other languages and cultures. However, during times of war or conflict, policies have reflected intolerance or fear of anything deemed “un-American.”
Because of internalized racism, Latinos and Hispanics distance themselves from the Spanish language to support the English only movement. They are embarrassed of their inherited language and rather choose English to complete assimilation. “Almost 40% of Latino/a respondents prefer English as their dominant language…” (Padilla 20). Where I currently live, I always see on the day to day basis Hispanics and Latinos that immigrated to the United States from other countries sounding “white.”
From the time the Pilgrims landed in this great nation at Plymouth Rock, immigrants have been culturally diverse and have spoken many languages. When the Pilgrims arrived in the New World, they did not know how to communicate with the natives. Through intense study the natives learned the Pilgrims’ language. Even with the common language they were still a melting pot of different culture. Some would say that America has gotten over the language/ cultural barriers and now almost everyone speaks the common language of English, but there are still many immigrants who do not know English. Bilingual education is put into public schools for this reason, so that immigrant children can be assimilated to English gradually. The national language should be English instead of the official language because America has prided herself in being very diverse. If we take away the diversity, then we take away the core values that America has always had since her founding.
States have even gone as far banning undocumented people from residing in their state and do not recognize them as ‘persons’ under their constitution (Huber, 2010). Racist nativism has targeted specific groups and constructed a racialized ideal of who fits into the “American” national identity (Huber, 2010). A prime example of this is the Comprehensive Immigration Act 2006, which prohibits any person the right to enlightenment, or claim to have the government or any official communication, perform, or provide services or material, in a language other than English (Americans at Heart, 112). The rational behind the passing of this Act, is the government is trying to preserve the English national language. Laws such as this are clear illustrations of how racist nativism is a defense mechanism to sustain white dominance. Whites are historically and legally deemed the native “founding fathers” of the U.S., and undocumented students and people are deemed as a threat to the nationalistic identity. The true identity of an American, according to the Constitution is white. Racist nativism only reinforces the racist nativist ideology that America’s “beneficiaries” are only for
In recent years, large numbers of immigrants have migrated into the USA from Mexico, Philippine, Vietnam, China, and other counties. As of 2009, immigrants comprised 12.5% (38.5 million) of the total U.S. population (Batalova and Aaron par. 7). In 2011, the U.S. Census Bureau found that 50.4% of children younger than the age of one were Hispanic, black, Asian American, or belonging to other minority groups (Morello and Ted par. 2), and more than 60 million people who are 5 years old and older spoke a language other than English at home (Camille 3). Faced with the cultural diversity brought by immigrants, many nativists worry that the United States will lose the English language as an important core of a common cultural unity. With the help of organizations such as U.S. English and ProEnglish, the English-only movement is experiencing its second resurgence since the 1980’s.
Lorna Dee Cervantes said that: “the children run to me, laughing, spinning me blind and silly. They call to me in words of another language.” (lines2-4) I can feel her loneliness through her poem. Because she doesn’t feel she is American or Mexican, even though she doesn’t know who she is. The Native Mexicans call her a prostitute because she gets the influence from America for a long time. Cervantes thinks isn’t her fault, is her ancestor’s fault because she can’t control that. So that’s why I think immigrants should keep their “old language” alive. If we learn English and don’t know our own language, we won’t be able to communicate with our cousin. Even when we came back to our home country, we can’t communicate with other people. I don’t want to feel like I am a stranger in our home.
It seems that this topic has been a heated debate for the past couple of decades, which has caused some division over the issue. I learned that there are a variety of pros and cons that you can argue about this issue. I chose to be a part of the pro English side for three reasons: I believe that making English our official language (1) would allow the education system to focus on English as the primary language, (2) it would unite our country in regards to racial discrimination, and (3) our government and business operations would be a little more streamlined.
People should not be cut out of their identity just because someone else can’t speak a didn’t language. Anzaldua explains “I and all Chicano students were required to take two speech classes, their purpose: to get rid of our accents” – who is to say that robbing a person of its language is less violent” (206). It is inhuman for someone to cut a part of someone else’s identity just because they do not understand how it feels to be biracial. The author claims “attacks on one’s form of expression with the intent to censor are a violation of the First Amendment, El Anglo con cara de inocente nos arrancó la lengua, the wild tongue cannot be tamed, they can only cut out” (Anzaldua 206). Therefore, It is unfair how people looked upon for what language they speak, very language is unique in its way. Nevertheless, it is crazy to think that individuals who are not biracial rather cut part of someone’s identity, then learn a different language. Even though, biracial people try to minimize their community if they are not speaking their language
It's just outright disrespectful to growing minorities to make English an official language and could harm the economy. In order to increase the equality and progress the nation, it more fitting to make the United States have no official language and not discriminate or deter from completing their dreams in America. As times change and minorities grow and majorities decrease, the
Of course, opponents of mandatory foreign language courses will say that immigrants and naturalized citizens should learn and speak the "de facto" official language of the United States--English. It is a valid point, but misses the bigger picture. People who speak English as a second language are already bilingual, while American-born students typically are not. Language is the most fundamental aspect of a culture. Students who learn the not-so-foreign language of the predominant minority group in their region of the country will gain at least some insight into the different cultures of their neighbors and perhaps have a better understanding of them at the personal level.