“Among the New Suffragists, militancy was the chief weapon… No longer would they beg for their rights. They would henceforth, demand them.” (pg 17) Alice Paul and Lucy Burns would meet again and would discuss proposals to shift the NAWSA’s strategy to emphasize a federal campaign for a constitutional amendment. They were convinced that it promised the quickest route to national suffrage. Their strategy was on holding the national political parties responsible for failure to pass an amendment. If the Democratic Party members of Congress failed to pass a federal amendment, then they should be accountable next election.
NAWSA agreed to let Paul to organize a large suffrage parade in Washington DC, scheduled for the day of Wilson’s inauguration. Holding the parade on this date would receive mass media recognition and publicity to spread their cause. By 1913 Paul and Burns were recruiting more members for the Congressio...
... middle of paper ...
...e was tallied on June 4, the Senate passed the amendment by a vote of 56-24. The ratification process took fifteen months to accomplish. On August 26, 1920, the Secretary of State signed the official proclamation for the Nineteenth Amendment.
After years upon years the 19th amendment was approved; giving women the right to vote, but it was not any one person or event that achieved this great feat. It was the confluence of certain necessary factors of consent parades, fundraisers; picketing and lobbying the new suffragists were able to meet their goal of a federal amendment. The new suffragist’s constant pressure turned Wilson and Congress from not knowing about this movement to supporting it. The new suffragists did everything possible to get what they wanted and they achieved it by being determined and well organized by key leaders like Alice Paul and Lucy Burns.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Differing Strategies of Suffragists and Suffragettes In this essay I am going to describe the ways in which the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different. I will begin by explaining the terms Suffragist and Suffragette and the methods both organisations used to try to gain women the right to vote. The suffragists were members of the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS), who campaigned using legal and peaceful methods. Millicent Garrett Fawcett became the president of the NUWSS after Lydia Becker died in 1890.... [tags: Papers]
470 words (1.3 pages)
- The Work of Suffragists and Suffragettes In the early 1800's, very few people were allowed to vote. Unlike modern times voting was not seen as a 'human right'. Only the rich were allowed to vote, it was thought that if you owned property then you were 'respectable' and were sensible enough to use the vote properly. There was also a gender qualification, in which only men could vote. In 1832, 1867 and 1884, Electoral Reform Acts were passed which reduced the property qualification, increasing the amount of men who could vote.... [tags: Papers]
793 words (2.3 pages)
- Explorations of Aims and Methods Used by the Suffragists Although they seemed less active than the W.S.P.U., the N.U.W.S.S. were active in trying to convert public opinion. Unlike the Suffragettes, Suffragists welcomed male members in an effort to convince more men to their point of view. They had several methods that they used to persuade the harsh public opinion. peaceful, e.g. reasoned argument, meetings, issuing leaflets and collecting petitions. Met with politicians to argue their case.... [tags: Papers]
648 words (1.9 pages)
- The Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and the Suffragettes Were Different Women wanted suffrage and equality to men. In an attempt to gain votes for women, two protest groups called the Suffragists and the Suffragettes were formed to try and change the law so women could vote and work in higher paying, more important jobs. Both groups wanted suffrage but on slightly different terms. The Suffragists took less radical approach and did not use violence, however some women felt as though they were getting nowhere with this passive protesting and formed the Suffragettes, who were extremely militant.... [tags: Papers]
774 words (2.2 pages)
- The Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different Although the Suffragists may be forgotten in history, they were as active as Suffragettes and it was with the input of both of their equally different methods that the vote won. Suffragettes were militant, resourceful, intelligent and determined and used violence and mainly illegal tactics to cause trouble and get themselves into the publics eye to bring awareness to their cause. Suffragists felt they were clearer about what they wanted to achieve and how they were going to achieve it.... [tags: Papers]
699 words (2 pages)
- The Reason Behind Women's New Right to Vote in 1918 In 1918 all men got the vote at 21 and all women got the vote at 30. However, women had to be householders or married to a householder. It is often said that women were given the vote because of the war. The war did change the situation in many ways. The obvious effect was that the women's role in the war was greatly appreciated - other than the usual criticism towards females. Public opinion gradually grew in favour of women. The war helped the participation of women in everyday life to the nation and proved how able they actually were.... [tags: Papers]
482 words (1.4 pages)
- ... "Iron Jawed Angels" addresses the concept that " If I act, I cannot but lose. But if I do not act, it is a different kind of defeat, equally decisive and maybe worse. because then I will not even have a conscience left"(Brink 304-305). Accepting the established system and believing that this is the absolute fundamental way of life in which women were asked wait their turn, withdrawal and neglect the possibility of influencing any decision that would affect their lives and those of their children.... [tags: 1920's women's suffragist movement]
927 words (2.6 pages)
- The Differences Between the Suffragists and Sufragettes Essentially both the suffragists (National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies) and suffragettes (Women’s Social and Political Union) were fighting for the same thing. The thing that makes them different was the methods they used to achieve their political common goal. This common goal was to achieve the right for women to vote, and to improve women’s rights in general. Ultimately they wanted equal rights to men. Each method was effective in its own way, and together they achieved the vote for women aged over 30 in 1918.... [tags: Free Essays]
402 words (1.1 pages)
- Effectiveness of Suffragists and Suffragettes The suffragists and suffragettes campaigned for votes for women from 1906 to 1914. The suffragists campaigned politically, organising petitions, marches and meetings. The suffragettes were violent protesters, vandalising public property, private property, and men's affairs. But how effective were these campaigns, of violence and peace. The suffragist's greatest achievement was arguably the introduction of the conciliation bill. Whilst Asquith removed female suffrage from this bill, the prime minister, it was the only bill to pass completely through parliament without being blocked.... [tags: Papers]
521 words (1.5 pages)
- A Comparison of the Methods of the Suffragists and the Suffragettes There were two main groups in Britain during the early 20th century who were both fighting for the same cause, women’s suffrage. Although in the end they both wanted the same outcome, they went about trying to win the vote in completely different ways. the first group to be established lead by Millicent Fawcett were the suffragists, they were made up of mainly middle class well educated women, and the suffragists believed the best way to get the vote was through peaceful tactics such as petitions and peaceful marches.... [tags: Papers]
733 words (2.1 pages)