Compare And Contrast New England And New France

840 Words2 Pages

New England and New France: Competing Visions for a New Society Not all colonial powers were equal. The French and the English (Puritans and Pilgrims), for example, differed in their justifications for colonization, how specific Native American tribes viewed them, and in their initial reasons for settling. Overall, the French were viewed more favorably by the Native populations with whom they were allied, were more tenacious in their religious conversion attempts, and had far fewer colonists than the English. NEW FRANCE: HURON AND THE FRENCH Unlike with other European colonies, the French did not see commerce as a stepping stone to some other goal of conquest or resource exploitation. The French chose to explore and begin trade routes in …show more content…

He was humiliated and the Jesuits saw this as an opportunity to assume his prior role. The Huron were mixed in their acceptance of this change of roles, some concerned that the Jesuits brought more harm than good to their people. However, the Jesuits assumed this spiritually powerful role without much resistance as the Huron recognized the importance of preserving relations with French traders (“Black Robe,” Lecture). Huron who converted were also offered better deals when trading with the French (Henkin and McLennan, …show more content…

Among the first English settlers were the pilgrims, a group of around 100 people who fled England in 1608 for Holland due to religious persecution (Henkin and McLennan, 54), but found it to be too tolerable (Lecture), and were concerned about the influence of the Dutch on their children (Henkin and McLennan, 54). With hopes of a “purer” society (Lecture, 9/21/16), they decided to emigrate to the New World, eventually landing at Plymouth Harbor. The Puritans emigrated because of concerns that “the English reformation had not fully purged itself of Catholic heresy,” (Henkin and McLennan,

Open Document