First and foremost, the warden should have been responsible for looking out for the possibility that there would have been people around, between the correctional centre and the medical centre in the city of Edmonton, whom had the risk of being in harms way. The employees, Ike and Melvin, just like the warden, should have been looking out for the same thing. Furthermore, as Ike and Melvin were stuck in traffic, they should have been more aware of the possibility of potential harm, due to the particular circumstance of having had an inmate in the vehicle with them.
Secondly, there is the question of whether or not the defendants failed to act as a reasonable person would, in the turn of events? The wardens’ and Ike and Melvin’s case could be que...
... middle of paper ...
...off of the employees; however, the stipulation is that both employees had to watch over Zeb, and when Ike left his post he committed a careless act and took it upon himself to make a decision that involved the safety of others. Therefore, the employees should be held partially responsible.
Ultimately, Helen Happy has a successful lawsuit against the warden of the Peace River Correctional Centre and the two employees of Alberta Correctional Service, Ike Inkster and Melvin Melrose. For, in order to succeed in a negligence case, the plaintiff must generally satisfy the court of the following four elements: duty of care, breach of standard of care, causation, and damages; which have been thoroughly proven above. Therefore the warden and employees should be held negligent for the harm caused to Helen Happy, and she should receive compensation befitting her situation.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- A series of events unfolded when George, running late for class, parked his car on a steep section on Arbutus drive and failed to remember to set the parking brake. The outcome of not remembering to set the parking brake caused many issues resulting in scrapping a Prius, breaking through fencing, people on the train sustaining injuries, and finally a truck that jack-knifed and caused a 42-car pileup. Could the parties that were injured, from George’s actions, be recovered from under the negligence theory.... [tags: Tort law, Tort, Law, Negligence]
887 words (2.5 pages)
- Introduction: Tort is defined as conditions where the illegal conduct of one party causes harm to another party. For example, party A had to face loss due to unethical or wrongful deeds of party B. Tort can be either negligent that is unintentional or intentional. Some examples of intentional torts include fraud, defamation, offense, insult, assault or interference among others. For example, during a business meeting, an employer suffers from reputation loss or insult due to the wrong deeds of another employer, with whom he had a clash before.... [tags: Tort law, Tort, Negligence, Law]
1254 words (3.6 pages)
- Issue: Are the agents G Shepherd & Co. and the loose asbestos insulation assessor, Basil, liable in negligence for harm that has occurred to Roland and Belle’s family. Relevant Rules or law: The Tort of Negligence: The Negligence is the failure for someone to take reasonable care to prevent foreseeable injury, loss or damage to other people. It also contains both intended and unintended acts and omission. The Negligence action can only be liable to the plaintiff by counting the following three elements which are based on the balance of probabilities under common law and statute : 1 Duty of care The duty of care exists in the relevant situation where risk of harm or injury to plaintiffs was ‘... [tags: Tort, Tort law, Negligence, Duty of care]
1119 words (3.2 pages)
- Deceit is purposeful lying that causes a loss for the claimant or gain for the defendant. Conversely, a negligent misstatement is an incorrect, careless statement that causes loss for the claimant, in which the defendant acts on unreasonable grounds. In order to establish a negligent misstatement, the misstatement must fulfil the requirements for negligence. The tort of negligence involves three components: duty of care, breach of duty, and damages. Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) is the origin of the tort of negligence in modern English law.... [tags: Tort, Tort law, Duty of care, Negligence]
1201 words (3.4 pages)
- There are several disagreements over the meaning of negligence, but it can be said to occur when the defendant has behaved in the way in which a reasonable person would not . There exists numerous crimes for which the mens rea is negligence, although some argue negligence should not be classified as a mens rea, where most of these are minor crimes of a regulatory nature . The concept of negligence is undoubtedly complex due to the fact that it is not certain whether it deserves criminal punishment.... [tags: Crime, Criminal law, Criminology, Negligence]
1636 words (4.7 pages)
- ‘Assumption of responsibility as the basis of liability for omissions in the tort of negligence is unfair’. Critically discuss by reference to one, or more, of the following theories of Tort law: deterrence, corrective justice, and distributive justice. In English law, there is no duty of the courts to impose liability for an omission or failure to act, despite the fact that there are compelling moral judgments for prevention of harm to another. The tort of negligence signifies that a person who causes damage by carelessness to others may be held liable to pay compensation.... [tags: Tort, Negligence, Duty of care, Contract]
1077 words (3.1 pages)
- In this essay we are able to identify the Law of tort and present a case from New Zealand covering tort of negligence and vicarious liability. The word ‘tort’ is derived from the Latin term tortem to twist and implies conduct which is twisted or tortious. It now means a breach of some duty independent of contract giving rise to a civil cause of action and for which compensation is recoverable. A Tort is a species of civil injury or wrong no civil injury is to be classed as a tort unless the appropriate remedy for it is an action for damages.... [tags: Tort, Tort law, Negligence, Strict liability]
909 words (2.6 pages)
- Issue To determine based on the case facts, if Alma can sue Norma for negligence based on tort law or not. Rule To establish negligence, it is imperative that three main conditions are to be satisfied. Firstly, it needs to be proved that the defendant had a duty to care directed towards the plaintiff. Secondly, there needs to be a breach of this duty due to the negligent conduct of the defendant. Thirdly, the plaintiff should have suffered harm due to the duty to care being breached by the defendant (Lindgren, 2011).... [tags: Negligence, Tort, Tort law, Duty of care]
1035 words (3 pages)
- There are defenses against negligence lawsuits for sports medicine professionals. The first of which is assumption of risk, where the athlete voluntarily and knowingly assumes the risk of an activity through an expressed or implied agreement. This can be done by having a form signed during pre-season paperwork. This does not forgive a clinician of reckless conduct, however. Assumption of risk is for the usual risks, and the athlete by singing assumes responsibility for injury that occurs as a result of the inherent dangers of sport.... [tags: Medicine, Health care, Negligence, Residency]
1318 words (3.8 pages)
- Negligence as a tort is defined as a breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage to the claimant. It has been established that in order to raise liability and succeed in negligence claim, the claimant must show that the defendant owes him a duty of care, that this duty has been breached, and that he suffered damage or loss which is within the scope of the duty. However, the question of whether a breach of a duty of care has occurred, involves two elements: how much care is required to be taken (in other words; the standard of care) and whether that care has been taken.... [tags: Negligence]
2061 words (5.9 pages)