Nuclear power is known to us as a source of energy and not much more than that. We do not consider the risks of this power source in which we use. Using nuclear power plants hurts our planet by producing harmful fumes and radioactive wastes. Nuclear power plants produce radioactive waste that has to be disposed properly but even with precautions the waste stays dangerously radioactive for several years with nothing we can do about it. It is not only dangerous because of life of the radioactive waste but also the consideration that it might be spilled in an area in which can harm our planet even more and/or people and animals. These power plants are technically atomic bombs since they have the same process to be able to produce high outputs of energy, messing around with atoms, which can be extremely dangerous. They are not only dangerous because of their output but also because their behavior is unpredictable when there is no systems to cool them down. For example, not to long ago Japan was struck by a massive earthquake which tampered with their nuclear power plants controlling systems and they were afraid that if the plants heated up to much they would explode. Japan had many fail-safes but in such a disaster as they were in we have to expect the unexpected. Nuclear power plants need to many precautions. If we switched our dependency on these plants we would be able to live a much more healthier and safer life. We can switch to green alternatives
which are much less harmful for both our planet and ourselves. There are many green alternatives which can fit into any type of surroundings. For example you would not put hydro pumps in a desert, but you might put solar panels to be able to collect the most energy p...
... middle of paper ...
...er from splitting atoms we used dangerous ways to get energy which is one of the main reasons we have global warming.
People might conclude that since a person who started of opposing nuclear power and is now a supporter makes it okay to support them aswell but there is also an opposing side. Greenpeace is one organization that never softened up to the idea of nuclear energy. They state, “We've always believed that it's an inherently dangerous technology that should be phased out and replaced," says Jim Riccio, a nuclear policy analyst for Greenpeace USA. "And there are many cheaper, easier and less dangerous ways to generate electricity that don't threaten our families, homes and communities.” (Are Nuclear Plants Safe? Environmentalists Are Split). There are opposing views on the topic which state that they see nuclear power as dangerous as everyone says it is.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Nuclear Chemistry Project - Fukushima There are too few precautions that are taken when considering Nuclear Power plants and the dangers involved. People trust the regulations too easily. Some systems fail; there needs to be more safety features and backup systems/plans that are checked more regularly. Nuclear power is made by a nucleus absorbing a neutron. It then splits into nuclei that are lighter than the original nucleus. This process emits large amounts of energy in the form of heat. Fuel rods are long slender rods of zirconium that provides the reactor with fuel.... [tags: nuclear power, Tsunami, Japan]
983 words (2.8 pages)
- ... Energy Production is another issue discussed concerning Nuclear Power Generation. People who agree with the idea of Nuclear Power use this in their argument because of the great things Nuclear Power can do. An example is that nuclear power emits more energy than fossil fuels. In an article called “The Pro and Cons of Nuclear Power”, Jeremy Smith states that Uranium, which is used to make nuclear energy, can produce 20,000 times as much energy than fossil fuels (2011). This means that a small amount of Uranium would be used to make an abundant amount of energy.... [tags: safety, radiation, energy]
990 words (2.8 pages)
- In 1950, the first commercial nuclear power plants were constructed. The public was promised a non-polluting and resourceful type of energy, but how safe was, and is, nuclear energy. Although there are less than 500 licensed nuclear power plants in the world, many nuclear accidents have already been endangering civilian lives. More serious accidents are not just likely, but inevitable (Fairchild 29). Nuclear energy may appear to be the ideal source of energy for the future: however, there are many negative effects of nuclear energy that can lead to very dangerous situations.... [tags: Nuclear Energy Negative Essays]
2114 words (6 pages)
- Power plants are used to conserve one resource and make it useful to our economy. These power plants help produce much of the world energy. It saves people money and helps benefit from the resources the world provided has humans. Solar power is the most economically viable power for widespread adoption because wind power and atomic power have a higher risk in widespread consequences. They’re less viable in large quantities to the general public and solar power can be safely and easily generated. Atomic Energy is Nuclear energy and it can be produced in large quantities.... [tags: Nuclear power]
1360 words (3.9 pages)
- Coal and natural gas are the United States’ main fossil fuels used as energy sources. These fossil fuels both contain mixtures of hydrocarbons, which is a chemical compound of carbon and hydrogen (Olah, 2005). Currently, fossil fuels provide eighty-five percent of commercial energy, such as businesses, worldwide and this eighty-five percent does not even account for residential use. Imagine if the residential energy use was accounted for in that eighty-five percent (Davison, 2007). According to Goodell (2006), “Between 1950 and 2000, the world population increased by 140 percent and fossil fuel consumption increased by 400 percent.... [tags: Energy ]
1323 words (3.8 pages)
- 1. Introduction Due to the important of energy in the development of economic and prosperity of a country and with the growth of worldwide population and industrialization, the demand of energy has been dramatically increasing. However, the use fossil fuel to produce energy has many negative effects on the environment such as increasing the world’s carbon dioxide and depletion of fossil fuel resources which are serious issues these days. As the result, renewable energy, namely wind, solar, biomass and geothermal energy, has been encouraged by many countries as its sustainable use and not contributing to the world’s carbon dioxide emissions.... [tags: Solar energy, Photovoltaics, Solar power]
2026 words (5.8 pages)
- Energy, the ability to do work, powers the world around us. Generating of energy enables all electricity, communications, and network functions. Two methods of generating energy are through nuclear power and fossil fuels. Nuclear power and fossil fuels greatly compare regarding power production, cost of production, pollution, and imposing danger. Nuclear power plants and the burning of fossil fuels both supply significant amounts of power to the Unites States. Nuclear plants produced nineteen percent while fossil fuels produce sixty-six percent of the United State’s electricity.... [tags: power, production, cost, pollution]
706 words (2 pages)
- Modern day life is heavily reliant on electricity, lighting our rooms and streets, providing heat, and enabling us to use electronic devices easily. However, the sources from which this electricity derives from can be deadly. Coal-fired power plants play a vital role in electricity generation, fueling about 41 percent of electricity worldwide (Ball 2). Coal is known to be one of the most abundant and affordable source of power (Washburn 1). With that being said, coal-fired power plant emissions pollute our air and waters, thus negatively affecting our wildlife and human health.... [tags: sulfur and carbon dioxide]
601 words (1.7 pages)
- There are millions of people who contribute to a large bias against nuclear technology and would prefer the continued use of natural resources. The “use of nuclear power continues to be a highly debatable topic especially because of the recent developments that have resulted in the misuse of nuclear energy produced“ ( Malyshkina, 2010). In the face of nuclear energy’s societal uncertainty, this new advancement in technology offers many benefits for a world that has dwindling natural resources at a rapid rate.... [tags: argumentative]
954 words (2.7 pages)
- The world in which we live depends heavily on electricity. Our cellphones, laptops, lights, televisions, and now even some of our cars are just a few examples of the wide applications of electrical energy. For sometime we have produced this form of energy through the burning of fossil fuels to create steam and in turn create a flow of electrons by spinning an electromagnet. While the burning of these fossil fuels is effective and can be quite cost efficient, fossil fuels are a finite resource and their combustion releases a great deal of carbon dioxide into our atmosphere.... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission]
1231 words (3.5 pages)