The 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of the United States

668 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: conclucion essayon the second amendment

States tend to pass laws that promote security and safety among the people. Laws that are passed after mass-shootings occur usually have to do with increasing gun control. They can also cause a lot of debate among people questioning the constitutionality of the laws. The argument usually comes down to the second amendment giving citizens the right to bear arms. However, the wording of the amendment causes some people to misinterpret what is actually granted to the people. The anti-2nd amendment laws do not actually violate the amendment itself because it only grants the right to own guns, the laws only place limits on owning guns, and the laws are intend for the safety of the public.
The wording of the second amendment only says that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed; therefore placing restrictions on gun ownership does not violate the second amendment. Many people try to claim that they are guaranteed to always have guns and not have any restrictions as to what they can own, citing the second amendment as proof. This is not the case, as the amendment does not explicitly state restrictions cannot be placed on owning guns; it only takes away the power to ban all gun ownership in the United States. The decision that the second amendment does not protect citizens in all cases was upheld in United States v. Miller, where the court ruled that charging Jack Miller for transporting an unregistered firearm was in fact legal under the second amendment. The decision was made because there was no evidence supporting that a firearm with a barrel less than eighteen inches had any link to preserving a regulated militia (UNITED STATES v. MILLER Et Al.). The precedent set by this case shows how gun control laws can exist without viol...

... middle of paper ...

...ly examined, it reveals that nowhere does it say that all people are granted the right to bear any arms they want, wherever they want. The law only makes it illegal to take away the right to bear arms altogether. Therefore, the gun control laws that some claim violate the second amendment in fact uphold it, as it does not take away rights and it protects the public from potential damage.

Works Cited
"Action Center." NRAILA RSS. NRA-ILA, 23 Apr. 2013. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
"History of the National Firearms Act." ATF.gov. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, n.d. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
Newbern, Michael. "Students for Concealed Carry’s Statement on Virginia Tech Shooting Verdict." Students for Concealed Carry RSS. Students for Concealed Carry, 07 Nov. 2013. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
"UNITED STATES v. MILLER Et Al." LII. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.

Show More
Related

  • Gun Control is NOT the Answer to Juvenile Crime

    2300 Words  | 5 Pages

    Richman, Sheldon. "The Seen and Unseen in Gun Control." The Freeman 1 Oct 1998: 610-611

    Read More

  • Gun Control: America Needs Better Background Checks

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    Valdez, Angela and John Ferguson Jr. Gun Control: Firearms Ownership, New York: Chelsea House, 2012. 58-60. Print.

    Read More

  • Exemplification Essay: Gun Control Not the Answer

    1409 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Read More

  • Assault Rifle Ban: Weapon Control

    1593 Words  | 4 Pages

    8. Siddiqui, Sabrina. “Assault Weapons Ban, High-Capacity Magazines Measures Fail in Senate Vote.” Huffington Post, 17 April 2013. Web. 4 Feb. 2014. .

    Read More

  • Gun Control Is Unconstitutional

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    We are entitled to the right to bear arms and taking that right away would be unconstitutional. Guns are not the cause for all the violence and crimes that have happened over the years. They do not increase the death rates. Children are more likely to die in a car or swimming pool accident then gun related deaths (VerBruggen). The weapons are needed for protection and hunting, owning a gun is not unconstitutional Taking the Second Amendment away or changing it would be unconstitutional and Un American, It is like any other right. This right is one of the reasons why we are the land of the free and home of the brave. “Any society that will give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both” - Benjamin Franklin

    Read More

  • The Controversy of the Second Amendment of the Constitution

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    Anti-gun control activists interpret the Second Amendment as saying that any individual, weather he be in the military or not, should be allowed to own firearms.

    Read More

  • Gun Control.

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Gun Control problem in the United States of America is all because of the problem that we have with people not knowing how to use a gun, and the safety. The reason the laws are being brought to legislation is make sure that we protect our second amendment. Make sure that every American has the same right a bear a weapon, no matter the age but if they are fit to own a weapon.

    Read More

  • Armed Teachers and Staff in Schools

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    Severson, Kim, and Alan Blinder. "Guns at School? If There's A Will, There Are Ways." LexisNexis Academic. LexisNexis, 28 Sept. 2013. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.

    Read More

  • An Argument for Gun Control

    2438 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Web. The Web. 5 June 2015. Flynn, Michael W. “Handgun Laws.” quickanddirtytips.com. 2008.

    Read More

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Use and Permit of Handguns

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    Carter, Gregg. Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2012. Print.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

    2184 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals’ access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted.

    Read More

  • The Effects and Consequences of Gun Control

    2071 Words  | 5 Pages

    United States. Committee on the Judiciary . Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Washington: GPO, 1982. Web. 30 Nov. 2015.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography: Gun Control: Annotated Bibliography

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    In "The Effectiveness of Gun Control Laws:." the authors perform a surgical operation on the various views and issues as presented by the industry concerning gun regulation. The publication outlines the laws that have been enacted by congress concerning the regulation of firearms and shows their pros and cons. The authors suggest that there needs to be a more concerted effort by the executive as well as the judiciary so be able to enforce laws concerning firearm issuing and licensing.

    Read More

  • Gun Control

    760 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States has a long history with the establishment of gun control laws. In 1791, the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified, declaring “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” New York passed the “Sullivan Act” in 1911, which allowed someone to purchase a gun with a permit required. This was just the beginning. In 1934, Congress passed the “National Firearms Act” which gave someone a $200 tax on gun sales requiring guns to be registered with the treasury. the “Gun Control Act” was passed in 1968, outlawing mail order sales of rifles and guns. Also, Bill Clinton signed the “Violent Crime Control” and “Law Enforcement Act” into law in 1994, which banned the manufacture and sales of assault weapons. The Supreme Court in 1997 declared background checks of the “Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act” unconstitutional which has left a huge impact on society, in which guns are getting in the hands of people with mental illness. Overall, gun control laws have had a long history with the United States, with much more to come.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate.

    Read More

More about The 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of the United States

Open Document