Gender Roles: Nature Vs. Nurture?

1718 Words4 Pages

Nature versus nurture has been debated between psychologists for years and probably will be for years to come. However, both sides of the debate need to come to their sense because the human being is a product of nature and nurture. There are endless experiments to test each side’s theories; but they will never reach a law. The reason for this is because there is too many variables that cannot be controlled. Nature is what we are born with, so our genes. Then nurture is how we are impacted by our environment; these are, parents, siblings, family, peers, culture, gender, norms, child rearing, and experiences. Our genes predispose us to traits like skin color, height, and gender; we cannot change our height or skin color, but our gender is questionable. …show more content…

Gender is also defined by culture; we take on gender roles, like which bathroom you are supposed to use. Each culture has different gender roles; the United States used to see the nuclear family as a norm, but this has changed with present day gay marriage. Gender roles have been questioned and to what is gender? This all goes back to the nature versus nurture debate because gender is a production of both. Hence, human beings are a product of both their nature and nurture. The 60 Minutes special on Baby Lab, the experiment questioned if babies know between right and wrong? They tested the theory with a puppet show on three to five month old infants; examining weather infants were born with the ability or learn the difference between right and wrong. Then another study looked at children four to ten years of age with tokens for prizes; looking at weather they would chose to share the tokens with someone else or take them all for themselves. The infant study, conducted a double blind study in which the independent variable was the puppet show and how the puppets acted; the dependent variable was the infant’s consciousness between right and wrong. The five month olds reached for the good puppet a …show more content…

As the age group increased in the study it was evident that by the age of ten the children would give all their tokens to the other child, but why is this? The older children have been trained, that by giving all of the tokens away will result in something good for them in return someday. It happens all the time and we were taught to do unto others as you want done to you; so there is an incentive to treating others good and sharing. My mother used to use this line on my sister and I as kids so that we would share our toys, and it worked. Weather the children in the study were conscious of it they, may have been giving the other the person all the tokens because they saw it as the right thing to do. Why do we volunteer for different events? There is some type of incentive, weather it is getting to be at the event, getting a t-shirt, or getting the joy from helping others. In the end you are receiving a gift of some sorts. I do a lot of charity work because it makes me happy; but I also have to do it for my school scholarship, I do it to look good on a resume, and I also do it because I am Catholic and that is what the Church teaches me to be a good person. Which brings us back to the theory, are we born with the understanding between good and bad? It is a question that someday, if I am good, I will learn in heaven with all the

Open Document