Today’s medicine fully understands how human blood circulation works. However in Ancient Greece people believed that blood was related to air, springtime and cheerful personality it was also believed that liver produces all of the blood. This belief was valid until William Harvey described blood circulation more or less on the same way that we know today. He added the critical experimental finding that blood is "pumped" around the body by the heart. This founding caused a chain reaction in medicine. New findings were discovered and that led to our current understanding of the medicine we know today. If you ask a random person how Greeks thought about blood circulation only few could answer that question right because this “old” knowledge was discarded as soon as new discovery appeared. That discovery caused a paradigm shift in the natural sciences. Not only in medicine but also in biology, chemistry and physics and that is basically what paradigm shifts are all about. Some paradigm is an overarching theory shared by community of scientists, which is used to make sense of some aspects of reality. A scientific revolution or paradigm shift takes place when scientists become...
... middle of paper ...
... previous knowledge critically in order to decide if that knowledge is really worth of abundance. Luckily there are some scientists who later discover that discarded knowledge and takes it as a basis for their further research (like in Leibniz – Einstein case) that helps to establish new aspects of knowledge.
• Wikipedia. "Blood." 2014. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood#History (accessed 2 Feb 2014).
• Planetseed.com. "Medicine and the Scientific Revolution | History of Medicine | PlanetSEED." 2014. http://www.planetseed.com/relatedarticle/rise-scientific-medicine-scientific-revolution (accessed 2 Feb 2014).
• Lagemaat, Richard Van De. Theory of knowledge for the IB Diploma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
• Wikipedia. "Movie theater." 2014. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movie_theater#Spelling_and_alternative_terms (accessed 2 Feb 2014).
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- As humans, we constantly try to identify simple patterns and classify knowledge into straight forward and discrete categories. Therefore, simplicity is favoured in many areas of knowledge as it allows knowledge to be expressed in the easiest and most understandable manner. However, in certain areas of knowledge, having a simple illustration may be done at the expense of having an accurate outcome. The term ‘simplicity’ has many negative connotations attached to it, but having a simple model can be of more use to knowers than an accurate one.... [tags: Scientific method, Science, Social sciences]
1374 words (3.9 pages)
- While looking at Human Sciences and Natural Sciences as areas of knowing and memory, emotion, intuition and language as ways of knowing, we can see that shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge. Most knowledge is shared and in many cases shared knowledge exists prior to personal knowledge and plays a significant role in formulating it. Through the Human Sciences shared knowledge can be defined as knowledge that is based on cultural norms. Personal knowledge is defined as knowledge that is obtained by experience and perspective such as memories and emotions, personal knowledge can be something that an individual knows that others also know, therefore it is personal and shared, however, k... [tags: Scientific method, Theory, Science, Sociology]
1332 words (3.8 pages)
- What it is about the theories of human sciences and natural sciences that make them so convincing. When focusing on the human sciences and natural sciences, one might wonder why we believe what we believe. In general, human science can be defined as a social science, or anything that deals with human behavior in its social and cultural aspects (Bastian 190). Natural science is more often thought of as "regular" science. It is an organized undertaking that focuses on gathering knowledge about the world and condensing that knowledge into scientific laws and theories that can be tested (Bastian 153).... [tags: Scientific Theory, Psychology]
1589 words (4.5 pages)
- The human sciences and natural sciences are considered knowledge by many worldwide, as their arguments having convinced people one way or another. While the natural sciences focus on swaying belief by showing duplicable evidence through a strict and standardized methodology, the human sciences focus on explaining how things are and how they came to be using logic, reason, and an understanding of human behavior. Beginning with the scientific revolution in the fifteen hundreds, the Western world has become accustomed to accepting knowledge that is backed by the scientific method, a method that has been standardized worldwide for the most accurate results.... [tags: Science, Knowledge]
1280 words (3.7 pages)
- Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss. We make decisions all the time. Similarly, there are decisions in various areas of knowledge whether it would be the arts or the natural sciences. Natural sciences is the area that is seeking for patterns. Meanwhile the arts is the area that is more broad and subjective. However, both areas of knowledge are affected by the decisions people make. These decisions are associated with the ethical judgments in society.... [tags: knowledge, decisions, arts, sciences]
1452 words (4.1 pages)
- Explain the argument for each side of this issue, then describe your own view. Social sciences are the analysis methodically of the social area of the world. They are mixed area of study of human behavior and society which include disciplines of anthropology, economics, political science, psychology and sociology. Social sciences study methodically the manner in which people behave and how they influence the world around us. It aims to comprehend any given social phenomena by using a methodology borrowed from the physical sciences.... [tags: research approach]
966 words (2.8 pages)
- Would you say someone is knowledgeable about matter x if that person has no justification to back such claims. Wouldn’t it be foolish to undoubtedly believe a fortune teller, to place your bets on reason less predictions. I simply ask you to be wise, as wise as the wisest of men, as wise as Socrates for he knew he knew nothing. Today, two thousand sixteen years later we possess just about as much knowledge as he did. Surprisingly it would come to me if someone would not argue otherwise. Arguments backup up by medical advancements, technology, and multiple discoveries in the natural sciences.... [tags: Truth, Epistemology, Reality, Plato]
797 words (2.3 pages)
- Theories are unproven hypotheses that serve as explanations for observations and events, so they must have a way of convincing people that they are true. A theory’s objectives are to explain and predict a phenomenon. Most ideas are not convincing without solid evidence or proof. The human sciences and natural sciences have different ways of showing the validity of a hypothesis. The natural sciences, which include subject areas such as physics, chemistry, and biology, depend on physical proof through experiments with several trials.... [tags: Science]
1468 words (4.2 pages)
- The art of convincing and persuading is highly subjective. The process of either coercion or blandishment is determined by different factors that vary depending on the individuals that are being addressed. Scientific theories are pragmatic presuppositions, suppositions that deal with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is based on practical rather than theoretical considerations. When we break down a fact, there are a series of specific elements that make it up, and appeal to different categories of individuals, thus making this fact believable and convincing for certain people, and not for others.... [tags: Science]
1072 words (3.1 pages)
- When looking at the human sciences and natural sciences, one may question the validity of a claim or choose to support it without any evidentiary support. For many years, science has been accepted by many as the dominant cognitive paradigm, or model of knowledge. In fact, there are also people who believe that science is the only pathway for gaining knowledge, and if something isn’t provable through science, then it should not be accepted. A person might ask, what is it about the human sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing.... [tags: Human Intellect, Science]
1199 words (3.4 pages)
- The Primacy of the Holy Spirit in the Soteriology and Doctrine of Grace of John Wesley & Contemporary Approaches to Wesleyan Soteriology
- Agile Development Methodology
- The History and Culture of Black Jews in America
- Evaluation of Health System Verses Performance
- How Successful Is The War On Drugs?
- The Google Case: Aiming for an Evolutionary Advantage