Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
importance of assessment in teaching
role of assessment in the process of teaching and learning
effectiveness of assessment for learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: importance of assessment in teaching
The purpose of this case study is to understand the importance of assessments within key stage one and how recent changes made to the national curriculum and assessments reflect on pupils learning. This case study investigation will aim to acknowledge whether pupils in key stage one are emotionally and cognitively prepared to take assessment. Hence, this case study will aim to recognise the implications the new changes may have on teaching professionals who are required to support and ensure that every pupil within key stage one is meeting the required target grades (Smith and Huntley, 2015) therefore, in order to recognise the importance of assessments for teaching staff and pupils in key stage one, there will be three research questions which …show more content…
Many literatures will be used to support my research as Ridley (2012) and Fink (2014) put forward the importance of carrying out a literature review in any research because it will help improve, structure as well as strengthen the research by getting a better prospective of the chosen topic. Although, there is very little research carried out on assessments for pupils in key stage one which is one of the reasons for this case study investigation to be formed as it aims to get a better prospective towards the importance of assessments and whether the level of emphasis placed on assessment is necessary for both pupils in regards to their age and the influence it may have on teaching …show more content…
In “1991” (Gipps et al., 1995, p.2) assessments were introduced for pupils in key stage one to assess pupils knowledge at “5-7” years old (Gipps et al., 1995, p.3) whereby, different activities such reading where taken place throughout the classroom to enhance pupils cognitive development. These assessments where known as “standard assessment tests” (Gipps et al., 1995, p.51) which help identify whether pupils have made progress within subjects like maths, English and science. Gipps et al., (1995) puts forward that being able to assess pupils learning it amended how teaching professionals would teach pupils because by observing pupils and being able to understand their strengths and weaknesses, teaching professionals can form appropriate activities which will help improve pupils cognitive development but also teaching professionals gain a better understanding of how to support pupils learning from the changes made to the national
Research carried out by Ofsted (2011) shows that, assessment improved a practitioner’s awareness of a child’s strengths and weaknesses. Subsequently, this had a positive influence on their planning, as they were able to differentiate and offer adequate support for children. Ofsted believes it to be the best way to improve pupil’s attainment (Ofsted, 2011).
This article, initiated by the Assessment Group of the British Educational Research Association, focuses on how improving formative assessment raises standards and how there is still room for improvement. It discusses the importance of self and peer assessments and effective teaching. They also identified four ways to implement classroom policies to improve formative assessment.
While standardized tests are problematic at all ages and levels of schooling, they are especially questionable in primary grades. In these years children's growth is idiosyncratic (Russel, 2002). Skills needed for school's success are in their most vulnerable stage. Failure at this age can be devastating. 'My six year old is already crying himself to sleep at night worrying about his SATs,' states Mark Adams from BBC news (2003, p.1). It is necessary for teachers, school administrators, and parents to strongly argue that testing in the early years must end and testing in the years following must be reduced.
Assessment for learning informs and promotes the achievement of all pupils, as it encourages them to take responsibility for their own learning. It focuses on the learning process and how to improve a child’s academic progression, finding out where pupils are within a learning range, where they need to go and how best to get them there. Lots of different assessment for learning strategies can be used to help pupils in their learning, and these can be adopted by teachers to gain an understanding of what has been achieved and what steps should be taken next in order to progress learning forward.
Once I decided on what kind of assessment I wanted to use, I then wrote out how I would administer each piece and created the necessary worksheets to go along with them. I tried to incorporate multiple forms of assessment – the structure of worksheets, the freedom of journals, and discussion to talk through thoughts and issues – to provide students with numerous methods of expressing themselves and multiple opportunities to create connections with the material. I also made an effort to give students the chance to work in small groups, as a whole class, and independently so they could support each other’s learning to help make meaning from the content then put it into practice on their own.
...g against inspection of children's attainment in the formal areas of mathematics and English have passed. Viewing the Early Years Foundation stage (EYFS) (2012) the position that assessment is a fundamental to early years practice can be supported. Set criteria are in place to standardise children's abilities. Standardised and universal summative assessment is described as narrowed down but necessary on a National level to identify any areas for improvement. As a measure, "each child’s learning and development is ‘emerging’, ‘expected’, or ‘exceeding’ against the descriptors for each goal". The goals described are wide and far reaching. From the National Strategies programme Social and Emotional Aspects of Development (SEAD), measuring Self-confidence and self-awareness; Managing feelings and behaviour; and Making relationships and understanding others.
Marshall and Drummond (2006) states that the King’s Medway Oxfordshire Formative Assessment Project (KMOFAP) work examines the four major areas are related to formative assessment including questioning, feedback, sharing criteria with pupil, and peer and self-assessment. The assessment are closely associated with the ‘classroom practices’ that stands for everything that teachers and learners actually do in the schools (Drummond, 2003). Black and Wiliam (1998a, p.16) argued that ‘the quality of interaction learning between [ learner and teacher]...is heart of pedagogy. Teachers need to know their learners’ progress and obstacles in their development, it is necessary for instructors to reroute their work to raise progression and tackle these
“Assessment is one of the most effective instructional strategies to increase learning.” (Edutopia)When teachers think about assessment quality, they often focus on the accuracy of the instrument itself- the scope of which the assessment item tasks and scoring rubrics produce accurate information. It is imperative to use the different testing technique to improve learning. By taking tests, students can establish that they are independently capable of expressing their understanding of the material. I will have an opportunity to analyze each student's understanding and ability to apply learned information. I can then decide whether the
Assessment has been the greatest challenge in my development as a professional. My coursework as supported my growth in this area, especially in understanding the broad range of assessments used to support students’ growth and development. My courses have also supported my understanding of how ongoing observational assessment and standards-based measures can be used to inform instruction and support the cycle of observation, reflection and planning. Coursework
Assessment, in the context of education, was defined by Lambert, D (2000, pag 4) as the processs of gathering, recording and using information about pupils' responses to educational tasks. Despite some can consider that assessment is separated from the learning process, assessment is, in fact, an essential part of the learning proccess. Maguire, M. and Dillon, J. (2007, pag 213) pointed out that assessment is intrincately bound-up in the teaching-learning cycle.
There are different methods and uses of assessment that are used in the Education system, the reason for this, is that not all assessments serve the same purpose for its methodologies, the feedback that learners receive needs to correspond with the purpose of the assessment. (Sieborger, 1998)Thus educators tend to make use of multiple assessments to establish a fair and just measurement of the learner’s capability. This essay will extensively describe and analyse the tensions between the two methods of assessment: Summative assessment and Formative assessment and further reflect on their ability to integrate.
As teachers, we have to monitor the progress our students make each day, week, quarter and year. Classroom assessments are one of the most crucial educational tools for teachers. When assessments are properly developed and interpreted, they can help teachers better understand their students learning progress and needs, by providing the resources to collect evidence that indicates what information their students know and what skills they can perform. Assessments help teachers to not only identify and monitor learners’ strengths, weaknesses, learning and progress but also help them to better plan and conduct instruction. For these reasons, ongoing classroom assessment is the glue that binds teaching and learning together and allows educators to monitor their efficacy and student learning.
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
Assessment is a tool used in the classroom every day. It is used to measure a student’s mastery of a skill or knowledge of a given subject. It is also what demonstrates to the teacher what the students have learned. Educators use that information to determine if they need to re-teach to a specific student, group, or the entire class. They can also use that information to determine the rate of their teaching. Assessments are important because, as teachers, we need to know what difficulties our students have and what needs to be refined for them. While I do believe in assessment and feel that it is one of the key components of teaching, I am more concerned with a child’s process of learning rather than the overall product that comes from it. This is where grades come in for me. Grades determine the students’ level of mastery on a subject, nothing more. Grades should not be the exclusive indicators that a student has learned the information that is presented to them. It is the things a student learns along the way that truly matter and sometimes cannot be measured.
As I reflect on my past assessment process, I realized how much my assessments have changed over the years. In my early years, I used tests for informational recall as my assessments. I felt these were appropriate guidelines in which I needed to follow in order to substantiate a student’s grade. Every assignment or tests was given a point value and then based on the amount of points, a grade was given. Every student’s assessment was exactly the same, and the assessments did not contain any subjectivity. I felt confident in giving the grade based on a valid point system. However reflecting back, I see that I did not include any performance-based assessments or individual learning styles in my early assessment. I also did not take into consideration the individual needs of my students. My assessment approach was awful. I am embarrassed that I use to assess students in this manner.