National Culture of Managers: Understanding People´s Value

1879 Words4 Pages

Introduction
This report will argue that Sylvie Chevrier (2009), study of the relevance of national culture to international managers is an interesting but programmatic piece of research. The article questioned the significance of national culture to managers faced with a global business, claiming that “large parts of people’s behaviour cannot be explained by cultural values or shared perception, and called for a different definition of national culture”. The article is broken down into four sections. The first defined and explains the difference between political and national culture. The second section uses Switzerland as an example to examine the significance of national political culture. The third section of the report demonstrates the link between political culture and management practice in Switzerland. The fourth and final section examines the effects and implications of tenacious national culture for managers

Brief description of the paper being evaluated

The aim of the article is to propose political culture as an alternative approach to understanding people’s values, norms or shared believes in a given society or country. The study finds that the concept of national culture does not exist and, therefore cannot be applied globally. Especially in a country like Switzerland which is divided by various linguistic and religious internal borders. Claiming the lack of a strong national culture and difficult communication has caused different regions to remain private and form small political communities. This makes it hard for national culture to exit in such a country and creates many challenges and obstacles for managers of international business. However the article states that the existence of political cultural val...

... middle of paper ...

... better get our points across. The benefits of these changes where clear to see, we had a much more organise team, we worked and establish our objectives together, explain roles and promote team responsibility. The overall productivity and creativity of the team changes which enables us to achieve our goal in the end.

In conclusion Chevrier has attempted to prove that culture cannot be applied at national and called for an alternative to national culture in today’s business world. Difference exits within small regions of a country. The Switzerland case study is used to display this. Claiming people have a more sense of belonging to their regions rather than the country. Unfortunately for chevier the research she undertook isn’t broad enough to support the claims she made, or even answer the, is national culture still relevant to management in a global context?

Open Document