Antidotes In The Method Of Learning By Jerome Bruner

1137 Words3 Pages

Antidotes
It was my first lecture in the university, having previously gone through a university experience; I was expecting a very similar experience. However the setting was completely different the sitting arrangement was in a group form, the lecture room was arranged in an unconventional (informal) way more like a social setting, the method of learning contrast everything I was used to. I was wondering how I am going to cope as well as get the best from the lecture. We were ask to write about our previous leaning experiencing highlighting both our failures and success and what they could be attributed to. At the beginning I did not know what is expected of me as I was confused.
The lecturer from time to time introduces new concept and make sure the conversation was focused and contextual.
We were asked at different times to get into a group discussion, talking about different aspect of the lecture. It was a challenging experience, hence …show more content…

The learner chooses as well as modified information, formulates hypotheses, and able to decide, doing so with the aid of cognitive frameworks (design.org, 2013). This also in line with Piaget theory.
My learning experience does fit in with the outlined theory.
Pros and cons
• Pros
• students level of thinking and reasoning, improves
• student self-esteem is boosted
• Exposure to diversify perspective and being able to understand them can only be a good thing
• It prepares student for team work in the world of work.
• It helps students motivation as students have the feeling that their contributions are
• Cons
• People learn at different pace
• Uncomfortable for quiet learners
• People may not get along
• Time can be wasted talking about irrelevant topics
• It is a burden for students to be responsible for each other’s learning

More about Antidotes In The Method Of Learning By Jerome Bruner

Open Document