Comparison Of Winston Churchill And Mr. Obama's Speech

Winston Churchill had an active speech in the House and the British people. Winston Churchill started his speech reminding the progress of the battles in France, where 25 divisions could not stand up the attack of the enemy at Sedan and on the Meuse at the border with Belgium. Even though he sent the men as fast as he could, France lost the war in two weeks and became a Nazi land. This reminder was to give an example of the facts that are futile and harmful. As a matter of fact, he wanted the citizen to think in the future and do not remember their stories about the old battles and their victory. This war was the fiercest and the most dangerous of the existence of the British Empire. He declared the House about this catastrophe which he believed

This ascendant speech became the outline of any adventurous politician to convince the audience these days. For instance, either the previous Presidents of US or the present President Mr. Obama use this technique to achieve their victory in the presidential campaigns. There is the Iranian Nuclear file that has an important matter at Mr. Obama, represents the similarity between Churchill’s speeches and Mr. Obama’s ones. In February 2009, according to Michael Makovsky and Blaise Misztal, two journalists at The Washington Post, that Mr. Obama pledged “to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.”13 This decision could change after a few years, and it is not the final one. December 7, 2013, according to Michael D. Shear, a journalist at The New York Times, “President Obama said that he could envision a final diplomatic agreement with Iran that would let the country’s government enrich nuclear material for power production with enough restrictions to assure Israel and the rest of the world that it could not produce a nuclear weapon.”14 The diplomatic speech has changed 90º from prevention to acceptance of restrictions, and that is not all. Moreover, April 7, 2015, according to Steve Inskeep, a journalist at NPR, Mr. Obama “would argue that this deal is the right thing to do for the United States, for our allies in the region and for world peace regardless of the nature of the Iranian regime.”15 After six years of the first speech of Mr. Obama and negotiation with the Iranian, the President accepted to let the Iranian have Nuclear to peaceful uses. This diplomatic speech gave the Iranian what they are looking for, and at the same time the US achieved the best deal with 180º in a different direction without using Air Forces to bomb the nuclear facilities. Furthermore, this fact is as a result of the Churchill’s speech technique which has