The movie that I’ve worked on is called The Man from U.N.C.L.E directed by Guy Ritchie, 47-year-old English Filmmaker known for his crime genre films. The genre for this movie also falls in crime but it’s got a mixture of adventure and comedy to go with it. The movie was released in August of this year and in a few months the movie has grossed $108 million in the box office after having $75 million to spend. A lot of people have gone against the movie by saying that the movie didn’t live up to their expectations and was not what they had in mind. The movie is set in the time period of 1960s when the cold war was taking place between powers of the Western and Eastern bloc. The movie features Henry Cavill as Napoleon Solo, Armie Hammer as IIIya Kuryakin, and Alicia Vikander as Gabriella “Gaby” Teller all the main Character names of the popular show of late 1960s. The story is by Jeff Kleeman and Lionel Wigram, they are also the producers of the film …show more content…
This movie really made me thing that if I was going to peruse my career in film then these are the kind of people I want to work with and create movies that are different, something that someone can only watch once but that once is enough. Movies that make the viewer wishing for more at the end. This movie had me feeling that way, it felt like as if I was starting to picture myself going into the line of work in which I would have a lot of options. There are motifs in the movie such as Alicia having an uncle as this man that can take her to her father which refers to the title which I found to be very cleaver and honestly I think that this movie was something different that has been missing from the multiplex and that’s why it has become my favourite film until another great takes it spot, for that I guess I just have to
The film is a fairly faithful adaptation of the book. The amateurish style of the book gives it some appeal as a more sleek and sophisticated style wouldn’t evoke a sense of angst’ desperation and confusion that the novel does.
This movie was beautifully produced. I don’t believe another director could have done as good of a job as Luis Puenzo did. I believe Puenzo was able to bring this story to life and allow us to be able to really relate to each character intricately because he lived through the uncertainty and witnessed the agony faced by many, and he made all of the emotions real through this work. I also believe that having actors and actresses that lived through the experience was an excellent move.
The movie is, most likely, done well enough to intrigue its intended audience. It captured the theme and story line of the book. It falls short, though, when compared to the beautiful, sensitive and contemplative prose of Natalie Babbitt. One could only hope that a viewing of the film will lead the watcher to try the book and be delighted all the more.
All in all, it was a pleasure reading the novel and watching the film. They were distinctive in the manner how they portrayed the story but they were unique since they managed to get the idea of the story across in two disparate ways. My feelings for the story have overgrown because it is such an attractive and innovative piece of writing, with a glowing sense of grief and helplessness and reality, which force the reader to involve with the hauntings of Arthur.
This movie was inspiring and encouraging to anyone who is struggling with something. Overcoming his controversies in life became the main point of the movie. Knowing that this movie was based upon a true story inspires the people even more.
The movie teaches us to look beyond the cover and into who someone is as a person. We also learn that sometimes contact with people makes us reconsider our judgement towards them, to find out the real person underneath.
This movie portrays an excellent look at the problems we all face. When I first saw this at I related completely to Conrad's character, the feeling of wanting to escape everything even if it means taking your own life. While watching the movie I was able to relate to the adults and could really feel for them a lot more than I thought I would. Each character has a unique sense of reality to them. The actors really carry the film, making the characters seem like real people we've known for years. The reality of the movie is so heartbreaking and so real that you feel every emotion and understand the characters feelings, whether you liked them or not. Growing up in America, the film rings many a truth to the insights of what people perceive as a "normal family".
In one particular scene, director was truly a great one, featuring special focus on his dad life and the Colorado River. It was so cool to highlights of the movie by one of his favorite poem written by his dad when he was born, the Important Place. Also, this film was a good length, not excessively long but long enough to tell the story. This is really important today there were no such unwanted scene in the film, which literary the most closely and accurately delivered. In my opinion, this film is forced to possess the characters of a great aspect, and turns to make for quite the adventurous. There was no special character encounter rather than his dad, learned something from the secret Colorado River. Another great aspect of the film was the special footage that were introduce in this film was an enjoyable aspect to be a good documentary film, and that’s how this film is different from the rest.
When deciding what movie to do for this particular paper I faced a few issues. I knew what the requirements were, but I wanted something different and something I could have fun watching and writing as well. So, after looking around and pondering movies for weeks I finally decided on a perfect choice The 60’s directed by Mark Piznarski?
This autobiographical touch, and the documentary style gives the film an emotional focus and depth that never goes out of style - and that is why the film still touches audiences today.
The 1991 movie My Girl tells the story of 11-year-old Vada Sultenfuss who, having lost her mother at birth , lives with her dementia-ridden grandmother and her job-oriented father in the funeral parlour that he owns and operates. The story follows Vada, an extreme hypochondriac who has many strange misconceptions about death, through a variety of life-changing experiences, including the engagement of her father and the devastating loss of her best friend, Thomas Jay. Through these experiences, the audience witnesses Vada’s social, emotional, and intellectual growth, as well as her changing views of death.
was a spectacular film there were some things that I did not enjoy like, the
This film really focuses on the characters. Their thoughts, anger, distress, and mistakes become part of your mistakes. This deals with a father’s s priority and how he will achieve that priority by using unethical ways like torturing an innocent man. Bringing up child abduction and torture are
The movie is a very moving, sensitive and emotional story of redemption. The tale of how a young heartless thug can change into a softhearted guardian. This demonstrates that despite the poor living conditions, awful events and how heartless someone may seem. You can adapt to your surroundings and situations, you can also transform your life. Everyone has good in them you just choose whether to value it and utilize it or not appreciate it and discard it.
First of all, I was touched by the following statement “ You can be mad as a mad dog at the way things went. You can swear, curse the fates, regret everything you ever did but when it comes to the end. You have to let it go”. Actually, I was in a gloomy mood before I watched this film, something really grieved happened and I was lost and confused. I cursed the fate and blame everyone and everything include myself. Nevertheless, the word “let it go” helped me lay my burdens down and I understood that something I had to accept truth which had happened and let it