Differences Between Amerelie And Amélie

1442 Words3 Pages

Sound and Editing are two factors that can affect our movie watching experience. They usually work together to push the story forward, determine how fast or slow the pace of the film should be, and what mood should the audience feel. In this paper, we will be specifically focusing on sound and editing of the films Hugo and compare it with the film Amélie, which both at least nominated in best sound and best video editing. These two films both used different elements and techniques in terms of sound and editing that I think it would be interesting to discuss. Hugo used continuity editing elements to provide the storyline and affects the pacing. First, the editing simulated Hugo’s point of view to let us see what Hugo sees. This phenomenon …show more content…

First, both Hugo and Amélie used visual effects to externalize a character’s emotion. For instance, when Hugo was having a bad dream that he turned into a robot, visual effects here visualized his fears. The same technique was used in Amélie too, just like the scene when Amelie was disappointed that Nino left. Amelie straight up turned into a puddle of water. Visual effects are used in both of the films because the filmmakers want the audience to interpret the film in a specific way. Since Hugo is a fantasy film, the filmmakers don’t necessary to make everything realistic. On the other hand, since we’re focusing on Amélie’s own world, visual effects are used to visualize what she is thinking. Hugo and Amélie used visual effects not just to stimulate the audience vision and help them interpret the story and let us listen to the character’s inner …show more content…

The biggest difference I noticed is the general narrative style of the films. In Amélie, there is an omniscient narrator when the film started. The narrator told us a lot of things about Amélie straight away. He talked about her family, her habits and so on. The narrator here helped to depict the image of Amélie. In comparison, the filmmakers of Hugo chose not to use a narrator to the film, we get to know Hugo by looking at the surroundings and how he reacts to things around him. These two techniques can both push the story forward, the only difference is that the filmmakers used different tools to explain the story and it affected the way we interpret the

Open Document