Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
theories that rationalize the universality of the incest taboo
theories that rationalize the universality of the incest taboo
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“We can’t allow gays to marry! What would be next? Incest?” Opponents of gay marriage frequently cite a common philosophical fallacy known as the "slippery slope", to relate same-sex unions to incestuous relations. According to the Purdue University writing center, a slippery slope is defined as “a conclusion based on the premise that if A happens, then eventually through a series of small steps, through B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too, basically equating A and Z” (“Logical Fallacies”). However, we often ignore the true moral implications of these “next level” immoralities we would slip into. Incest, in nearly all modern cultures and faiths, is considered wrong, including the Catholic Church. But like so many facets of morality, incest is a topic that must be clearly looked at on all sides of the issue.
It is important at this point to establish that for the purposes of this moral comparison, incest will be defined as “sexual intercourse between persons so closely related that they are forbidden by law to marry” (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). Furthermore, with full knowledge that many incestuous relationships referenced in moral discussion are not entered into consensually, for the purposes of a more interesting moral argument, all incestuous relationships in this comparison shall be hypothetically consensual, meaning that all parties involved are willingly and knowledgably entering into relationships. Finally, because a frequent argument against incest calls upon the entirely possible risk of genetically deformed offspring, this comparison will hypothetically contain incestuous relationships that are aware of and take action against procreation. In summary, all incest in this paper is referring to entirely consensual relatio...
... middle of paper ...
...Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
Doherty, Niall. "Incest, Happiness, and Other Unquestioned Assumptions." Web log post. Incest, Happiness, and Other Unquestioned Assumptions. N.p., 12 Aug. 2012. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
Herzog, Hal. "The Problem With Incest: Evolution, Morality, and the Politics of Abortion." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 09 Oct. 2012. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
"Incest." Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
Lewis, C. S. The Four Loves. N.p.: HarperCollins, 1960. Print.
Lieberman, Debra, Dr., and Adam Smith. "It’s All Relative: Sexual Aversions and Moral Judgments Regarding Sex Among Siblings." Current Directions in Psychological Science. Association of Psychological Science, 2012. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
"Purdue OWL: Logic in Argumentative Writing." Purdue Online Writing Lab. Purdue University, 11 Mar. 2013. Web. 10 Jan. 2014.
If the new legislation were passed the law would also specify that incest is “sexual intercourse or sodomy” between “grandparent of the whole blood or half blood, aunt of the whole blood or the half blood, uncle of the whole blood or the half blood”(House Bill 534). The legislation also repeals “any laws or parts of laws in conflict” with the bill (House Bill 534). The most recent log in this bill’s status history was on April the second of 2015 when it was “House Withdrawn, Recommitted”(House Bill
Incest is not something that happens to “those people over there” the ones across town who don’t wash very often. It happens to all strata of society, at all economic levels, and in all ethnic groups.
Haugen, David, Susan Musser, and Kacy Lovelace, . Abortion. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2010.
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
Frohock, F.M (1983) Abortion: A Case Study in Law and Morals. United States of America: Greenwood Press. Retrieved on June 9, 2008.
Hinman, Lawrence. “Abortion: A Guide to the Ethical Issues.” May 13, 2010. University of San
2. Life in the Balance: Exploring the Abortion Controversy, Robert N. Wennberg, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. 1985.
Milbauer, Barbara. The Law Giveth: Legal Aspects of the Abortion Controversy. Atheneum, New York: 1983.
Baird, Robert M., and Stuart E. Rosenbaum. The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1989. Print.
Jost, Kenneth, and Kathy Koch. "Abortion Showdowns." CQ Researcher 22 Sept. 2006: 769-92. Web. 12 Apr. 2011.
Brief Guide to Argument. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 8 ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2014. 125-128. Print.
Royzman, E., Leeman, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). "You make me sick": Moral dyspepsia as a reaction to third party sibling incest. 101-107.
"Abortion." Current Issues: Macmillan Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Feb. 2014.
... males’ sexual advances, and the victims of incest may plan their pregnancies as a means of escaping from their victimization” (Roosa, Tein, Reinholtz and Angelini 120).
The incest taboo is, therefore, a cultural trait. Protective of the efficient mechanism of the family, society sought to minimize disruption to its activities and to the clear flows of authority, responsibilities, material wealth and information horizontally and vertically. Incest threatened to unravel this magnificent creation. Alarmed by the possible consequences (internal and external feuds, a rise in the level of aggression and violence) – society introduced the taboo. It came replete with physical and emotional sanctions: stigmatization, revulsion and horror, imprisonment, the demolition of the errant and socially mutant family cell. As long as societies revolve around the relegation of power, its sharing, its acquisition and dispensation – there will always exist an incest taboo. But in a different society and culture, it is conceivable not to have such a taboo. This would be either utopian or dystopian, depending on the reader.