Morality Is Not A Science Essay

Morality Is Not A Science Essay

Length: 2354 words (6.7 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

Chapter 1:

Morality is not a science; it is an ever-changing view of what is right and wrong, good from bad throughout the course of human life. Science deals with facts, measures of values, where there are only “personal” opinions. Morality is subjective, where I don’t believe that there is such thing as moral facts. People disagree/ agree over ethical questions all the time, it is subjective matter. In a subjective matter, the speaker conveys feelings, where as in a scientific matter, the speaker would report facts (tested/proven). I feel that there are no moral facts for this exact reason, when we say something is wrong or right, we are expressing what our personal approval or disapproval may be, although their might be a common consensus, a personal view is shown. Examples of opinions could be “All men are created equal” or “Copying someone’s test is wrong”, or “Drug dealers are bad people”. These are commonly used phrases/ saying that have no proof of being correct.

There are not right and wrong answers about good and bad things, these again are subjective opinions that someone can form. Again, there are no moral facts to show what is actually right and wrong, and people hold all types of opinions on various debates that arise. It is impossible to prove that one moral opinion is better than the other. The power of reasoning can be used to discover what these answers are, although they are not definite answers, just opinions. “Laws of nature” can be the same everywhere but the rules of conduct change and differ from place to place, where shows that the power of reasoning must be used. I feel as if the power of reasoning leads someone to believe whether they should or should not agree with that fact. For instance, “Abortio...

... middle of paper ...

...its receive”. The vices are immoral in this context, more of a description of the bee’s selfish character however. The luxuries that they have made within the hive feed their ongoing pride to continue the selfish behavior and greed, they continue reaping the benefits, where as others in society are not mentioned and do not reap the benefits. To me, Mandeville’s conclusion connects perfectly to the “spontaneous order”, there is order, but it is self centered in the case of the vices, yet benefits the group of selfish individuals. “Greed, pride, ambition” will absolutely make people want to continue to get the best deals, more and more, which as I said before would stimulate the economy.

Works Cited for Chapter 2:

Graham, Gordon. “Chapter Two” Theories of Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy with a Selection of Classical Readings. (2011). New York: Routledge

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Science and morality Essay

- Progression is a natural occurrence in human life as well as society. Natural curiosity, coupled with a desire for self improvement, has propelled mankind into the age of science and technology. As society progresses, so, too, does human life continue to advance and improve. Medical advances have allowed humans to overcome disease and illness, and ultimately prolog human life. For example, the success of stem cell research has granted doctors the resources to replace damaged cells and begin to repair severe injuries....   [tags: Scientific Research]

Strong Essays
1309 words (3.7 pages)

John Stuart Mills : An Epistemological Problem Of Science Or Morality Essay

- Mills begins by letting his reader know that we have not learned anything from the Philosopher of the past. H does not believe that from Socrates to 1801 we made no progress in finding the greatest happiness. Mills beliefs are, we are the ones making our selves, that there is no apposing force like a god. We do this on the bases of a goal, which is different form Kant’s ultimate Goal. Al though he does believe that the only end to life is happiness, but this is a different from what Aristotle thought as the greatest happiness....   [tags: Ethics, John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism]

Strong Essays
706 words (2 pages)

Aristotle And Plato 's Views On Morality, Politics And Science Essay

- Aristotle and Plato were once philosophers in Ancient Greece who studied to a great extent ethics, politics and science. Aristotle was influenced by Plato as Aristotle was his student, just as Socrates, another big Greek philosopher, influenced Plato. Although, their ideas may be obsolete by modern standards, they still continue to have historical value. Thus, these ancient notions are often explored as they molded modern thinking to what it is today. Regularly examined, The Republic, by Plato and Politics by Aristotle, were each written in attempt at explaining political theory....   [tags: Logic, Aristotle, Inductive reasoning, Reason]

Strong Essays
721 words (2.1 pages)

Essay on Science, Morality and Responsibility in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

- Science vs. Morality and Responsibility in Frankenstein The most frightening horror story can only be called such if it is believable. Nothing is so unnerving as lying awake at night with very real fears. No monster can harm you, unless the monster was genetically engineered by a mad scientist. The theme of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein - scientific investigation without consideration of morality and responsibility - is a very relevant topic in today's world. This theme, along with the less obvious themes of revenge, prejudice against deviation from the norm, and fate all make Frankenstein one of the most unique and terrifying horror novels ever....   [tags: Frankenstein essays]

Strong Essays
2006 words (5.7 pages)

Science, Technology, and Morality in Shelley's Frankenstein Essay

- Frankenstein and Science Science is the knowledge gained by a systematic study, knowledge which then becomes facts or principles. In the systematic study; the first step is observation, the second step hypothesis, the third step experimentation to test the hypothesis, and lastly the conclusion whether or not the hypothesis holds true. These steps have been ingrained into every student of science, as the basic pathway to scientific discovery. This pathway holds not decision as to good or evil intention of the experiment....   [tags: Frankenstein essays]

Strong Essays
1101 words (3.1 pages)

Technology and Morality in Shelley's Frankenstein - The Advancement of Science

- Frankenstein and the Advancement of Science       Science is nothing more than facts and principles that have been accepted on the basis of the knowledge gained by a systematic study. The scientific process is the common, basic pathway to this discovery of knowledge. The good or evil implications resulting from knowledge is not the primary concern of the scientist, though these implications can have a powerful impact. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein shows how the discovery of knowledge can have earth-shattering repercussions when a scientist does not consider the consequences of his actions....   [tags: Frankenstein essays]

Strong Essays
1131 words (3.2 pages)

Science and Morality in Shelley's Frankenstein - Consequences of Technology

- The Consequences of Technology Revealed in Shelley's Frankenstein       In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, written in the late nineteenth century, the author proposes that knowledge and technology can be dangerous to individuals and all of humanity.  Frankenstein was one of the first cautionary tales about scientific research.  Shelley's novel offers profound insight of the consequences of morally insensitive scientific and technological research.   Learn from me. . . at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how  much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow...   [tags: Frankenstein essays]

Free Essays
1685 words (4.8 pages)

Science, Technology, and Morality as Perceived in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

-    In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley challenges the motives and ethical uncertainties of the scientific developments of her time. This critique has become increasingly relevant as modern scientists endeavor into previously unimagined realms of the natural world through the use of cloning and genetic engineering. Through careful analysis, we can see how the novel illustrates both the potential dangers of these exploits and the irony of the conflicts between science and creationism.      Prior to the birth of the story, Mary Shelley had begun to learn of advancements and speculation in the scientific world of the early nineteenth century; in Frankenstein's introduction, editor M....   [tags: Frankenstein essays]

Strong Essays
1968 words (5.6 pages)

`` Frankenstein `` By Marry Shelley : A Story Of The Monster Essays

- Before or after an action is completed, the question of right or wrong arises. To be clear, morals are the fundamentals of judging right and wrong, however, ethics are the fundamentals of right behavior. Having morals is what defines human beings, by knowing what’s right and wrong. Ethics help with decision making and increase the chances of staying on the right path, not doing wrong. Being ethical, impacts society as well, because ethics sometimes surpass laws in keeping society safe. Sometimes ethics triumph over some unjust laws....   [tags: Ethics, Morality, Science, Bioethics]

Strong Essays
1674 words (4.8 pages)

Technology and Morality in Shelley's Frankenstein - Victor's Use of Science

- Victor Frankenstein and His Use of Science Every spring there is a plethora of new animate beings. Creation is a yearly event for most animals. There are countless children born each day. All living beings procreate. Victor Frankenstein was a scientist, and the goal of science is to discover new information, and Victor Frankenstein was simply being a scientist and creating new information. When Victor Frankenstein created his monster, it could be compared to genetic engineering or cloning of today....   [tags: Frankenstein essays]

Free Essays
938 words (2.7 pages)