To have a better understanding of morality it 's best to look at the word’s root word: moral. Having morals is defined as having good character and how that person interacts with others. Having morals is to have morality. Morals are usually based on a person’s social values, either good or bad. Society “correctly” defines having morals as “being in accordance with what is just, good, or proper and conforming to accepted standards of behavior”. I think the whole concept of morality is off. This version of morality is like a lost child unable to find their parents. How are you supposed to know what’s moral; when you’re unsure of what exactly society considers “good or proper”? And who these standards of behaviors are accepted by? Thus, leaving us with a bit of a problem of being unable to interpret morality in a different way.
Think about this. If a mother kills her son because she heard human meat was delicious, so she cut up his body, cooked him, and ate him for dinner. Did she do something wrong? Most people would probably consider a mother killing her son and then eating him as immoral. But is it truly immoral? When you take into account that morality is defined as what is “good or proper and the accepted standards of behavior”, it seems that this behavior is accepted by her, so should therefore be considered “proper behavior”.
Ultimately, before we can decide whether the situation above is immoral or not, it’s imperative that w...
... middle of paper ...
...erson in the hospital’s waiting room. If the surgeon takes this person’s organs, he will die but the five in critical care will survive. Taking the healthy person’s organs is _______.” 90% - 97% of people said it was permissible to flip the switch, obligatory to rescue the baby, and forbidden to remove a healthy person’s organs. When they were asked to justify their answers most couldn’t offer explanations.
I’m not stating that morality is insignificant, or that morality doesn’t have a well defined definition. For example, people in similar societies or genetic code can talk about either something is moral or not with little doubt, because they believe in a similar definition. I’m simply stating that morality has different meanings depending on who you ask, and arguments about morality are often stating concepts without an understanding of the word between everyone.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Morals: The belief in a moral obligation to engage in international, like the persuasion theory, is quite broad. Morality can’t be reduced to a matter of right and wrong; states have more complex beliefs than that. In this case, the causal factor for participation is rooted in belief. This differs from coercion in that coercion disregards the intentions of (the weaker) states. The weaker states do what they must not what they desire. The morality theory also differs from the persuasion theory. Under the persuasion theory the state is in control of its actions and acts based on ideas and principles, however, those principles are based on self-interest.... [tags: Law, Morality, Human rights, Ethics]
1089 words (3.1 pages)
- Sigmund Freud believed that society has instilled morality upon us, exterminating our individualism. This morality eventually leads to neurosis, in which it becomes more difficult for us to maintain ourselves through the stress of society’s morality. I disagree with Freud, because I believe that morality isn’t forced on us externally, but internally through reason. As humans developed reason, we also developed a sense of morality through that reason. Freud believes that humans should do what they want because we shouldn’t restrict ourselves on society 's behalf.... [tags: Human, Religion, Morality, Thought]
1499 words (4.3 pages)
- When it comes to morality, there are different theories that can lead to what drives and creates morality. Yet, the question that all theorists try to find the correct answer to is what morality is. The theories that were discussed in chapter 2 gave off the impression that each theory that has ever existed and will exist will be contradicted. Although each theory gave a precise explanation, each theory was based on every theorists own opinion and belief. For every act or motive there is a reason, and any action that would take place would be deemed as unethical.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Virtue, Immanuel Kant]
869 words (2.5 pages)
- Many arguments have been made over whether or not religion and morality are interconnected. It is quite difficult to find a well rounded definition of religion or morality due to everyone having different perceptions of both of the words. The word religion comes from the Latin words Religio or Religare both have similar meanings, a bond/bind (Diener, 1997). Merriam-Webster dictionary defines religion as "a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith (Religion).” Morality comes from the Latin word mores meaning character or manner (Diener, 1997).... [tags: Religion, Morality, Human, Ethics]
1374 words (3.9 pages)
- In today’s society it’s very common to hear people debate about whether someone’s action was “moral” or not. The concept of morality is discussed like there’s a set definition of it, when the reality is far from it. There are so many definitions for morality that it makes the word itself unclear. To have a better understanding of morality it 's best to look at the word’s root word: moral. Having morals is defined as having good character and how that person interacts with others. Having morals is to have morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Religion, Human]
864 words (2.5 pages)
- Chapter 1: Morality is not a science; it is an ever-changing view of what is right and wrong, good from bad throughout the course of human life. Science deals with facts, measures of values, where there are only “personal” opinions. Morality is subjective, where I don’t believe that there is such thing as moral facts. People disagree/ agree over ethical questions all the time, it is subjective matter. In a subjective matter, the speaker conveys feelings, where as in a scientific matter, the speaker would report facts (tested/proven).... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Moral psychology]
2354 words (6.7 pages)
- Question: Is there a role for morality in the law. If so, what is this role. In society a code of morality could be seen as a set of beliefs, values and principles. The root of morality is bad and good behaviour. Moral views differ between individuals also within society. A dictionary definition of morality is ‘a set of personal or social standards for good or bad behaviour and character.’ Furthermore, law could be seen as a set of rules assigned by the government to keep society in order by following these rules.... [tags: Morality, Law, Human rights, Moral]
1660 words (4.7 pages)
- Morality is an abstract concept that continues to confuse people worldwide, a concept that is accompanied by the image of a compass. However, people believe that morality is a generalized system, but then how are morals symbolized by a compass if most compasses are different. The answer is obvious in M. L. Stedman 's The Light Between Oceans where the author communicates that morality is not defined in black and white terms, but is rather a blurred shade of grey. Stedman gives readers this answer through the actions and reactions of Tom and Isabel, Hannah, and Lucy on the decision made to keep Lucy on Janus Rock.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Mother, American films]
1335 words (3.8 pages)
- Machiavelli believed that, ethics and morality were considered in other categories than those generally known. He does not deny the existence of, but did not see how they can be useful in its traditional sense as in politics and in the government of the people. According to Machiavelli, a man is by nature a political angry and fearful. Machiavelli had no high opinion of the people. It is assumed that a person is forced to be good and can get into the number of positive features, such as prudence and courage.... [tags: Political philosophy, Morality, Ethics, Government]
1447 words (4.1 pages)
- What is the morality of a lie. Morality and ethics is a topic widely discussed in philosophy. There is a distinctive difference in the perspectives of ethics held by Kantians and those who hold a utilitarian view of ethics. Kantians believe that the ethical standpoint of a decision be made purely on the decision itself, whereas Utilitarian’s judge the ethics of the situation based on the outcome. Kant believes that “good will has nothing to do with the outcome” (Garner PowerPoint). In the case of comparing these two views a simple example will be used: a lie to save a life.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Immanuel Kant, Logic]
1074 words (3.1 pages)