Philosopher, Christine Korsgaard, assesses her idea of the capacity for normative self government, in her her short writing, Morality and the Distinctiveness of Human Action. In her writing she argues that a form of life, whether human or animal/insect, it is not one controlled by guidelines and principles but is one governed by instinct desire and emotion. Korsgaard makes her claim with examples and premises on intentions. Korsgaard claims that the essence of morality relies on the normative self government and believes that laws in society do not protect those who are citizens but those who share the interest that the laws were made to protect.
Korsgaard 's first argument that I believe is strong is the premise that in society we have the basic rights as a citizen in a well governed country such as the rights of personal liberty, freedom of speech and association because everyone has the right to to determine whether what counts as a worthwhile life to live as long as it is consistent with everyone else 's. An example Korsgaard gives is that if someone cannot interfere with your freedom of speech then they can not interfere with your prayers. Korsgaard argues by saying that morality is just created by us humans and that we set what morality is by rules set forth by our own human kind. We have created rules and circumstances that everyone uses as a guideline of whether they are doing the right thing. A lot of decisions in our everyday are determined by the laws that are set forth by the government. For example, if one were trying to decide whether to steal something or not, the average person would not because they would not only be breaking the law but would feel bad. Hence, showing Korsgaard 's theory working in socie...
... middle of paper ...
...ur actions by your own moral internalism which I understand as normative self government. When using your own evaluations you must provide moral reasons that will end in a good final. Once we perform those actions we evaluate them and determine our own inner moral agents. She provides the Kantian view throughout her writings and concludes the perspective by adding in her perspective that there must be a reason for the actions while performing and evaluating the end goal. Her perspective also ties along with the idea of reciprocity in the sense that we only serve in order to be served back.
In conclusion, morality is determined by our own judgements and determinations of good and bad. We are our own moral agents in a sense that self govern ourselves. Though we have different purposes that non humans, animals still serve and follow their own norms of self government.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Act- Utilitarianism is the rightness of actions depends entirely on how they impact welfare or happiness, by attempting to maximize each. Utilitarianism sees no action is bad in itself because morality is decided by consequences of actions. The ‘good’ of saving the innocent people must be weighed up against the ‘bad’ (torturing the suspect) in order to make a decision on the correct course of action. Bentham calls this method of moral evaluation the ‘principal of utility. Whereas for deontologists, they believe our moral obligations do not entirely depend on the consequences of our actions.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Human rights, Torture]
826 words (2.4 pages)
- We as humans have an inborn sense of moral direction much like animals do. But it is this moral instinct that creates a symbiotic environment. From this one could construct additional rules that simply facilitate the world or are simply observations of the world without such rules being expressed. Or rather we have an inherent desire to live and thrive among one another but ethics as we know it are constructs of society when it was developed. Human morality could have clearly grown out of primate sociality.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Human, Virtue]
1535 words (4.4 pages)
- Morals: The belief in a moral obligation to engage in international, like the persuasion theory, is quite broad. Morality can’t be reduced to a matter of right and wrong; states have more complex beliefs than that. In this case, the causal factor for participation is rooted in belief. This differs from coercion in that coercion disregards the intentions of (the weaker) states. The weaker states do what they must not what they desire. The morality theory also differs from the persuasion theory. Under the persuasion theory the state is in control of its actions and acts based on ideas and principles, however, those principles are based on self-interest.... [tags: Law, Morality, Human rights, Ethics]
1089 words (3.1 pages)
- Sigmund Freud believed that society has instilled morality upon us, exterminating our individualism. This morality eventually leads to neurosis, in which it becomes more difficult for us to maintain ourselves through the stress of society’s morality. I disagree with Freud, because I believe that morality isn’t forced on us externally, but internally through reason. As humans developed reason, we also developed a sense of morality through that reason. Freud believes that humans should do what they want because we shouldn’t restrict ourselves on society 's behalf.... [tags: Human, Religion, Morality, Thought]
1499 words (4.3 pages)
- Human Values: The Key to Solving Global Problems ABSTRACT: At the dawn of global civil society, the test for humanity is to achieve unity while preserving cultural differences as well as the distinctiveness of nations and peoples. Such unity can be reached only by recognizing human values, especially human rights. However, these rights must be strictly determined and more than mere obligations. Hence, the most important task for philosophy is to develop foundations and principles for a world society and to formulate a global consciousness and a humanistic worldview that adequately reflects the realities of our epoch.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive papers]
1564 words (4.5 pages)
- According to consequentialists, like Machiavelli, ends justify means, thus those who ignore everyday reality in order to live up to an ideal of goodness will soon discover they have embarked on a path of self-destruction. In contrast, deontologists like Socrates, believe that “a good man cannot be harmed” (Plato 41d), and that humans should seek to remain intrinsically moral and good. Given that humans are not good and moral by nature, yet seek to remain secure, princes will seek to retain their fame, glory and honor by keeping a state secure and stable.... [tags: Morality, Human, Ethics, Political philosophy]
1247 words (3.6 pages)
- Morality: Discovery and Human Thought Morality defines between right and wrong. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, morality can “refer to some codes of conduct put forward by a society or, some other group, such as religion, or accepted by an individual for her own behavior, or can refer to a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons.” With this definition, who correctly defines morality, the ethical relativist or the ethical objectivist.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Culture, Moral relativism]
737 words (2.1 pages)
- In today’s society it’s very common to hear people debate about whether someone’s action was “moral” or not. The concept of morality is discussed like there’s a set definition of it, when the reality is far from it. There are so many definitions for morality that it makes the word itself unclear. To have a better understanding of morality it 's best to look at the word’s root word: moral. Having morals is defined as having good character and how that person interacts with others. Having morals is to have morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Religion, Human]
864 words (2.5 pages)
- Philosophical musings on the nature of morality are often expressed by thinkers who focus on human nature. Among the factors which determine human behaviour, a moral analysis of the concepts of right and wrong is often prominent. In investigating human behaviour through the relationship between reflection and action, this morality is often observed. Therefore, in the course currently entitled Human Sciences 101: Reflection and Action, both phiolosophy and morality are key themes. However, the calendar description for the course is as follows, “What is the relationship between thinking and action.... [tags: reflection, action, morality]
1413 words (4 pages)
- Morality is not exactly a widely discussed topic in today’s day and age. Morality in its most basic definition is principals concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. What is morally right or wrong is a distinction that plagues the world. Morality isn 't the same from person to person, different cultures, some are universal, and some are just basic human emotion. I believe that morality is almost like a code of conduct or unspoken rules our very soul follows our entire life.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Religion, Moral]
1142 words (3.3 pages)
- The War Of 1812 And Its Effect On American History
- What I Learned At Theological Ethics
- True Friendships : A Relationship Between Two Or More People Who Care And Respect Each Other
- Why The United Kingdom Left The European Union
- Music And Its Influence On Children
- I Am Rapidly Becoming A Regular At Farmer Copley ' S