My purpose in this essay is to explain and discuss the importance of the “moral twin earth” argument. This theory focuses on the argument first proposed by Hare, which states that in order to have a genuine moral disagreement there needs to be a common understanding of the concept in question. This theory holds importance because it openly refutes Cornell realism, which denies that moral terms, like ‘right’, are synonymous to any non-moral terms that may be part of the properties that ‘right’ picks out; the properties that are attached to moral terms, like ‘right’ are responsible for their usage. Thus, the goal is to show how the “moral twin earth” argument undermines the idea that moral terms refer to some natural properties of actions, which in turn regulate our moral practices.
The “moral twin earth” thought experiment says that we are to imagine that all Earth human species uses of the word ‘good’ (‘good-E’) entail the natural property, which makes things ‘good’ according to a normative consequentialist theory, let’s say the theory of maximizing happiness. The Earth human species would adopt any moral theory that allowed maximizing happiness as good-making.
Next, imagine that in a separate galaxy there exists a land, Moral Twin Earth. Moral twin Earth is so close to being identical to Earth; the species of twin Earth speak a language that is linguistically and semantically identical to the one Earth species speak, English. Additionally and most importantly, moral terms like ‘good’, ‘bad’, ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ have the same functional properties that they do on Earth. (Horgan & Timmons 1992) The twins use these moral terms to figure out certain actions. For instance, they try to do things to which they apply ‘good’; and th...
... middle of paper ...
... rise to the Open-Question Argument again. The moral terms ‘good’ on Earth and on twin Earth will be regulated by a certain natural property, but one can always question whether that term is actually good. It is an open question whether maximizing happiness is good or whether is it good to maximize happiness. If property identity does not require synonymy, then it is fair to say that moral terms fail to refer to natural properties. The reference of some terms is not determined by a description or concept with which they are associated.
Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (1992). Troubles on Moral Twin Earth: Moral Queerness
Revived. Synthese, 2, 221-260.
Merli, David., (2002). Return to Moral Twin Earth. Canadian Journal of Philosophy,
Rubin, M. (2013). Biting the Bullet on Moral Twin Earth. The University of Western Australia, Australia.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- All moral arguments for the existence of God work on the principle that we all have a shared sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, broadly speaking, humans worldwide have a vague idea of what is right and what is wrong; a moral argument for the existence of God would say that this mutual understanding is proof of God's existence. Immanuel Kant put forward this argument (although, not a moral argument); God as the source of objective morality. Firstly, he addressed the categorical imperative; our own sense of duty, and that being moral was case of following this principle, for example, paying your debts.... [tags: Religion Argument Analysis]
1604 words (4.6 pages)
- Despite his two claims being about morality in general, Williams focuses his argument on cases of internal justification based on internal moral assessments. He claims that whether an agent views himself as justified may depend largely on luck. However, this justification may never be pertinent to external agents, insofar as external agents have no obligation to listen to personal justifications. Notably, Williams isn’t arguing against a particular philosophy but against a common-sense view that morality is both immune from luck and a supreme value.... [tags: WIlliam, arguments, moral assessments]
959 words (2.7 pages)
- Which is which. In the attempt to explain morality, two prominent theories exist- moral relativism and moral objectivism. Morality in a sense is difficult to explain, both theories attempt to shed a bit of light in way to break down its complexity. Moral Relativism argues in the view that morality exists only due to the fact that it is relative, or in respect to, cultural or individual beliefs. In a sense, it is up to the people to determine what is right and wrong. On the other hand, moral objectivism views that morality is not parallel, or relative, to one 's beliefs.... [tags: Morality, Human, Ethics, Moral relativism]
1394 words (4 pages)
- ... Geoengineering could have some technical Dependence Hazards as well. We could become dependent upon this geoengineering technology and may never do away with it because we will always need to keep on top of things. If we lose funding climate change could be quick and far worse than it might be if we were ever to allow it to progress. ( Hale, 2012, p 124) Geoengineering only treats the signs and does not fix the core of the problems. “you’re papering over the problem so people can keep incliting damage on the climate system without having to give up fossil fuels” ( Hale, 2012, p 125) An example of this band aid solution is placing a band aid on a patient suffering a heart attack.... [tags: countering climate change]
1246 words (3.6 pages)
- It’s Immoral to Ban Human Cloning The Bush administration has declared itself "unequivocally opposed" to human cloning, whether for stem-cell research or reproduction. "The moral and ethical issues posed by human cloning are profound and cannot be ignored in the quest for scientific discovery." The premise here is apparent: until a scientist can satisfy the religiously minded, the scientist cannot proceed. Science functions by permission of religion. On this premise, we would not have anesthesia, birth control, or, arguably, the wheel.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays]
705 words (2 pages)
- A relatively young philosophy and rapidly groving movement is environmentalism. It has roots in ethical philosophy. It presents a moral duty in having an obligation to the planet. However, its approach is misguided: While it is obviously useful to study and to be familiar with the the Earth we inhabit, presenting a moral obligation of protecting it is an incorrect approach. Many have been lead to accept this falsehood, guided by shaky logic and sentimental notions of no moral concern. We have no moral obligation to the Earth.... [tags: ethical philosophy, morality, environmentalism]
903 words (2.6 pages)
- The Ethics of Conjoined Twin Separation Conjoined twins are a rare phenomenon. In the even that a set should appear where one twin is dependant upon the other, I believe that they should be separated, at minimum, to save the life of one. At the same time, I believe that every set of conjoined twins is its own special case. In this study, I will present the background information on conjoined twinning, give a few case studies, and give the pros and cons of conjoined twin separation. I will end with my own views on the subject.... [tags: Moral Science Biology Essays]
2951 words (8.4 pages)
- There are many arguments for moral realism, one of which is presented by David Enoch, who posits a unique explanation of how normative truths can exist. He argues for moral realism by using his Indispensability Argument, which explains the necessity of normative facts in deliberation. I will argue that Enoch’s claim is valid in that it fairs well against opposition, however it shows weakness by not addressing moral subjectivity. To begin, David Enoch defends moral realism using his Indispensability Argument.... [tags: Philosophy]
1969 words (5.6 pages)
- Analysis of the Third Twin by Ken Follet In the book The Third Twin by Ken Follet a number of ethical issues arise throughout all of the thrills and plot twists that occur. The main ethical issue that arises in the novel is that of human cloning. In the book the female protagonist, Jean Ferrami, begins to unravel a series of mysteries where a corporation known as "Genetico" had invitro fertilized eight identical zygotes and inserted them into eight different mothers within a close period of time.... [tags: Follet Third Twin Analysis]
977 words (2.8 pages)
- The Moral Argument for the Existence of God Kant did NOT put forward a moral argument and anyone who said he does is wrong!!!. Kant rejected all attempts to argue from the world to God, he regarded such an exercise as impossible. However he thought that God was a POSTULATE of practical reason. If you share Kant’s assumptions, then it becomes necessary to assume that there is a God. Kant’s reasoning…. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. All human beings desire and seek happiness --------------------------------------------- 2.... [tags: Papers]
2030 words (5.8 pages)