While moral relativism may seem appealing due to the fact that if and individuals behavior feels right to them than it is right for them. When applying this position of morals to everyday situations it revealed to be a fairy tale in search of individualism. Unless everyone lives in a bubble where they have no interaction with anyone else moral relativism is just not pragmatic. Consider if you were mugged, during the altercation, you were beaten, injured and your personal belongings were stolen. After applying moral relativism to this situation, the conclusion is that the person who mugged you did absolutely nothing wrong. The person you feel may have violated you as an individual felt that their actions were right. Why would this person submit you to this behavior? This not a question that a moral relativist would ask because they have no right to influence or question another’s moral values. In addition t...
... middle of paper ...
...ativist cannot say that it is wrong. This particular scenario insinuates that a parent who is a moral relativist would not want to force her personal beliefs on her child and would respect whatever the child feel is right.
As stated above a world where everyone is right, is but a fairytale of inevitable chaos. The appealing yet misleading idea that we can live peacefully in a world full of moral relativist is undoubtedly nothing more than an illusion. When everyone is right in their actions no one will be held accountable for their behavior or anything that is a direct cause of their conduct. A community without wrong can never be right. Therefore moral relativity will never be a realistic moral position that can be applied to communities, nations or worldwide. If this position ever became a moral norm life as we know it would soon be filled with anarchy.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Consequentialism is a moral theory which is founded on the premise that an action is morally right if the outcomes of such actions maximize the good and minimize the bad. In contrast, Non-consequentialism is derived from the premise that some actions are inherently right or wrong. As these theories can derive either identical or varied conclusions in morally ambiguous situations, the conclusions in themselves, while important, can not be considered evidence for the theory’s value. Hence, as we can only judge a theories value by its premise, I will argue that consequentialism is derived from a sound premise, while non-consequentialism is based on an unfounded assertion.... [tags: morality, ethics, consequentialism]
1578 words (4.5 pages)
- The reason as to why I decided to choose this organization is because this is the appropriate Company to look into when it comes to the application of philosophy in various investment firms. It is a type of public –private partnership and in most cases there are always various misconceptions in various investment operations that are undertaken in this case. The issue of fairness is another major issue that has tremendously affected such partnerships when it comes to the allocation of resources and other cases advice.... [tags: Philosophy, Ethics, Normative ethics]
1110 words (3.2 pages)
- A Glimpse into Aristotelian moral theory When it comes to philosophy and philosophers there are many great thinkers that seem to originate in one’s mind. One philosopher that many had heard in some form is the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Aristotle is one the most recognized philosopher, dating all the way back to over 350 B.C. Aristotle has thought up great theories that have affected almost every aspect of human knowledge. His wide range of wisdom has shaped history forever. Aristotle’s ethics has been described teleological, meaning that all things are for the interests of humans.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Aristotle, Happiness]
1033 words (3 pages)
- In ones adolescent years, an important figure or role model taught the values of morality, the importance between right and wrong and the qualities of good versus bad. As the years, decades, and centuries have passed by, the culture of morality and the principles that humankind lives by have shifted and changed over time. In the article, “Folk Moral Relativism”, the authors, Hagop Sarkissian, John Park, David Tien, Jennifer Cole Wright and Joshua Knobe discuss six different studies to support their new hypothesis.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism]
1352 words (3.9 pages)
- Can we assume an action is moral just because it is normal and accepted by the majority of people. According to moral relativism, the answer is yes. Relativism is the belief that says moral principles are valid, but are different by individuals (subjectivism) or by culture (conventionalism). Conventionalists like Ruth Benedict claim that cultures cannot judge one another, since they have different principles (Pojman, 514). On the other hand, Pojman argues that there are some serious issues with relativism.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
964 words (2.8 pages)
- Argument from moral variability, as we discuss in our philosophy class, it is an argument to support Ethical Relativism, this argument claims that since different people have different moral standards, so there is no universal moral standard. As Stace claimed in his essay “ Ethical Relativism: A Critique”, “For the absolutist there is a single universal moral standard. For the relativist there is no such standard. There are only local, ephemeral, and variable standards.”(Stace, para 7). What Stace indicated in his argument is: people form different moral standards based on their backgrounds, circumstances, and ages, one thing treated right for this group may be treated wrong for the other g... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism, Truth]
1035 words (3 pages)
- The debate between moral relativists and moral cognitivists is centered around the question of whether there exists a metric by which actions and intentions can be judged. To avoid any confusion and prevent the opportunity for any strawman attacks, morality will be considered in a broad sense as the distinction between what a person ought to do and ought not do. Also, moral relativism will be defined as holding the belief that moral actions are relative, or subjective, to contextual circumstance and that there exists no metric by which actions and intentions can thereby be globally judged.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism, Culture]
1028 words (2.9 pages)
- According to Pinker (2008), morality is stated to have aspects of universalism. He asserts that we are born with universal morality mechanisms and we adapt to our circumstances and come up with our own set of moral rules based on our instinctive moral schemas and where we come from (Pinker, 2008). In his article he specifically outlines five moral universals which are somehow incorporated into practically every set of moral rules no matter how different. I agree with Pinker’s analyses of morality.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Ethics]
982 words (2.8 pages)
- Moral relativism is the concept that people’s moral judgement can only goes as far a one person’s standpoint in a matter. Also, one person’s view on a particular subject carries no extra weight than another person. What I hope to prove in my thesis statement are inner judgements, moral disagreements, and science are what defend and define moral relativism. Inner judgements are critiques about a person’s particular behaviour and what they should or should not have done. Judgements include labels that outline a person’s behaviour or lifestyle.... [tags: Morality, Human, Moral relativism]
1003 words (2.9 pages)
- Gilbert Harman lays out his moral relativism theory with “inner judgments”, the statements concerned with “ought”, in Moral Relativism Defended. However, he assumes an important premise of his theory to be true, which is the reason that I will prove the missing premise – that moral relativism is true – in this paper. Moreover, his form of moral relativism with his “four-place predicate ‘Ought(A,D,C,M),’ which relates an agent A, a type of action D, considerations C, and motivating attitudes M,” has brought about both meta-ethical and practical concerns.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Ethics]
1800 words (5.1 pages)