Worldwide societies differ in what they believe to be right and wrong. Moral relativism is the idea that moral principles are relative to one culture or society and independent of others, according to this practice there is no universal moral standard. This moral belief is widely rejected and is seen as unfit in today’s worldwide society. One way which moral relativism can be useful in today’s society is when comparing our society to yesterday’s. The underlying idea of time is what most influences our relative beliefs of morality. This supports the thought that moral values are never absolute. As time progresses we are inclined to view the past with scrutiny and adjust moral compasses accordingly.
The basic principle of relativism is at first appealing. The thought of letting each individual and society create their own moral code, independent of the scrutiny of others, seems reasonable. The first criticism of this theory is that across all societies there are several underlying and common moral beliefs. The prohibition of unnecessary killing and respect for ones mother and father. Although the practice of these principles may differ and seemingly disguise the notion, they are prominently present. The second criticism of moral relativism is that it lends too much attention to individual moral beliefs. Even in a small society the individual beliefs of members may differ, but are subjected to the moral beliefs of the majority. With moral relativism individuals are too likely to disobey with the laws or morals of the society they belong too because under this theory no one has the right to be “right” over another. Moral relativism offers no concrete solutions to issues at hand and promotes disagreement and individuality. Alt...
... middle of paper ...
... of moral relativism is as a whole generally rejected, the ethical theory creates a valuable points, and in regards to time the theory does not seem so harmful. Different societies have different moral beliefs. To say one is right over another is hard, but as a global society we have come to a general understanding of what can be tolerated, and justified morally. When viewing different societies it is difficult not to pass judgment on ethical views that are not shared and that is one of the key dilemmas with moral relativism. The societal separator of time allows a culture to progress while viewing the past with scrutiny, because the only influence a society has on time is in the future. By changing the actions of the past, a society can advance relatively to itself. As time changes so do the moral beliefs of a society, so no moral concepts are certainly absolute.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Worldwide societies differ in what they believe to be right and wrong. Moral relativism is the idea that moral principles are relative to one culture or society and independent of others, according to this practice there is no universal moral standard. This moral belief is widely rejected and is seen as unfit in today’s worldwide society. One way which moral relativism can be useful in today’s society is when comparing our society to yesterday’s. The underlying idea of time is what most influences our relative beliefs of morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Religion, Moral]
1018 words (2.9 pages)
- This study will define the diversity of moral values through the theory of Cultural Relativism (CR) that refutes the paradigm that there is a “right” or “wrong” in the moral paradigms of differing cultures. Rachel defines the important moral question of macrocosmic moral paradigms that claim ”righteousness”, yet individual societies have their own moral codes that deviate from these norms. CR defines the importance of diverse moral perspectives throughout the world, which refute any type of absolutist definition of morality.... [tags: Morality, Culture, Sociology, Cultural relativism]
1133 words (3.2 pages)
- 2. Is it wrong to criticise the moral practices of people from other cultures. How would a Cultural Relativist answer that question. How would you answer that question. There are many ethical issues and beliefs that come into debate when the practices of another culture are believed to be immoral, cultural relativism is an attempt at solving these moral disputes by encouraging an attitude of tolerance to all cultural practices. The principle of cultural relativism that holds that the practices of another culture cannot be judged as right or wrong on any independent standard as morality is dependant on one’s own cultural upbringing.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture, Value]
1638 words (4.7 pages)
- The debate between moral relativists and moral cognitivists is centered around the question of whether there exists a metric by which actions and intentions can be judged. To avoid any confusion and prevent the opportunity for any strawman attacks, morality will be considered in a broad sense as the distinction between what a person ought to do and ought not do. Also, moral relativism will be defined as holding the belief that moral actions are relative, or subjective, to contextual circumstance and that there exists no metric by which actions and intentions can thereby be globally judged.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism, Culture]
1028 words (2.9 pages)
- In today’s society many people believe that the practice of slavery is morally wrong. However, some philosophers, such as Gilbert Harman, believe that we cannot judge whether slavery is morally wrong or right by comparing it to our own morals. This form of ethics is called ethical relativism, which is the theory that holds morality is relative to the norms of one’s culture or society. Essentially, an action is deemed right or wrong based on the moral norms of the culture the person performing the action belongs to.... [tags: moral beliefs, ethics, values]
640 words (1.8 pages)
- In ones adolescent years, an important figure or role model taught the values of morality, the importance between right and wrong and the qualities of good versus bad. As the years, decades, and centuries have passed by, the culture of morality and the principles that humankind lives by have shifted and changed over time. In the article, “Folk Moral Relativism”, the authors, Hagop Sarkissian, John Park, David Tien, Jennifer Cole Wright and Joshua Knobe discuss six different studies to support their new hypothesis.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism]
1352 words (3.9 pages)
- Introduction Relativism is quickly dominating the cultural landscape of America, as proponents propagate messages of open-mindedness, social and religious tolerance, situational ethics, and the nonexistence of objective truth. Although relativism receives universal application throughout every facet of the human experience, the philosophy becomes especially significant when addressing moral concerns, such as abortion, dying with dignity, etc. While the concept of relativism appears superficially progressive, promising to eradicate discrimination and innumerable social barriers, the philosophy proves irrational under scrutiny.... [tags: Morality, Truth, Moral relativism]
730 words (2.1 pages)
- Which is which. In the attempt to explain morality, two prominent theories exist- moral relativism and moral objectivism. Morality in a sense is difficult to explain, both theories attempt to shed a bit of light in way to break down its complexity. Moral Relativism argues in the view that morality exists only due to the fact that it is relative, or in respect to, cultural or individual beliefs. In a sense, it is up to the people to determine what is right and wrong. On the other hand, moral objectivism views that morality is not parallel, or relative, to one 's beliefs.... [tags: Morality, Human, Ethics, Moral relativism]
1394 words (4 pages)
- Argument from moral variability, as we discuss in our philosophy class, it is an argument to support Ethical Relativism, this argument claims that since different people have different moral standards, so there is no universal moral standard. As Stace claimed in his essay “ Ethical Relativism: A Critique”, “For the absolutist there is a single universal moral standard. For the relativist there is no such standard. There are only local, ephemeral, and variable standards.”(Stace, para 7). What Stace indicated in his argument is: people form different moral standards based on their backgrounds, circumstances, and ages, one thing treated right for this group may be treated wrong for the other g... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism, Truth]
1035 words (3 pages)
- The world contains a great numbers of different cultures that vary from different countries. Sometimes we found other culture interesting or hard to understand. I believe that moral relativism is a unilateral argument that people who consider this standpoint ignore the fact that there are universal standard and the moral progress happen in the society. Based on culture relativism, there is no definitely right or wrong moral standards which they all depend on different culture or different person.... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
1167 words (3.3 pages)