The standard argument against abortion rests on the claim that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life (Thompson, 1971). Judith Jarvis Thomson shows why this standard argument against abortion is a somewhat inadequate account of the morality of abortion. She argues for the conclusion that abortion is sometimes permissible. She begins the essay by pointing out on whether or not the fetus is a person. If fetuses are persons then abortions must be impermissible, and that if fetuses are not persons then abortions must be permissible.
Thomson, begins by conceding the issue of personhood to her opponent; she assumes, for purposes of argumentation, that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception, even though she personally does not agree with that assumption (Thomson, 1971, p. 48). She attempts to show that even if this concern is made, abortion is morally permissible in many cases. Here are her three main arguments:
1) Every person has a right to life.
2) The fetus is a person.
3) So, the fetus has a right to life.
A fetus is a person and has a right to life, which outweighs a mother’s autonomy over her body, “the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed” (Thomson, 1971, p. 48). Thompson proclaims that abortion is morally permissible in certain cases, such as rape, endangering the life of the mother, or unsuccessful contraception permissible to save mom only if abortion performed by mother herself only and not third party (Thompson, 1971).
Thompson gives several analogies to relate to her argument on the moral permissibility of abortion. Her analogy of a famous violinist, with you as the kidnapped donor, and without your consent...
... middle of paper ...
...at even in instances of rape a woman should not abort because it is the fetus you are punishing instead of the rapist. My response to that is, why should the mother be punished for being physically violated resulting in an unwanted pregnancy? If she chooses to have an abortion, which would be in the first trimester, the fetus cannot survive outside of her body; therefore, should not be considered a separate entity.
Harry. (2010). Thomson’s violinist: what is the point of thought experiments in moral
philosophy? Retrieved from: http://crookedtimber.org/2010/01/23/thomsons-violinist-what-is-the-point-of-thought-experiments-in-moral-philosophy/
Sayball, M. (2016). Thompson video lecture 5 parts.
Thompson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs Vol. 1, No.1 pp. 47-66. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265091
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon.... [tags: Abortion, Human rights, Abortion debate]
1114 words (3.2 pages)
- When considering the question of abortion, I take a utilitarian standpoint. I believe it is important to consider all parties involved, and do so rationally. However, I also strongly feel as if some amount of empathy and emotional intelligence must be involved when considering such a delicate subject. There are a variety of opinions on the subject of aborting pregnancies already, many of them falling into a grey area between 'abortion is always wrong ' and 'abortion is never wrong. ' I believe that Many philosophers who have looked at the issue believe that the most important point to address is where personhood begins; if a fetus is a person, due to the same consideration as any other h... [tags: Abortion, Pregnancy, Fetus, Fertility]
854 words (2.4 pages)
- Abortion is “the act of extracting the unborn human being from the womb”. (Lee and George, 2005, 37-51) Some people consider abortions to be completely immoral while others support abortion and like to ensure the privileges of women rather than an unborn child. Numerous tests can be made to choose for coveted characteristics, for example, deafness in an unborn child. Would it be morally wrong for a listening to couple to choose against deafness or for a hard of hearing couple to choose for deafness.... [tags: Abortion, Pregnancy, Human, Fetus]
1662 words (4.7 pages)
- In A Defense of Abortion (Cahn and Markie), Judith Thomson presents an argument that abortion can be morally permissible even if the fetus is considered to be a person. Her primary reason for presenting an argument of this nature is that the abortion argument at the time had effectively come to a standstill. The typical anti-abortion argument was based on the idea that a fetus is a person and since killing a person is wrong, abortion is wrong. The pro-abortion adopts the opposite view: namely, that a fetus is not a person and is thus not entitled to the rights of people and so killing it couldn’t possibly be wrong.... [tags: Aborrtion]
1883 words (5.4 pages)
- The Violinist Argument In her essay, “A Defense for Abortion,” Judy Jarvis Thomson primarily argues for the permissibility of abortion, due to rape, but it can be challenged by exposing flaws in her argument that relies heavily on analogy. However, objections to Thomson’s explanation fail to defeat her argument. Before Thomson addresses “The Violinist” case, she concedes the point that a fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. Now, Thomson continues by stating that a woman’s right to her body outweighs the fetus’s right to life.... [tags: Pregnancy, Abortion, Human, Meaning of life]
1206 words (3.4 pages)
- instances that before an embryo could survive outside the womb, medical tests could determine a possible serious health related issues and a person should have the opportunity to decide whether to bring that embryo further in term to attempt a life outside the womb. The examples of premature babies being born every day across the country that do not survive demonstrate that viability occurs later than conception. As such, I do not believe that we can say that an embryo from the moment of conception has all the rights of a mother and that we must say abortion is wrong in all situations.... [tags: Morality, Human, Religion, Ethics]
1484 words (4.2 pages)
- For Warren the central question in the debate over abortion is the status of the fetus as a moral person. According to Warren a fetus, while part of the human community in the genetic sense, is not a member of the moral community as it does not meet the personhood criteria, and therefore can be justifiably terminated. It’s important to note the difference between being a biological and moral member of a community. A fetus is biologically human but that doesn’t make it morally human, instead, as Warren presents, a list of criteria must be met to be considered a person and part of the moral community.... [tags: human rights]
828 words (2.4 pages)
- Introduction This essay will examine an often discussed pro-choice analogy. It will consider to what extent the abortion issue is still controversial if the terms of this analogy are accepted as true. This essay will first discuss the premises of the analogy in question. Then it will consider counter-arguments to the analogy. The objective of this paper is to make a determination on whether the controversial nature of the issue of abortion still pertains in light of the acorn analogy. It will be the argument of this paper that this controversy is not subdued by the acorn-fetus comparison.... [tags: legal issues, acorn analogy]
1090 words (3.1 pages)
- “I intend to judge things for myself; to judge wrongly, I think, is more honorable than not to judge at all.” What author Henry James meant by this was that it is better to make up one’s mind and have an opinion than to remain complacent, such as the case of Mary Anne Warren. Warren’s arguments for abortion’s possible permissibility are lacking in substance. The aim of my paper is to discuss Warren’s insufficient criteria for personhood and address the problem with her concept of potential personhood.... [tags: pro-life, personhood, morality]
1103 words (3.2 pages)
- Perspective of Mary Anne Warren on Keeping Abortion Legal Works Cited Missing Mary Anne Warren is one of the top advocates for keeping abortion legal without any restrictions on it. She states that the morality of abortion is dependent on the moral status of the baby, not simply on the rights of the mother. She criticizes those who defend abortion as the right to control one's body: "it is at best a rather feeble argument for the permissibility of abortion. Mere ownership does not give me the right to kill innocent people whom I find on my property…" (The Monist, pg.... [tags: Papers]
1120 words (3.2 pages)