In this work, the authors are trying to determine if everyday people believe in moral objectivism or moral relativism. Suppose an individual agrees with the principles of an objective moral truth meaning that when there are two divergent viewpoints, one stance is ultimately correct, therefore the other stance must be incorrect. On the other hand, moral relativism depends both on moral viewpoints and the opinions that individuals have on those diverse moral claims.
Everyone grew up learning some sort of moral beliefs of what is considered right and wrong. When an individual crosses the finish line first, that...
... middle of paper ...
.... So, if the unrestricted theory revolves completely around social customs, yet, there is uncertainty as to whether the answers of other-culture persons resembles their true culture, we can conclude that the new hypothesis must pertain to the restricted theory; that all perfect moral principals have an equal piece to solve the puzzle of values.
In total, the authors’ new hypothesis was verified and thoroughly supported by each study that was conducted. The shift from moral objectivism, where folks viewed only two definite outcomes of either correct or incorrect, to moral relativism, where both answers could be correct, was undeniable when the authors encouraged an other-culture and extraterrestrial view. Assuming the new hypothesis is true, using reasoning and the statistics in the studies, one can confirm that this supports the restricted theory of moral relativism.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Which is which. In the attempt to explain morality, two prominent theories exist- moral relativism and moral objectivism. Morality in a sense is difficult to explain, both theories attempt to shed a bit of light in way to break down its complexity. Moral Relativism argues in the view that morality exists only due to the fact that it is relative, or in respect to, cultural or individual beliefs. In a sense, it is up to the people to determine what is right and wrong. On the other hand, moral objectivism views that morality is not parallel, or relative, to one 's beliefs.... [tags: Morality, Human, Ethics, Moral relativism]
1394 words (4 pages)
- The world is a mixture of ethical relativism and moral objectivism, even though some commonalities of fundamental moral principles exist between certain societies, not every society subscribes to those moral principles. Ethical relativism is based on the premise that morality is relative to the norms of one 's culture. However, moral objectivism is the position that certain acts are universally right or wrong, independent of human opinion. A hybrid approach to these theological philosophies has helped me be successful in the military.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Virtue, Military]
1326 words (3.8 pages)
- Cultural relativism is the term given to the idea that there are no universal moral values that apply to all mankind and that every culture has its own set of moral principles. This set of principles varies from culture to culture, and it is extremely rare, if not totally impossible, to find a moral principle that is followed by all cultures. For example, the idea of arranged marriages, which is the concept of two families marrying their son and daughter even though they don’t particularly know each other, is fairly common in Indian culture but non-existent in American culture.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
1457 words (4.2 pages)
- We might say that killing another person for absolutely no reason is wrong. But why is it seen that way. Is it because we as individuals or as a society believe it to be wrong. Or is it because there are objective rules of the universe that would be true whether or not we thought it was wrong. Some people believe that morals are not universal and rather that the moral action depends on societal or individual opinions. It is obvious that people and societies have different beliefs on what is right and what is wrong, but does that change what is moral.... [tags: Morality, Religion, Moral relativism, Ethics]
813 words (2.3 pages)
- Cultures and societies around the world often have different moral beliefs. From an anthropological perspective, to deny cultures any validity in their moral beliefs would be a delusional ethnocentric refusal of cultural relativism. From a moral philosophical perspective, however, this is a conflicting matter. Is morality then simply a social construct based purely on arbitrary opinions. Are there no universal moral truths. In response, conventional ethical relativism puts forth the notion that there are indeed no objective moral truths.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
936 words (2.7 pages)
- Can we assume an action is moral just because it is normal and accepted by the majority of people. According to moral relativism, the answer is yes. Relativism is the belief that says moral principles are valid, but are different by individuals (subjectivism) or by culture (conventionalism). Conventionalists like Ruth Benedict claim that cultures cannot judge one another, since they have different principles (Pojman, 514). On the other hand, Pojman argues that there are some serious issues with relativism.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
964 words (2.8 pages)
- The debate between moral relativists and moral cognitivists is centered around the question of whether there exists a metric by which actions and intentions can be judged. To avoid any confusion and prevent the opportunity for any strawman attacks, morality will be considered in a broad sense as the distinction between what a person ought to do and ought not do. Also, moral relativism will be defined as holding the belief that moral actions are relative, or subjective, to contextual circumstance and that there exists no metric by which actions and intentions can thereby be globally judged.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism, Culture]
1028 words (2.9 pages)
- As we discussed chapter 3, I learned about Ethical Relativism, meta-ethics, cultural relativism, objective relativism, and subjective relativism. This topic is very difficult for me to come to an agreement based on someone’s cultural belief and practices. For starters, meta-ethics is a branch of ethics that deals with the meaning of moral principles and/or statements and their “truth” status in the world. Meta-ethics focuses on the religious beliefs and cultural practices and whether is right or wrong or good and bad.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Moral relativism]
1040 words (3 pages)
- In his essay, “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism,” James Rachels argues that cultural relativism is an unsatisfactory moral theory because it is based upon an invalid argument, if cultural relativism were true, this would have some troubling and implausible consequences, and there are some moral rules common to all societies. In this short paper, I will argue that moral objectivism is a more satisfactory moral theory than ethical relativism. Vaughn first defines ethical relativism by stating that moral standards are not objective, but are relative to what individuals or cultures believe (Vaughn 13).... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Culture, Cultural relativism]
1031 words (2.9 pages)
- Many seem to have falling prey to the seduction of ethical relativism, because it plays in to their ethnocentric egoistic moral belief. Individuals such as Pojman are able to critically evaluate this moral principle and not fall victim like his or hers lay counter parts. We will attempt to analyze the theory of ethical relativism, by check the validity of this ethical theory, and evaluate its ethical concepts. With these procedures we will find if it is competent as an ethical principle to adhere by.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism]
1071 words (3.1 pages)