Moral Justification for Torture

623 Words2 Pages

In this scenario there is substantial moral justification for torture. Consider this: law enforcement believes that torturing the target will save thousands of innocents; law enforcement knows of no other way to save those lives; loss of life is imminent; the lives about to be lost are innocent; the target has no good reason to murder the victims; the target is known to be morally responsible for planning and arming the device and if it explodes, that individual will be responsible for the murder of thousands. The target is liable on two aspects. First, the target is causing law enforcement to make a choice between two evils, torturing the target or allowing innocents to die. Were the target to do what people consider the right thing and disclose the location of the bomb, law enforcement would not have to pursue interrogation techniques. Second, the target is engaged in completing his purpose which is to murder thousands of innocents. In this environment laid out, torture is both unlawful and unusual and if law enforcement officials tortured the target they would be tried for a crime...

More about Moral Justification for Torture

Open Document