Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
cons of stem cell research
embryonic stem cell ethics debate sides
cons of stem cell research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: cons of stem cell research
Stem cells offer exciting promise for future therapies, but significant technical hurdles remain that will only be overcome through years of intensive research. Stem Cells have the incredible potential to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth. Scientists primarily work with two kinds of stem cells from animals and humans. The embryonic stem cells and the non-embryonic stem cells. Stem cells are the cells from which all other cells originate. In a human embryo, a large portion of the embryo’s cells are stem cells. These stem cells can be used for cell-based therapies. Cell-Based therapies are treatments in which stem cells are induced to differentiate into the specific cell type required to repair damaged or destroyed cells or tissues. Stem cells are versatile and offer the possibility to treat a number of diseases including Alzheimer’s, stroke, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, etc. The problem is that for the process of embryonic stem cell research and embryo will be destroyed if used. This raises a moral issue and questions of whether stem cell research is unethical or not.
Stem cell research should be allowed on adults but not on humans. Only allowed on humans who are willing to be a part of the stem cell research but no one should be used against their own will. Embryos should not be used for embryonic stem cell research. An embryo being used for their stem cells and then discarded devalues that human life. This follows along the same unethical issue as abortion. When stem cells are removed from human embryos, a unique individual dies. However, if abortion is legal in the state that this research is conducted than research may be conducted on only aborted fetuses. That would be an...
... middle of paper ...
...egal everywhere and this would go against everything that God intended.
Research on animals is a vital process to stem cell research and other research in medicine. Animals can be used by scientist for research as long as it does not harm or kill an animal. Over the years animals have been experimented on for research and have contributed greatly to medicine. However, if animals are continuously killed for trial and error than that suggests animal cruelty.
Stem cell research is not necessarily bad and this research can lead to a positive breakthrough in the medical field. Researchers and consumers have a mutual interest in distinguishing the good research from the bad. However, that is very difficult to do when stem cell biology is a large and widespread field. Stem cell research could find much more support if scientist didn’t conduct unethical research.
...ns of a morally questionable nature. It is necessary that our practices remain ethical and that we uphold the value of a human life, as this is the cornerstone of human society. Embryonic stem cell research is one such operation that forces scientists, policy makers, and the larger society to define what constitutes a human life and to find an answer to the crucial question: Is it morally acceptable to violate the rights of a human life for the for the sake of medical progress?
Benefits of stem cell research can be overwhelming. Today, millions of people around the world suffer from incurable diseases. Stem cell research could help the scientific community find a breakthrough in developing a cure. By observing stem cells develop into mature human tissue, scientists can better understand how embryos develop. “Normal” human development can be recorded. This knowledge can be used to help prevent birth defects, for instance.
The conflict surrounding stem cell research is, with ethical consideration, whether it is a good or bad. The majority of Americans are advocates due to the possibilities of medical advancement, thus saving thousands of lives. Those in opposition believe that it is against
Although some find embryonic stem cells unethical, supporting embryonic stem cell research will benefit humankind in many aspects.
Stem cell research must be performed in order for scientists to develop a method full capable of repairing cells. The benefits of stem cell research greatly outweigh the controversies. In the long term, increased ability to cure diseases would decrease the cost of healthcare globally. In the short term, a lot of money is needed to obtain the knowledge required to save lives. In the long run, stem cell research is worth the money spent. This is only achievable if stem cell stu
Stem cell research can date back to 1956 and has lead to multiple medical breakthroughs. Stem cells are generic animal cells that can make copies of themselves indefinitely. Therefore, these cells have to ability to become any body part or organ (Cowan). But, getting this resource is what brings up a controversy. Scientists and researchers are gathering human embryos to further study and test stem cells and some people don’t agree with this. The end result of using embryonic stem cells is someone being able to walk again, someone remembering the names of their children, and someone being able to say that he beat cancer. Stem cell research is beneficial to society and should be accepted into labs all around the world.
Stem cells are an ongoing research project in which new discoveries are being made about them, and researchers are learning how to use them in new ways. The three current kinds of stem cells all prove to have their own challenges when it comes to using them. The important thing is finding out which stem cell is right for the patient and how much of an ethical concern there is when it comes to using the stem cell. As we learn the best way to use them and they become more popular in the medical field, stem cells will become a new weapon in the fight against certain diseases.
...it also must be closely guarded to make sure it doesn't lead to simply breeding humans just to harvest their organs and making human life immortal. As technology increases and more about stem cells is known more ethical debates will undoubtedly rise. Stem cell research will almost indefinitely continue to attract public attention for many years to come.
...ceptable, who believe it is not acceptable, and who question the personhood, life, and value of an embryo. Although there is no concise decision about the morality of stem cell research, that does not excuse it. Every human being, whether an embryo, a fetus, a newborn, five year old child, or adult, has an undeniable intrinsic value regardless of what individuals like Sandel and Glick say. This value of human life should not be intentionally destroyed by any means, or else it is immoral. Within embryonic stem cell research, a human life is being destroyed and devalued. Although these stem cells are being used to find cures and therapies for diseases and aid the medical world, these ends do not justify the means. Instead of spending time and money on an immoral act research should be done on adult stem cells since human life is not interrupted or destroyed this way.
Over the past years, stem cell research has been very famous through the scientific community and the media. Stem cells are pluripotent cells that are present in every single organism on Earth. The power of stem cells are beyond imagination. Stem cells have the power to turn into any type of cells. Some examples are, blood cells, nerves, cardiac muscles, and the list goes on and on. The scientific community has recently taken a large interest in stem cells. They have used stem cells to treat horrible misfortunes that people have been diagnosed with. Some examples of the diseases that are being treated by the use of stem cells are, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, spinal cord issues, strokes, diabetes, damaged organs, and even cancer! However, despite the infinite potential for medical treatments, the topic of stem cells is surrounded by enormous amounts of controversy. The questions that feed the controversy are about how the stem cells are acquired and about how the gained knowledge would be used. However, it is necessary for mankind to keep stem cell research alive in order to save lives while taking care of any unethical topics about it.
From the discussion above it is very clear that there are different opinions on the pros and cons of stem cell research. Based on the recent researches, scientists have the capability to work out the alternatives for embryonic stem cell research. And the usefulness compare to embryonic stem cell remains unknown. Undeniably, the stem cell research issue has its most complex parts to be resolved and surmounted. But perhaps we can disclose the way to carry out stem cell research with the balance of bioethics and most importantly, do no harm for humankind one day.
One of the most controversial topics in the media today is the question of the morality of research on human embryonic stem cells. According to a Gallup poll taken in May of 2010, 59% of Americans believed medical research using stem cells obtained from humans was morally acceptable, where 32% believed it was morally wrong. (Saad) This will always be a difficult issue for me to take sides on. There are so many arguments for and against and so many ethical theories that support and oppose it. I am going to try to touch on a few of these theories and how they apply to the research done on human embryonic stem cells.
...Individually, I know that embryonic stem cell research is wrong, because that is a living human being that scientists are dissecting-an-embryo, which is just as human as you and I. It may not be able to speak out and voice its opinion, but that doesn’t mean it is okay with being experimented on. It has a right to life, and that right should not be taken away, no matter the circumstances. No living being should be sacrificed. I do approve of adult stem cell research, and encourage it so long as it ends embryonic stem cell research, especially since Doctor Shinya Yamanaka has discovered how to reverse an adult stem cell, making it pluripotent, so it will be identical to that of a 10-day-old embryonic stem cell. It is important now and in the future, that humans will always remember to keep our beliefs, morals, and ethics above all, because that is what keeps us human.
Embryonic stem cell research is, perhaps, one of the most divisive ethical issues of the millennium. These cells are thought by many to hold the cures for such diseases as diabetes, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, heart disease and even cancer. Some researchers believe that these cells could heal spinal cord injuries, allowing a once paralyzed man to walk again. Despite the numerous potential benefits, the issue is exceedingly controversial and has sparked much debate, primarily over one sole reason: embryonic stem cell research causes the destruction of an embryo. This debate can be epitomized into two questions: when does human life begin and what makes an organism human. The answers to these questions are usually opinionated and not backed
Current research to cure disabling diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and spinal cord injuries are at an all-time high. With influential speakers to encourage these movements to end these diseases, many see the value in finding a cure. This brings up the discussion of whether or not embryonic stem cells research should be allowed. The process would be extracting stem cells from a five to seven-day old embryo, and then used to develop tissues that can be used to cure certain diseases. Some view the issue with this process to be that the extraction of stem cells kills the embryo, which goes against the pro-life perspective (14.8.1) That the agree in using embryonic stem cells in research want to save lives as well, just from