When we find ourselves conflicted in a difficult decision-making process, a Kantian would advise us to evaluate the outcomes of our decisions and think whether we would want to have such actions made acceptable universally. If we cannot imagine living in a world where innocent individuals, regardless of their status, meet death to pay for the crime of another, then we ought not to take such actions against an innocent individual. Otherwise, the result would only lead to a world, where the true criminals roam free while many innocent lives are jailed or executed. This effect could al...
... middle of paper ...
...eate a less happy society than would utilitarians. This is because the Kantians would be more likely willing to commit actions of just nature, therefore leading them to be more selective, which in turn decreases their happiness-maximizing existence. To see how this plays out in a real case scenario, the person who would have been in the position to convict an innocent life would refrain from doing so. That decision could potentially give him a bad reputation in his career (for not being able to catch the actual criminal) and in the worse case, a messy riot would arise, and no one is happy. On the other hand, the utilitarian-minded authority would go on to convict the innocent life, earning him a medal for a job well done and overall the public will celebrate a false victory of justice. Ultimately, there are objections to both Kantian and Utilitarian’s perspectives.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- There has been an ongoing debate regarding torture and ethical reasoning to determine when or if its ever ok. Modern scholars such as Alan Dershowitz, Sam Harris, and Charles & Gregory Fried, have expressed different ideas on ethical torture. Ideas of ethical reasoning were established by John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Even though they did not specifically use torture as an example of ethical reasoning for decision making their rational can still be applied to this topic. Immanuel Kant believed our moral decisions are based on categorical imperative.... [tags: Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Morality]
1202 words (3.4 pages)
- Even though at the first glance, the two most influential philosophers in human history - Immanuel Kant and John-Stuart Mill seem to have a lot of disagreements on the central concepts of their moral philosophies – for example, while Kant is concerned more about the intentions of an action, Mill, on the other hand, believes that the consequences of an action are the only justification necessary for an act to be good or moral or right, they still have beliefs in common, such as the concept of the greater good and base their moral systems on a fundamental first principle.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Utilitarianism, Immanuel Kant]
1502 words (4.3 pages)
- Many have different views when it comes to defining morality and the ways in which a person can achieve morality. The three different views that we have discussed in class are the utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill, the non-consequentialism of Immanuel Kant, and the virtue-based ethics of Aristotle. The view on morality that i disagree with most is Mill’s utilitarianism for various reasons. I believe that the other two views have their flaws, but Mill’s view is by far the most flawed, in my opinion.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, John Stuart Mill]
852 words (2.4 pages)
- Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are credited for developing the idea of utilitarianism. Simply put, utilitarianism is doing the most good for the greatest amount of people. In this ethical system, an individuals rights are essentially less important than the good of the majority. Happiness is what is valued in this ethical system. Ultimately, the action that leads to the most good is the right ethical action. Basically, no act is simply right or wrong, but rather it depends on the happiness that comes out doing that act.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill]
711 words (2 pages)
- When you ask your friend what ethics means to them you may get a different answer. You may hear responses that reference religion, laws or whatever feels morally right. The framework for ethics suggest that feelings, religion, law, science, and cultural influences should not be considered when determining if what your about to do is ethical. Here is what you do consider ethical reasoning, • Utilitarian, do the most good or the least amount of harm. • Rights, treat people with dignity and not a means to an ends, if you can’t treat everyone ethically then it should be fair.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Deontological ethics]
1435 words (4.1 pages)
- Immanuel Kant’s “Groundwork to the Metaphysics of Morals” answers the question of, where does the moral value or worth of an action reside by stating the only thing that can be completely good is a good will itself. He voices that even good moral acts and good moral things can have a negative result. Good will is a formal law like how gravity is a law, in order to have a good-willed society, everyone must obey this moral, universal law. The specific requirements of good will are performed by duties, these duties are designed to attain, “this notion that always holds the highest esteem in estimating the value of our actions” (Kant, 116).... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Immanuel Kant, Aesthetics]
1056 words (3 pages)
- Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism are two schools of thought that view morality differently. Both Kant and Mill understand and agree that some form of morality exists. They both recognize that the concept of morality applies to all rational beings and that an action can be deemed as moral or immoral based on reason. Despite being reasonably in agreement about what morality is; there are numerous important differences between Mill and Kant’s perception of morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Utilitarianism]
1759 words (5 pages)
- As I grew older my grandmother used the word “morals” more and more often. She would explain to me that it is important to have morals, to treat yourself and others with respect and to always do what’s “right”. It wasn’t until I was much older that I realized that the idea of what’s “morally” right isn’t always lawful and that everybody 's definition of morals or what 's moral is different. John Stuart Mill 's defines whether an action is morally just or not based off of the amount of happiness obtained from said action.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Immanuel Kant, Human]
1084 words (3.1 pages)
- There are several ways of examining morality philosophically. John Stuart Mill provides some Empirical insight which focuses on consequences. Immanuel Kant views morality in terms of motives. These are the two I will be using to examine my moral dilemma. Before I can examine the implications of each moral view on the case, though, I must first define each view. Mill says you can find one thing that’s intrinsically valuable and all other values fall into place. That value, according to him, is happiness.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Ethics]
1149 words (3.3 pages)
- Immanuel Kant Versus John Stuart Mill Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill; two opposing philosophers of their time. Even though they were living in different countries, their works have been against each other. In his book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant argues that there is nothing better than wanting goodwill by itself. He emphasizes the importance of goodwill over and over again and tries to show how effective moral philosophy can be if goodwill is used as the key element.... [tags: Papers Philosophy Morals Moral Essays ]
1168 words (3.3 pages)