Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pharmaceutical competition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pharmaceutical competition
Over the past few years the price of pharmaceuticals has been increasing at an alarming rate. Drugs such as Daraprim, which treats parasitic infections, have had startling price increases. One even increased as much as fifty times the original price in one night (Sachs, 2). These price increases have led to an increased call for healthcare reform. The microeconomics class I took last semester has helped me to understand some of the proposed reforms such as those suggested in California and Ohio. These states are considering enacting a price ceiling on all pharmaceuticals sold within the state 's boundaries which could lead to a shortage of various prescription drugs. The purpose of this paper is to explain the monopolistic competitive market structure and elasticity because they helped me understand “How to Bring Down Drug Prices Post-Election: Reforms have been proposed at the federal and state level”, by Rachel Sachs.
Ideally the pharmaceutical industry would have a monopolistic competitive market structure. There would be the brand name drug with several generic versions available, all performing the same function biologically while all being slightly different. Entering or exiting the industry would be simple and inexpensive. This would lead to a large number of independent firms, each holding a small market share. Although all of the products would be basically the same there
…show more content…
Elasticity is a measure of the responsiveness to change. The main types of elasticity are price elasticity of demand, cross price elasticity, income elasticity, price elasticity of supply, and elasticity of marginal revenue product, but we will not be discussing price elasticity of supply, and elasticity of marginal revenue product. Price elasticity of demand is the simplest to explain, this is a measure of how much the demand for a product changes based on the change in price. This can be calculated using the
In order to sustain the market share in this highly competitive industry, the pharmacies have to establish and maintain strong working relationships with PBMs that have power to divest particular clients from a pharmacy by denying reimbursement privileges to their customers. Buyer Power Strong It is not hard to obtain the same drugs from different sources, so the customer loyalty is virtually non-existent and the pharmacies have to try extremely hard to sustain their consumer base. Threats of substitutes Weak There are very few alternatives to drugs. Alternatives are practically limited to traditional medicine.
The pharmaceutical industry develops, produces, and markets drugs or pharmaceuticals compounds for medical purpose. Pharmaceutical companies produce generic, brand medications and medical devices. The industry is subject to a complex regulatory environment regarding the patenting, testing and ensuring safety and efficacy and marketing of drugs.
...s: each was licensed to a much larger firm because the originator firm lacked the capability to market the drug. the larger analysis of blockbuster drugs showed that this thread is common across blockbusters that originated with smaller firms. The largest firms appear to hold a significant advantage in commercialization—they are highly effective at extracting the value of innovative drugs . The study suggests some qualified reasons for skepticism that the end of the blockbuster era will bring a major upheaval in the industry. Large firms’ advantage in commercialization suggests that they may maintain their dominant position. Marketing of pharmaceuticals may move from broad-based to targeted approaches, but a company with a broad reach may still have an advantage in identifying markets for niche drugs and commercializing the drugs within those more narrow market
Yu, Winnie and Joel Hay. 1999. “Drug Patents and Prices: Can we Achieve Better Outcomes?” Measuring the Prices of Medical Treatments. Pages 27-28.
In America, it has become a battle to earn a high paying job to cope with the expenses of a typical American. It has become even more of a battle for some people to afford medical prescriptions to keep healthy. Health becomes a crucial issue when discussed among people. No matter what, at one point or another, everyone is going to stand as a victim of the pharmaceutical industry. The bottom line is Americans are paying excessive amounts of money for medical prescriptions. Health-Care spending in the U.S. rose a stunning 9.3% in 2002, which is the greatest increase for the past eleven years. (Steele 46) Many pharmaceutical companies are robbing their clients by charging extreme rates for their products.
Prescription drug prices rose three times faster than inflation in the decade between 1981 and 1991, making the pharmaceutical industry the nation's most profitable business. Prescription drugs even exceeded the rapidly rising inflation rate for all other medical services. They now represent at least 10% of all the medical costs in the United States.1
To some price regulation seems to offer the vision of a free lunch by checking the monopolistic power of health care providers. To others, it offers a convenient way to lower the predicted budgetary cost of entitlement spending. A third motive seems to be a longing to redistribute resources to patients deemed needier.
Due to patents, Pfizer and other companies in the pharmaceutical industry are not always competing in a monopolist’s competition. When a business has a patent they are the only manufacturer who can produce the product until the product expires, so it is clear that the firm can act as a monopoly while in control of the patent. As a monopolistic company, the company has market power, giving it the capability to adjust the market price of a good. The main goal for a monopolist and business owner is to maximize their profits, however, there are rules they have to abide by. The monopolistic companies still have to keep up with the market demand curve. The point at which they decide to produce will rest on their own acidities of revenue, risk and effort. The company also needs to know the price elasticity of the curve: the greater the price elasticity, the more a company such as Pfizer will struggle to establish high prices and a high volume.
In recent years’ health reform has been a driving force in the United States political system. If you watch the news you will undoughtabley hear how citizens, the government, or the economy is or might be effected by some sort of change in medical regulation. One of these hot topic issues is the cost of prescription drugs. Every major drug market besides the United States regulates the price of drugs in some way (Abbott and Vernon). By the United states not doing so many believes it opens consumers up to be exploited by large pharmaceuticals companies. Other believe regulating drug prices limits investment, innovation, and competition in the pharmaceutical industry. In many ways both views are correct yet the later may have more long term lasting
Elasticity of demand is an important variation on concept of Law of Demand. Demand can be classified as perfectly elastic, elastic, inelastic, unitary and perfectly inelastic. An elastic demand is one in which the change in quantity demanded due to a change in price is large. An inelastic demand is one in which the change in quantity demanded due to a change in price is small. An unitary demand is when quantity changes at the same rate as price.
Elasticity is one of the most important theories in economics and it is a measure of responsiveness (Baker, 2006)i. There are mainly two types of elasticity, the elasticity of demand which includes price elasticity of demand, income elasticity of demand, and cross elasticity of demand as well as elasticity of supply (McConnell, Brue, & Flynn, 2009)ii. The degree to which a demand or supply curve reacts to a change in price is the curve's elasticity (Lingham, 2009)iii. Elasticity varies among products because some products may be more essential to the consumer.
Elasticity is the responsiveness of demand or supply to the changes in prices or income. There are various formulas and guidelines to follow when trying to calculate these responses. For instance, when the percentage of change of the quantity demanded is greater then the percentage change in price, the demand is known to be price elastic. On the other hand, if the percentage change in demand is less than then the percentage change in price; Like that of demand, supply works in a similar way. When the percentage change of quantity supplied is greater than the percentage change in price, supply is know to be elastic. When the percentage change of quantity supplied is less then the percentage change in price, then the supply then demand is known to be price inelastic.
Product stops being a star product for the firm and becomes a dog instead due to rise in competition, loss of market share and slow market growth. Companies tend to liquidate their assets in such case to stay alive.
Price Elasticity is the measure in responsiveness of consumers to changes in the price of a product or service. The evaluation and consideration of this measure is a useful tool in firms making decisions about pricing and production, and in governments making decisions about revenue and regulation. “Price Elasticity is impacted by measurable factors that allow managers to understand demand and pricing for their product or service; including the availability of substitutes, the consumer budgets for the product or service, and the time period for demand adjustments.” The proper consideration of Price Elasticity allows managers to set pricing such that the effect on Total Revenue is predictable and adjustments to production are timely. The concept of Price Elasticity is employed in the management of commercial firms and government.
Pharmaceutical patents are patents for inventions within the pharmaceutical industry. Patents give exclusive rights for an invention for a product or a process of making a product [1]. There are many aspects to patents in the pharmaceutical industry that are both pros and cons; it just depends on what industry you are in. Pharmaceutical companies take out patents so they can regulate the market and restrict competition from other companies. By obtaining patents pharmaceutical companies also attract investment. In addition to this pharmaceutical companies can also regulate the price of the drug as they will be the only company selling that drug. However these aspects of patents can adversely affect the generics industry. The generics industry cannot make or sell drugs that are patented but once a patent licence expires, both the generics industry and the WHO see increased benefits as drugs become more widely available around the world (i.e. developing countries) at a lower price. Here we will discuss the pros and cons of patents from the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, generics industry and the WHO.