The police officers arrest Ernest Miranda and took him into custody where police recorded him confessing to his own crime. In court they had Miranda’s confession and he was found guilty of the crimes he committed of kidnapping and rape. Miranda was sentenced to twenty through thirty years in prison. However, Ernesto Miranda addressed to the Arizona Supreme Court about how the police officers illegally obtained his confession. The Arizona Supreme Court opposed that law enforcement illegally obtained Ernesto Miranda’s confession. Miranda then addressed the US Supreme Court, which the court ruled in a 5-4 split decision made by Chief Justice Earl Warren. (PBS 2015)
Miranda’s confession is evidence in a trail in a criminal court because police didn’t read Ernesto Miranda his rights at the time of the arrest. By police not reading Ernest Miranda his arrest at the time of the arrest made it unlawful because Miranda wasn’t informed his right to an attorney before he confessed to the crimes. The situation was unconstitutional to because Mi...
... middle of paper ...
...you must still read them their Miranda rights before and arrest. Everybody also if guilty or not must be read the rights and have proper representation in the court of law. It’s very interesting how something so small can really grow rapidly to something bigger. It’s actually a difficult situation to ever be in for anybody in law enforcement because a criminal not to incriminate themselves. After the Miranda rights are read and arrest has been made, a person can incriminate himself or herself even if they aren’t properly represented because their choosing to speak up on their own self will. As a law enforcement officer we must make sure a person’s rights are met while making a critical arrest. IN the long run Ernesto Miranda was just another criminal looking for a way out of the crimes he committed, but all he really did was make our criminal justice system stronger.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Miranda v. Arizona case not just for the case itself, but also for the significance of the case it had after the case. The Miranda is a nationwide that has changed law enforcement and has changed the rights of an individual. The Miranda rights law took affect after a man named Ernesto Miranda was under arrest by police officers. As police arrested Ernesto Miranda they didn’t read him his rights. Ernest Miranda lived in Phoenix, Arizona where he was charged with rape, kidnapping and robbery. Ernesto Miranda was a criminal, however he was not informed of his legal rights before the arrest.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
1709 words (4.9 pages)
- If a seventh grade boy is interrogated by a police officer, he has the pressure to tell the truth; however if an adult was to be interrogated they would know that they have the right to remain silent. This correlates with the Miranda v. Arizona case, stating that you have the right to remain silent, and after you are told these rights anything you say can be used against you in the court of law. And because children are psychologically and socially different from adults this raises the question- if the age of a child subjected to police questioning is also relevant when determining police custody for Miranda purposes.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
1135 words (3.2 pages)
- Everyone agrees that police should not use unconstitutional methods to coerce a suspect into giving out a confession, yet police have used unauthorized force throughout American history. Fortunately, the Supreme Court created a legal safeguard against police abuses. The safeguards were created in the 1960s after taking a case titled Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda v. Arizona is unarguably one of the most important actions the Supreme Court has taken to prevent police abuses. Many jurisdictions have interpreted Miranda v.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
1116 words (3.2 pages)
- The landmark case, Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most important legal cases in the United States. The decision of the case led to the creation of the Miranda Rights, which is still practiced to this day. Miranda Rights- “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?” (Decision Date: June.13.1966).... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
735 words (2.1 pages)
- Miranda v. Arizona is a case that revolutionized the rights of an accused while in custody and interrogation. The Supreme court leaders based the rights of Mr. Miranda by the fifth amendment of the United States Constitution. The fifth amendment has been interpreted though the decision of supreme court rulings into the right to remain silent in an interrogation in order to prevent the accused to testify against himself. This amendment also protects any person from double jeopardy from the same crime, gives him or her a grand jury, and it requires for due process of law to come in effect in case a citizen is denied him or her from their right of life, liberty, or property.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
1071 words (3.1 pages)
- MIRANDA 2 The case of Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 ) is one of the most important cases in history. It brought about prominent rights that are still existent today in 2015 regarding interrogations and custody. The results of this case are still seen in the current criminal justice system. However, even though the rights that were given to the system by the court, there are still instances today in which these Miranda rights are violated. The concept of Miranda has evolved a lot from a court case to a code used by law enforcement during custodies and investigations.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona, Police]
1271 words (3.6 pages)
- In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the U.S. Courts describes the events as: “Ernesto Miranda, a native of Mexico, living in Phoenix, Arizona, was selected in a police grouping by a woman who implicated him of kidnapping and raping her.” In more detail, Robert Kenneth describes the events as: “Barbara Johnson, an 18 year old, was kidnapped and raped. Johnson was shoved into a man 's car, where he tied her hands and ankles and drove her to the edge of the city, where he raped her. The man drove Johnson near her home, asked her to pray for him and he let her out of the car.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
1104 words (3.2 pages)
- The Supreme Court case Miranda V. Arizona examined the Fifth Amendment presences inside the criminal justice system. The Fifth Amendment addresses the "rights of persons," mainly in the context of the criminal justice system also prohibits being tried twice for the same crime, requires due process of the law his also includes the right to not have land taken away by the government which also legally known as eminent domain without due process. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona, Police, Law]
1255 words (3.6 pages)
- Ernesto Miranda grew up not finishing high school. He didn’t finish the 9th grade, and he decided to drop out of school during that year. He also had a criminal record and had pronounced sexual fantasies after dropping out of high school. Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix in 1963. He had raped an 18 yr. girl who was mildly mentally handicapped in March of 1963. He was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. When he was found and arrested, and he was not told of his rights before interrogation.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
1501 words (4.3 pages)
- Miranda rights are the entitlements every suspect has. An officer of the law is required to make these rights apparent to the suspect. These are the rights that you hear on every criminal investigation and policing show in the country, “You have the right to remain silent, anything you say may be used against you, you have the right to consult an attorney, if you can no t afford an attorney one will be appointed for you.” After the suspect agrees that he or she understands his/her rights, the arrest and subsequent questioning and investigation may continue.... [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]
716 words (2 pages)
- My First Memory Of Becoming A Primary School Teacher
- Women And Women : The Growth Of Man Is Twofold By Margaret Fuller
- The Political Campaigns And The Electorate
- I Attended A Concert Performed By Mission College Symphony Orchestra
- How Can Europe Go This Current Economic Cost Into Future Economic Gain?
- Obesity : A Growing Public Health Problem