The introduction of the book is crucial to understanding Mill’s arguments and the status of his beliefs. It states the basic structure of his argument and his own key deductions. Mill steps back and defines his idea of civilization. He sees it as a struggle with individual people and what creates and defines our society. Which of the two deserves or should have the right to control someone’s actions? This made Mill’s standing on society much clearer and his beliefs on who should really have the power is identified through it. He says that, currently, we are leaning too much towards society being our chosen leader. Mill obviously believes we should be striving to have our foundation built on individuality instead.
His reasons for believing that both communal opinions and laws currently have much more power over the actions and thoughts of an individual than an individual has over himself are much more reasonable now. He mentions that the only time the government or society should be given power to act against someone is if it would cause harm to someone else. Curiously enough, he does not believe that causing harm to yourself is an acceptable reason for society to get involved. However it makes no difference if an individual does it purposely or accidental, if it would cause harm to another person the gov...
... middle of paper ...
...at an individual who believes in prejudice could bring up that he believes that benefits of liberty and free opinion would allow a consequence that is outwardly evil? I would like to know how Mill would fight this argument against freedom of opinion especially because in the act of challenging it he believes his ideas have the opportunity to grow by questioning.
Now look at the questions at the beginning about the sorority girls parading down the sidewalk. They are causing self harm by freezing their bones however are they causing harm to anyone else? Well, that would depend on your definition of harm, something Mill never fully addresses creating the big point to argue when answering the question of when authority should step in. This debate has caused the two opposing sides in politics in democracy that we know today, Democrats and Republicans.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Introduction The aim of this essay is to critically examine the limits of freedom of expression. The limits or constraints of free expression, in most cases, refer to the abuse of free speech, which may cause harm or offence. The essay focuses on defining what types of expression, or more specifically, speech is regarded as the limits of freedom of expression. The essay is divided into two major parts, the evaluative and the extensive part. The first section explores different views on setting standards for modeling restrictions to freedom of expression or to prevent the abuse of free expression.... [tags: abuse of free speech]
2691 words (7.7 pages)
- “Absolute liberty is the absence of restraint; responsibility is restraint; therefore, the ideally free individual is responsible to himself” - Henry Brooks Adams. There has been great debate, past and present with regards to what constitutes as an individuals liberty. It has been subject to constant ridicule and examination due to violations of civil rights. Freedom, liberty, and independence are all important human rights represented within John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty. In his essay, Mill explores the two dimensions to liberty; individual and social.... [tags: John Stuart Mill, liberty, On Liberty, ]
2145 words (6.1 pages)
- What are the limits of freedom of expression in English law. Are they satisfactory. Article 10 of the European convention of human rights holds “Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises” This is enshrined in UK law through the Human rights act 1998.... [tags: article 10 of European convention of human rights]
969 words (2.8 pages)
- John Stuart Mill on Individual Liberty Definition of Individual liberty In his work On Liberty, Mill placed much emphasis on individual liberty and its vital role in political society. To Mill, this phrase may be defined as the liberty of the individual to be the final judge over his actions; to decide what is right and wrong and to act upon that standard. On a secondary level, it also implies one's freedom to pursue one's own individuality. Mill believed in a society in which each individual leads his own distinctive life according to his own unique talents; unfettered by regulations upon thought, opinion, actions etc.... [tags: Politics Mill Liberty Philosophy]
2361 words (6.7 pages)
- ... (Free Market: 2014) This reflects on the Classical Liberal’s objective of a ‘laissez-faire’ economic infrastructure which views freedom as ‘negative’ and requires the government’s input on personal spending to be kept limited. (Hagopian: 1985: 170) John Locke also added that the only purpose of the government is to protect the rights of the individual and private property, therefore the government should only interfere with the free market if there is a violation of human liberty. (Hagopian: 1985: 171) John Marangos said that the market is ‘the expression of economic freedom.’ (John Marangos: 1 June 1999) He argued that it is an ‘institutional process’ that allows people to interact with... [tags: supply and demand, individual freedom]
625 words (1.8 pages)
- The principle of non-harm was brought forth by James Stuart Mill in On Liberty by introducing two different spheres that make up life. The spheres were private and public. A meaningful life is found when a maximum private sphere is present because decisions are personally beneficial. Democratic historical and social context give background to why the non-harm principle was so revolutionary. The non-harm principle can be applied to freedom of speech in that harm by words only occurs when the result is instant physical harm.... [tags: James Stuart Mill, On Liberty]
2738 words (7.8 pages)
- Liberation movements such as the 1960’s Civil Rights movement or the independence of India from England are great references in the method to attain freedom, and to see what freedom means to different types of people. To further understand movements as previously mentioned or other liberation events, a philosophical understanding of freedom is essential. As a rubric if you will, Epictetus and John Stuart Mill both have contributed significantly to the understanding of freedom. Both philosophers lived in very different times, thus providing different interpretation of freedom.... [tags: liberation movements, philosophical analysis]
1408 words (4 pages)
- A Review of the development of Internet and Cyberlaw in United States The history of Internet can be traced back to the Arpanet 1968, a military research network sponsored by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). The ultimate purpose for the invention of the internet was to ensure the military communication during wartime. It was later developed to the private sectors and university researches in the 20th Century. This was the period of time when university students began to use Internet.... [tags: freedom of expression, violence information]
860 words (2.5 pages)
- In Chapter 2, Mill turns to the issue of whether people, either through their government or on their own, should be allowed to coerce or limit anyone else's expression of opinion. Mill emphatically says that such actions are illegitimate. Even if only one person held a particular opinion, mankind would not be justified in silencing him. Silencing these opinions, Mill says, is wrong because it robs "the human race, posterity as well as the existing generation." In particular, it robs those who disagree with these silenced opinions.... [tags: essays research papers]
1926 words (5.5 pages)
- Struggle of Freedom and Power Throughout history, it has been widely acknowledged that there has been a struggle between freedom and power and undeniably, this debate continues well into the 21st century. John Stuart Mill's essay On Liberty raises the point of whether in fact laws help to enforce liberty or whether in fact they act contrary to that objective by destroying it. Mill emphasises that the only purpose for power being rightfully exercised over any member of society, against his or her will, is to prevent harm to others.... [tags: Papers]
1101 words (3.1 pages)