Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Globalization and its impact on the world economy and international relations
Impact of globalization on international relations
Globalization implications on international relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
Unlike the during the Cold War years, today the United States is not faced with any single major threat to our national security (Korb, 2003, p. 1). The demise of the Soviet empire effectively eradicated the threat from a competing superpower, and a new global world order was ushered in with America at the apex. However, American superiority alone can not serve to isolate and protect her citizens, because the safety and prosperity of American citizens “are more bound than ever to events beyond our border” (Obama, 2010, p. 7). The advances and advantages that have come with globalization have also ushered in new threats. Addressing these threats produced in such an interdependent environment requires a holistic approach and synergistic response. This challenge will require “all the instruments of national power, including diplomatic, information, military, economic, and a range of other tools” (Jordan, 2009, p. 233). We must work to strengthen our alliances and collective networks through which we may guide struggling states into peaceful societies and contain and deter those whom wish to wage war. The world we seek is one of a cooperative world order; one in which American leadership spearheads preventive diplomatic and collaborative efforts to create an environment in which the United States and other free societies will not simply exist, but flourish.
A New Security Strategy: A Cooperative World Order
Confronting the Challenges of Asymmetrical Warfare
In these post-Cold War years, the United States has emerged as the world’s sole remaining superpower with unmatched conventional military capabilities (Snow, 2014, p. 286). As a result, conventional warfare has become obsolete, and adversaries have turne...
... middle of paper ...
...d Kingdom.
Jordan, Amos; Meese, Michael; Nielson, Suzanne; Taylor, William; Schlesinger, James. (2009). American National Security. Sixth Edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, MD.
Korb, Lawrence J. (2003). “A New National Security Strategy in an Age of Terrorists, Tyrants, and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Three Options Presented as Presidential Speeches.” Council on Foreign Relations.
Obama, Barak. (2010, May). National Security Strategy. The White House. Washington, DC.
Rollins, John; Wyler, Liana Sun. (2013, June 11). Terrorism and Transnational Crime: Foreign Policy Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service. R41004. Retrieved from: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/R41004.pdf
Snow, Donald. (2014). National Security for a New Era. Fifth Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Barnet, Richard J. “The Ideology of the National Security State”. The Massachusetts Review, Vol. 26, No. 4. 1985, pp. 483-500
Introduction Today, electronic surveillance remains one of the most effective tools the United States has to protect against foreign powers and groups seeking to inflict harm on the nation, but it does not go without a few negative aspects, either. Electronic surveillance of foreign intelligence has likely saved the lives of many innocent people through prevention of potential acts of aggression towards the United States. There are many pros to the actions authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) pertaining to electronic surveillance, but there are also cons. Looking at both the pros and cons of electronic surveillance is important in understanding the overall effectiveness of FISA. 1.
Host: On September the 11th 2001, the notorious terror organisation known as Al-Qaeda struck at the very heart of the United States. The death count was approximately 3,000; a nation was left in panic. To this day, counterterrorism experts and historians alike regard the event surrounding 9/11 as a turning point in US foreign relations. Outraged and fearful of radical terrorism from the middle-east, President Bush declared that in 2001 that it was a matter of freedoms; that “our very freedom has come under attack”. In his eyes, America was simply targeted because of its democratic and western values (CNN News, 2001). In the 14 years following this pivotal declaration, an aggressive, pre-emptive approach to terrorism replaced the traditional
Retrieved from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/268/540 White, J. R. (2014). Terrorism and homeland security (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
The Executive Order Establishing Office of Homeland Security Council puts forth an agenda on countering terrorist acts; it is done to prevent untold a...
Bellavita, C. (2009). Changing homeland security: The year in review - 2008. Homeland Security Affairs, 5(1) Retrieved from http://ezproxy.fau.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1266212855?accountid=10902
Evaluating threats to America’s national security is a challenge that is undertaken by academics, intelligence analysts, policy-makers, and anyone else with the patience. During the Cold War, America’s biggest concern was easy to define, the only other state capable of competing with America, the Soviet Union. Today, America faces threats from states, non-state actors, domestic groups, and even economic conditions. However, two states should always be kept in mind when discussing national security, China and Russia, with China being the biggest threat.
Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security. Cambridge: President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. 71-81. Print.
Roberts, M. R. (2011, September 08). "A broad terrorism plan". American City & County, Retrieved from http://elibrary.bigchalk.com.
By the end of the Cold War the literature focusing on strategic studies has highlighted transformational changes within international system that affected and altered the very nature of war. As a result many security studies scholars have renounced traditional theories of strategic thought. Clausewitzian theory, in particular, has taken a lot of criticism, regarding its relevance to modern warfare. (Gray, How Has War Changed Since the End of the Cold War?, 2005)
26 Oct. 1962. GWU.edu. -. National Security Archives, 2002. Web. The Web.
Citizens feeling protected in their own nation is a crucial factor for the development and advancement of that nation. The United States’ government has been able to provide this service for a small tax and for the most part it is money well spent. Due to events leading up to the terrifying attacks on September 11, 2001 and following these attacks, the Unites States’ government has begun enacting certain laws and regulations that ensure the safety of its citizens. From the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 to the most recent National Security Agency scandal, the government has attempted and for the most part succeeded in keeping domestic safety under control. Making sure that the balance between obtaining enough intelligence to protect the safety of the nation and the preservation of basic human rights is not extremely skewed, Congress has set forth requisites in FISA which aim to balance the conflicting goals of privacy and security; but the timeline preceding this act has been anything but honorable for the United States government.
BENAC, N. (2011). National security: Ten years after september 11 attacks, u.s. is safe but not
Whenever world politics is mentioned, the state that appears to be at the apex of affairs is the United States of America, although some will argue that it isn’t. It is paramount we know that the international system is shaped by certain defining events that has lead to some significant changes, particularly those connected with different chapters of violence. Certainly, the world wars of the twentieth century and the more recent war on terror must be included as defining moments. The warning of brute force on a potentially large scale also highlights the vigorousness of the cold war period, which dominated world politics within an interval of four decades. The practice of international relations (IR) was introduced out of a need to discuss the causes of war and the different conditions for calm in the wake of the first world war, and it is relevant we know that this has remained a crucial focus ever since. However, violence is not the only factor capable of causing interruption in the international system. Economic elements also have a remarkable impact. The great depression that happened in the 1920s, and the global financial crises of the contemporary period can be used as examples. Another concurrent problem concerns the environment, with the human climate being one among different number of important concerns for the continuing future of humankind and the planet in general.
Galdorisi, G. (2013, March 21). Global trends 2030: The role of the United States. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from Defense media network.com: http://www.defensemedianetwork.com