Medical Ethics: Patient Wishes vs Doctor Actions

Medical Ethics: Patient Wishes vs Doctor Actions

Length: 1276 words (3.6 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
A conflict between a doctor who wants to treat his patient a certain way, and a patient who wants to be treated by the doctor the way she wants. The doctor feels the that certain treatment that the patient wants is dangerous and warns the patient that he will pronounce the patient mentally unstable. This is exactly what happened in the case of Mrs. Jackson and Dr. Lowell. The conflict in this entire article is if weather the doctor can, or can not, accuse his patient mental instability to go about the treatment as he sees fit. Is this an invasion of the patient’s wants and desire for a certain way of treatment? or does the doctor have moral rights to do anything and everything even though it is against the patient’s wishes. What justifies as moral and immoral procedure for a doctor to treat his patient.

When faced with this hard dilemma, the article suggests that is use Rule Utilitarianism and Kantian Deontology, to help me solve the problem of weather this justifiable or morally incorrect. Rule Utilitarianism basically reads that “a person ought to act in accordance with the the rule that, if generally followed, would produce the greatest balance of good over evil.”(Mappes & Degrazia, 13) According to this, if anyone faces a moral dilemma, they should always try to sort of do a Cost/Benefits analysis on the outcomes of their actions versus the good that they would cause. So even today when I was debating if or not I should personally write my research essay, or, pay somebody else to write my essay for me, it took me all of 30 second to decides that even though I might not like what i would be doing for the next three to four hours, part of me know that the happiness i would get from it was unparalleled to anything. However, now, if you look at the Kantian Deontology, you will find a lot of things that are different. What this theory of morality says is the outcomes are not at all important, but your duty hold precedence over anything. Similar to Rule Utilitarianism, this theory of morality says that any act, as long as it complies with a rule, is morally justified.

When we think about this problem in a rule utilitarian way, we have to abide by the rules which clearly state that the patient has the final say in what treatment is going to be used on them.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Medical Ethics: Patient Wishes vs Doctor Actions." 123HelpMe.com. 23 May 2019
    <https://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=268843>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Who Is A Doctor? Essay

- Reading this scenario brings several questions to mind regarding the way her father was treated prior to admission to the hospital. Who was his doctor before that diagnosed him with this terminal illness. What escalated him to become so disoriented to where he looks as though he is suffering from malnutrition and how did he become so bruised. According to the signs of liver cancer patients will experience feeling fatigue, liver enlargement, vomiting, itching abnormal bruising and bleeding. Being a naturopathic physician her skill set is mostly holistic and she wishes to treat him that way which is causing his symptoms to escalate more rapidly....   [tags: Physician, Medicine, Patient, Hippocrates]

Research Papers
1191 words (3.4 pages)

Is Doctor Assisted Suicide? Essay

- In November 2014, Brittany Maynard, a 29 year old with terminal brain cancer, became this generation’s face of the Right to Die Movement when she chose to end her life in what is most commonly known as doctor assisted suicide (Hircshorn, 2014). According to the Medical Dictionary, the right to die is defined as “advocating or expressing, as in a living will, a person 's right to refuse extraordinary life-sustaining measures intended to prolong life artificially when the person is deemed by his or her physicians to be terminally or incurably ill.” In both my personal and professional life, I have witnessed many people, family members included, who were diagnosed with terminal illnesses....   [tags: Patient, Physician, Death, Medicine]

Research Papers
1521 words (4.3 pages)

Essay about Medical Issues Of Medical Care

- In this present day and age, medical care is taken for granted and is losing its integrity as the boundaries between Doctor and Patient is becoming dimmer. With the rapid advancement in the science and medical field, there came hundreds of new machines and procedures that are being incorporated into new forms of efficient and safe treatments; however, with these new advancements, the patients would then need to be informed of the risks and benefits of the procedure before they are to undergo any type of treatment....   [tags: Medicine, Physician, Patient, Hospital]

Research Papers
1500 words (4.3 pages)

Essay on Should A Ventilator Be Removed At A Patient 's Request?

- 1. identify the case being discussed a. Should a Ventilator be Removed at a Patient 's Request. 2. which ethical principles/ concepts are relevant to the case (list at least two. Briefly explain each and explain how the principle/ concept is relevant to the case) a. autonomy : autonomy is the right for the patient to actively participate in the medical decisions of their self without it being dictated or controlled by others. This patient although severely ill is deemed competent by the physician....   [tags: Patient, Physician, Palliative care]

Research Papers
1145 words (3.3 pages)

Nurses 's Responsibility For Patient 's Health And Wellbeing Essay

- Nurses have a great responsibility for patient’s health and wellbeing. Patients are the centre of professional nursing practice, therefore, is it important that nurses understand the legal, ethical and professional issues they will face in their career. Regulatory guidelines are what underpin the nurse’s decision making and safeguard both patient and the nurse. This assignment aims to discuss the principles and theories that assist a nurse’s moral judgement when faced with moral issues and to explore the legal and professional laws and guidelines that underpin them....   [tags: Ethics, Morality, Patient, Utilitarianism]

Research Papers
1653 words (4.7 pages)

Telling the Truth to Patients about their Medical Situatin Essay

- Does the doctor must tell the truth directly to the patient regardless of the families' wishes. Or maybe the doctor should tell the truth first to the patient and just after that to the family. Ruiping Fan and Benfu Li’s article tries to arguing if the doctor should or should not tell the truth to the patient. In my opinion, patients have the right to know their state of health. To tell the truth despite families wishes, and to tell the truth to patient before telling to family depends on many things, such as the patient's age , disease , religious beliefs, and etc....   [tags: Sate of health, medicine, medical privacy]

Research Papers
1009 words (2.9 pages)

Patrick Dismuke : A Teenage Boy Who Had Been A Patient Essay

- Patrick Dismuke: Patrick Dismuke was a teenage boy who had been a patient at Hermann Hospital all his life. He suffered from numerous health defects, including blood-clotting problems, malnutrition, and infection. On his journey, he learned to love the hospital, even more so than his home (perhaps due to the slight abandonment by his mother). He loved his doctors and nurses (most of them) and frequently spent his childhood playing games around the nurses’ station. The hospital staff equally loved Patrick, letting him watch movies late at night, allowing him to eat junk food, and answering his late night calls when he was lonely....   [tags: Physician, Medicine, Patient, Emotion]

Research Papers
1388 words (4 pages)

Essay about Euthanasia Is The Act Of Killing A Patient

- An Elderly woman who is bed-ridded asks that you come over in her aid of need. The minute you reach her bedside she looks at you with innocent eyes and asks if you could cut off her life support and die. She tells you that she is currently suffering from unbearable pain that cannot be treat with medical aid. She begs you to let her end her own life in a quick and dignified manner. Would you agree to her wishes. Or go against her will and refuse. Euthanasia is the act offending the life of a person by lethal injection or by medicating drug to the patient....   [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Suicide, Medical ethics]

Research Papers
1378 words (3.9 pages)

Medical Pathologist Who Use Physician Assisted Suicide Essay

- Pamela Bone, a well-known journalist who suffered from multiple myeloma, a terminal cancer of the plasma cells in the blood, once said, “I’m not afraid of being dead. I’m afraid of what you might have to go through to get there.”(Fairfax, 2015). Jack Kevorkian, a well-known medical pathologist who used physician-assisted suicide to help dozens of people, said, “Dying is not a crime.”(ABC News, 2015). There are not very many options for people with severe or terminal illnesses. A terminal illness is a disease that cannot be cured or adequately treated, generally resulting in death over a short period of time....   [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Suicide, Medical ethics]

Research Papers
1383 words (4 pages)

The Ethics Of Medical Ethics Essay

- Introduction Autonomy is represented by a person’s right to maintain control over their life and choices. This topic is important to ethical discussions because the patient is at the core of medical ethics (American Medical Association, 2001) and autonomy is so closely related to patient care. However, as with just about anything there is some conflict on this topic. Some consider autonomy to be of the utmost importance as it relates to respect for the patient, while some people think that autonomy must sometimes be restricted to protect patients from being abused or taken advantage of (Alzheimer Europe, 2009)....   [tags: Medicine, Health care, Death, Patient]

Research Papers
1860 words (5.3 pages)

However, is this really the right decision? This solution to the is problem is basically nullifying the expertise of a doctor in so many ways that his presence might aswell be taken over by a computer. Its not likely that the doctor is going to try to harm the patient in any way. If anyone sits down and thinks about this and you will realize that the face the the doctor has had particular training in this particular field and has an abundance of knowledge in regards to what to offer his patient when certain symptoms exist. Also, please examine the possibility of the patient lack of knowledge in this particular field will make then decide something the is actually wrong for their condition. Generally speaking, most patients do heed to their doctor’s suggestion, but in some cases there are people that feel like they are a better judge of their body then the doctor often end up on the death bed.

Lets think about this in the Kant way, the doctor ordered blood tests for the patient and the patient has to agree to get these test done, however the doctor orders a few other tests that are integral to the patient’s health and does not inform the patient about this. The results come back and they are what the doctor suspected. Cancer. If the doc had not done this, would the patient have ever found out that she had cancer? The answer to that question is a NO. So, even the doctor was not wrong. Because the fact that because of the doctor, the patient was able to find out the fact the she had cancer. Now think about this situation. Should Mrs. Jackson disregard the doctor's suggestion of using chemotherapy instead of the high protein diet with lots of water. The doctor was able to suggest this is Jackson the fact that she had cancer he is also able to suggest to Jackson the type of treatment that would best work for her.

Most of the times this problem is not even valid due to the fact that most patients with cancer usually tend to abide by the will of their doctor however, in recent times, patients neglect think that the doctor has complete knowledge of the situation and the fact that he does have a degree and has had an education. Granted that there are a few doctors that mess up this trust that patients have in them, those types of doctors are maybe one in a million. And most of the doctors that stoop down to such cheap levels to harm their patients are mostly in third world countries, with a blind love of money, however Dr. Lowell is nowhere close to that.

There's a certain policy called informed consent Which basically states that a doctor has to inform his or her patient about the sort of treatment that they are going to be giving their patient and the patient voluntarily has to accept the form of treatment. In Mrs. Jackson's case, Dr. LOL when he first diagnosed Mr. Jackson with cancer had recommended that should go through a dosage of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, Mrs. Jackson's thought that The stage of cancer which she was at was not required to go through chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Hence, this is Jackson did not consent to having this treatment however did start on a highly fiber-based diet including lots of water. Nobody really wants to blame in this situation however I think that Dr. Lowell out shows to follow the more rule utilitarian way of dealing with this issue in abiding by what the patient wants where is pronouncing her mental instability as cause for taking over the power of attorney on her medical decisions. It really is one person's decision on which serious morality they choose to go by however ethically most doctors do Trent tend to prefer the rule utilitarian him because it does coincide most of the time with the rules of society and the rules of their practice.

Nobody can ever say whether the decision that the doctor made was moral or not, but everyone can realize that it is the person’s choice to pick whatever seems fit for him or her top do. This is exactly what happened in the case of Mrs. Jackson and Mr. Lowell. Is the doctor able to , or not able to, accuse his patient mental instability to go about the treatment as he sees fit. Is this an invasion of the patient’s wants and desire for a certain way of treatment? Or does the doctor have moral rights to do anything and everything even though it is against the patient’s wishes. What do you think?





Works Cited Page:

Alexander, Larry. "Deontological Ethics."Stanford University. Stanford University, 21 Nov. 2007. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .

Hooker, Brad. "Rule Consequentialism."Stanford University. Stanford University, 31 Dec. 2003. Web. 12 Mar. 2014. .

Mappes, Thomas A., and David DeGrazia.Biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2001. Print.

"RULE-UTILITARIANISM." RULE-UTILITARIANISM. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Mar. 2014. .

"Sarvodaya." Sarvodaya. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Mar. 2014. .

Jason and Robert Scott. Bioethics Lecture. Tempe: ASU, 2001. Print.


Return to 123HelpMe.com