Global Trade
Countries whose exports involve a high proportion of primary products are generally disadvantaged from global trade regimes. Many developing countries are disadvantaged from any kind of trade which involved primary exports. The global trade regime favors those countries whose exports mainly consist of secondary products. Many developed countries have formed various trade restrictions that do not favor the trade of primary products. Some of these restrictions include taxes, export bans, supervised exports and even regulated exports. Some of the bans on exports that have been imposed by countries include the trade of fishery products, wildlife and even certain species of animals and plants
The restrictions of the trade of the primary products come in form of imposition of taxes. The taxes come in different forms which include ad valorem tax, specific tax and even progressive tax. The high tax rates act as a form of discouragement to the traders prevented from exporting primary products. The value of the products is very low as compared to the imposed taxes. Another form of regulation of trade is the imposition of policies which do not favor exports such as introduction of quotas and requirements of licensing. The volume of trade of the primary goods is limited by the quotas and this has a negative effect on the gross domestic product. In the long run, the economic growth of the developed countries is slowed by lack of income (Das, 2004).
To sum up, the developed countries have enacted legislation which is meant to supervise any form of trade that involves the primary products. The supervisory programs are inform of tariffs which are controlled by the developed countries. This means that there is tariff escalation a...
... middle of paper ...
...s will ensure that the economies of the developing countries grow. The tax restrictions should be removed to enhance the trade of the primary products. The removal of these trade policies will also ensure that the countries have increased revenue collection hence tremendous increase of the gross domestic products. In case the trade regimes remain unchanged, the developing countries will have poor economic improvements hence manipulation from the developed countries.
References
DAS, D. K., 2004. Regionalism in global trade. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
GOMORY, R. E., & BAUMOL, W. J.,2000. Global trade and conflicting national interests.
Cambridge; MIT Press.
HELPMAN, E.,2011. Understanding global trade. Cambridge, Mass, Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press.
HEPPLE, B. A.,2005. Labor laws and global trade. Oxford, Hart.
Office of Industries, U.S. International Trade Commission.(2009).Export controls: an overview of their use, economic effects, and treatment in the global trading system. Retrieved from United States International Trade Commission http://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/working_papers/ID-23.pdf
The United States has for over two centuries been involved in the growing world economy. While the U.S. post revolutionary war sought to protect itself from outside influences has since the great depression and world war two looked to break trade restrictions. The United States role in the global economy has grown throughout the 20th century and as a result of several historical events has adopted positions of both benefactor and dependent. The United States trade policy has over time shifted from isolationist protectionism to a commitment to establishing world-wide free trade. Free trade enterprise has developed and grown through organizations such as the WTO and NAFTA. The U.S. in order to obtain its free trade desires has implemented a number of policies that can be examined for both their benefits and flaws. Several trade policies exist as options to the United States, among these fair trade and free trade policies dominate the world economic market. In order to achieve economic growth the United States has a duty to maintain a global trade policy that benefits both domestic workers and industry. While free trade gives opportunities to large industries and wealthy corporate investors the American worker suffers job instability and lower wages. However fair trade policies that protect America’s workers do not help foster wide economic growth. The United States must then engage in economic trade policies that both protect the United States founding principles and secure for tomorrow greater economic stability.
These countries should consider embracing free trade in order to fully benefit in many areas for their economy. There are several pros and cons to consider regarding free trade. Free trade fully removes any hassles of taxes and other government restrictions that limit international trading opportunities. Free trade vastly improves upon the economic wellbeing of all nations involved in international trading. Since free trade also allows each nation involved to specialize and create specific commodities, free trade can run efficiently and inexpensively compared to other complicated
Slaves and slave trade has been an important part of history for a very long time. In the years of the British thirteen colonies in North America, slaves and slave trade was a very important part of its development. It even carried on to almost 200 years of the United States history. The slave trade of the thirteen colonies was an important part of the colonies as well as Europe and Africa. In order to supply the thirteen colonies efficiently through trade, Europe developed the method of triangular trade. It is referred to as triangular trade because it consists of trade with Africa, the thirteen colonies, and England. These three areas are commonly called the trades “three legs.”
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
This sort of arrangement not only eliminates hurdles to trade but promote foreign investment as well, not giving room to economies for making use of import tariffs to safeguard their rising industries or their farmers from abundances of inexpensive imports. This trade agreement also contains extra guidelines on investment that poses a possible threat to poor publics' access to public services.
And even though the tariff barriers have been reduced significantly, but the other barriers still exist. The developing nations have argued that the protectionist trading policies of developed nations is being an obstacle against the industrialization of many developing nations. Accordingly, developing nations have sought a new international. trading system with improved access to the market of developed nations. Some of the problems that the developing nations faced have been unstable export markets. Deterioration of terms of trade, and limited access to the market of developed.
In order for international trade to work well, governments must allow the world market to determine how goods are sold, manufactured and traded for all to economically prosper. While all nations may have the capability to produce any goods or services needed by their population, it is not possible for all nations to have a comparative advantage for producing a good due to natural resources of the country or other available resources needed to produce a good or service. The example of trading among states comprising the United States is an example of how free trade works best without the interve...
Free trade can be defined as the free access of the market by individuals without any restriction or any trade barriers that can obstruct the trade process such as taxes, tariffs and import quotas. Free trade in its own way unites and brings people together. Most individuals love the concept of free trade because it gives them the ability to move freely and interact in the market. The whole idea of free trade is that it lowers the price for goods and services by promoting competition. Domestic producers will no longer be able to rely on government law and other forms of assistance, including quotas which essentially force citizens to buy from them. The producers will have to enter the market and strive into to obtain profit.
There are also many consequences of adverse terms of trade internationally. High costs of debt servicing, even with a greater quantity of export are required to pay back the same amount of foreign debt. Also, falling export receipts can cause current account deficits, which could lead to increased borrowing. Adverse terms of trade reduce the country’s ability to afford much needed imports, which become more expensive. In dealing with illegal crops it may seem attractive to growers, such as cocaine in South America. The worst thing that can lead to long term depletion of resources is the incentive to export more primary products to compensate for lower export prices.
Firstly, what should be noted here is that international trade has been providing different benefits for firms as they may expand in different new markets and raise productivity by adopting different approaches. Given that nowadays marketplace is more dynamic and characterized by an interdependent economy, the volume of international trade has grown substantially in recent years, reducing the barriers to international trade. However, after experiencing the economic crisis that took its toll in 2008 many countries adopted a different approach in terms of trade barriers by introducing higher tariffs in order to protect domestic firms from foreign competition (Hill). Secondly, in order to better understand the implications of the political arguments for trade it is essential to highlight the main instruments of trade policy (See appendix 1).
After the failed International Trade Organization, Rodrik discusses the Bretton Woods Agreement, the transition from the General Agreement on Tariffs and T...
Krugman, P.R. (1987) Is free trade passé? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 131-144. Retrieved from http://dipeco.economia.unimib.it/Persone/Gilli/food%20for%20thinking/simple%20general%20readings%20on%20economics/Is%20Free%20Trade%20Passe.pdf
Globalisation has been one of the most significant developments of the last half century, and issues such as trade and international commerce have become increasingly important. In consequence, problems such as poverty, unfair wages and poor working conditions in third world countries have been drawn to the attention of consumers (Hayes and Moore, 2007). This is a growing global issue which cannot be ignored by anyone concerned about the problems in developing countries. Free trade and Fair Trade have both been offered as solutions to these issues.
Moreover, international trade can be more effective in reducing poverty than outright aid in which trade can help any country become self-sufficient, rather than relying on foreign assistance. However, there are, many disparities within the present global trade system that work against poor countries. That is regulated by a set of rules created by governments over the years. In general, poor countries don't have access to developed countries’ markets because of the barriers of trade and agricultural. It’s difficult for poor countries, because of trade barriers, to sell their products abroad and develop their living conditions. While free trade benefits everyone, governments sometimes aim to protect their goods and markets by providing subsidies to local rules and producers, or creating barriers like tariffs and quotas. This particular practice is known as Protectionism; which can be identified as the economic policies and procedures of controlling trade between states...