Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
shakespeare elizabethan theatre
shakespeare elizabethan theatre
Analysis of Shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: shakespeare elizabethan theatre
Meanings of “Sex without Love” by Sharon Olds Poets often times share their opinions through their poems. It is not always easily understood. Poets use metaphors, similes, and play with their words to show how they feel about a certain situation. In “Sex without Love” by Sharon Olds, a lot of this comes into play. Sharon Olds is not incredibly fond of those who have sex without love. This, one can easily figure by the first line in her poem, “How do they do it, the ones who make love/ without love?” Throughout the poem, we can see how she feels, such as in line five where she refers to those in the act as “steak”; she could be trying to make them out to be just a two pieces of meat; using one another for pleasure. She then uses a simile and says, “Wet as the/ children at birth whose mothers are going to/ give them away.” (Olds 6-8) In these lines, she is referring to the babies that can be conceived in the act of sex without love that mean little to these two people, so they are just given up right at birth. With this, the reader can also see that she thinks this act is irresponsible and can result in a mistake. When Sharon says, “How do they come to the/ come to the come to the God come to the/ still waters, and not love/ the one who came there with them”(8-11), one can see she is also …show more content…
In “Sex without Love”, from the beginning the reader can see that Olds is not very fond sex without love, but looking closer into the poem the reader can see that it intrigues her. She even seems to tip her hat to those who can have sex without love. Though she shows fascination in those who have sex without love, she still makes it clear that she just would not be able to do it and does not usually like when others are involved in this act. In a short poem, Olds finds a way to use metaphors, similes, and much more to show how she
Love and Lust in Play-By-Play, Sex without Love, and Junior Year Abroad. Lust is an incredibly strong feeling that can prove to be almost uncontrollable, leading it to commonly be mistaken for love. Due to the relative closeness of these emotions, both are often confused, and even when one is in love he or she does not recognize it. Many think that love just comes knocking on one's door and one will know when it does, but they don't realize that for love to occur, a relationship has to be worked out.
“We make love and the dry sheets crackle in blue sparks” (25). This was clearly a reference to a sexual encounter by the main persona in the poem. “Water slides vein by vein over the face of stone” (25). This is the physical act of weeping by the main character. At this point, I do not feel like the author has conveyed anything significant, but that is when I noticed something interesting. The author just described two very intense and opposite emotions in quick succession; sex, which is an emotionally uplifting experience, and then weeping, a form of emotion that occurs in extreme distress. The act of sex could not prevent the main persona from feeling piercing sadness immediately after the act, a sadness which pushes the main character to the point of
One of the characteristics of Sharon Olds' poems is she likes to focus on bodily experience. And inside this poem, Sharon Olds frequently uses similes to help the audience to imagine the actual events of sex. For example in line 2, Olds uses "Beautiful as dancers" to describe the beauty of making love, but at the same time she also questions how people can do such a beautiful thing with someone whom they are not in love with. Another simile the poet uses in line 6, 7 and 8, "As wet as the children at birth whose mothers are going to give them away," and line 11, 12 and 13, "light rising slowly as steam off their joined skin...
In the book, “On the Meaning of Sex” J. Budziszewski talks about the meaning of sex. Budziszewski states that the issue of sex is one of the most important issues in our culture since the sexual revolution. Budziszewski opens the book by restating a conversation he once had with a student about the Book, “Brave New World.” The student states that the people are revolting and disgusting. Budziszewski is delighted by this statement. He believes that the student and himself are on the same page. Budziszewski responds to the student by agreeing and saying that there needs to be some meaning to sex. However; the student replies by saying, that the manner in which babies are “born” in the brave new world is disgusting and that sex doesn’t necessarily
Stated in the first metaphor of the poem, “How do they do it, the ones who make love without love? Beautiful as dancers, gliding over each other like ice skaters” (lines 1-3) captures an image of two lovers gliding over one another like an abstract artistic painting in a simile. The cold atmosphere indicates the disdain detachment between the lovers during the experience. In modern society, many believe in the “no strings attached” method as part of a liberation for one’s self. Yet, Olds creates a paradox in the imagery by describing the people “red as steak, wine, wet as the children at birth whose mothers are going to five them away” (lines 6-8). In literal concept, the images display a child birth after an eventful sexual experience. When a child enters the world, it comes responsibility many young adults don’t care to handle, thus creating a narcissistic for the younger generation. Nevertheless, the syntax, form, and tone are broken down as Olds further answers her frustrations to society. A tonal shift reverted any ambiguities about these faceless sexual beings by describing them as “the ones who will not accept a false Messiah, love the priest instead of the God” (lines 15-16). Without the great
In the situation of Georgina there is a sentient need for a creative and rewarding relationship. This physical-psychological desire, however, does not have love as the basis of a long-term, deep emotional relationship between two individuals (Goldman, Philosophy of Sex, pp. 78-79). It is more the bodily desire for the body of another that dominates her mental life (Goldman, Philosophy of Sex, p. 76). In the Georgina's need for...
James Dickey illustrates the pleasures and guilt that comes with an affair. The rush one gets with the fear of getting caught (Dickey 351). The narrator in the poem seems to have no problem with the affair because he clearly states he will call again if he can, proving that he is barely fazed by not remaining faithful. It is clear that both the narrator and the mistress are pressed for time in this sick lust affair they are having. Both equally nervous about being caught by a significant other or someone, but they don’t seem to care enough to end their relationship. In this case, there seems to be no act of fidelity because the narrator says he’ll see her next week (Dickey
Love plays an important role in most physical and emotional relationships. Love is a word that can prove difficult to define or even compare to other emotions. This is due to the diversity of meaning and the complexity of the emotion itself. Everyone has been in love at least once before and has gotten a taste of all the good and bad things that come with it. Christina Rossetti’s “Song” presents some of the good parts of love while Philip Larkin’s “Talking in Bed” shows us some of the bad parts of love. Larkin’s poem presents a failing relationship where communication has failed between a couple and things are getting more and more difficult. Rossetti’s poem presents a wholly different view on love; it is told from the viewpoint of someone talking to his or her lover about what said lover should do after the speaker dies. The love between them seems better, more powerful and good. The two poems also present wholly different attitudes towards “The End,” whether that is the end of life or the end of the relationship. Larkin presents the end as something dark and sad, difficult to cope with. Rossetti, on the other hand, talks about the end as just another beginning, a chance to start over in a new world. Finally, the two poems represent remembrance in different ways. Larkin’s presents memory as something extremely important while Rossetti implies that it does not matter whether we remember or not.
At the start, the first stanza of the poem is full of flattery. This is the appeal to pathos. The speaker is using the mistress's emotions and vanity to gain her attention. By complimenting her on her beauty and the kind of love she deserves, he's getting her attention. In this first stanza, the speaker claims to agree with the mistress - he says he knows waiting for love provides the best relationships. It feels quasi-Rogerian, as the man is giving credit to the woman's claim, he's trying to see her point of view, he's seemingly compliant. He appears to know what she wants and how she should be loved. This is the appeal to ethos. The speaker seems to understand how relationships work, how much time they can take, and the effort that should be put forth. The woman, if only reading stanza one, would think her and the speaker are in total agreement.
In romantic words, the poet expresses how much she does think of love. She state it clear that she will not trade love for peace in times of anguish.
"Sex without Love" is a poem by Sharon Old, who states in the opening line "How do they do it, the ones who make love without love?" It starts out with judging those, who have sex outside of having feeling for one another. It describes the sex in the third line as without feeling more as a techniques, which is describe "beautiful as dancers.. over each other like ice skaters." Sex without love to the author is described more as an act, which is performed instead of two people in love, who sex is in love not because of the act but instead of the love of the person. The author seems to climax in the literal sense at line nine : come to the Come to the … then God comes in picture after the act is done. Judgment and sin is the mood of this poem of how two people can commit an act of a heart and soul without disappointed God.
In the poem "To his Coy Mistress" Andrew Marvell tells a subtle and valid argument as to why women should fall in love with him. He attempts this through form and imagery and through manipulatative reasoning. Marvell, a well-known politician, held office in Cromwell's government and represented Hull to Paraliament during the Restoration. Sharon Olds' poem "Sex without Love," uses imagery to question how sex is fullfilling without love. Sharon was born in San Francisco on Novemeber 19, 1942. She earned a Bachelor's Degree at Stanford University and a PhD at Columbia University.
The Broke Female The 60’s was certainly a time of women’s curiosity and venture outside of the norm “homemaker” role. Women not only found pleasure in the world, but in themselves as a whole and as a woman. Sex and the Single Girl by Helen Gurley Brown played an important role here as her intent was to guide women - or more specifically the single woman - in her pursuit of independence and pleasure. Sex and the Single Girl most definitely lead the readers on to believe that it was to empower women; even to break away from the norm and advocate the unattached female. My response will focus on the contradictory nature the guidebook, and other literature like Cosmopolitan, create when advising a woman to do and be something on the one hand while having an underlying message on the other.
He is simply mocking this idea that people hold about love, that this man can actually fall in love with this woman after three days, and only keep loving her if things don’t change at all. He is trying to say that yes, you love someone as they are but if things change, your feeling shouldn’t change either. There is no shift in the tone of the poem, the tone of mockery, and humor, stays within in the play along with the idea of this man only finding interest in this woman for her beauty and nothing more(“Had it any been but she And that very face, There had been at least ere this A dozen dozen in her place” (stanza
On a literal level, this poem is bashing true love. This is made apparent throughout the poem. The speaker states things like “listen to them laughing-it’s an insult” and “it’s obviously a plot behind the human race’s back”. It is apparent that the speaker doesn’t have a positive opinion about true love. They even so far as to claim that it an outrage to justice and that it “disrupts our painstakingly erected principles”. This poem is about how true love is just illusion; especially to those people that never find it.