Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tricky questions marine insurance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tricky questions marine insurance
Marine insurance is mandated with covering the loss or damage of ships, terminals, cargo, as well as other transport or cargo by which there is transference of property either acquired or held between both points of destination and origin. The terms actual total loss and constructive total loss are used to differentiate the degree of proof where cargo or a vessel has been lost and they are defined as follows;
Actual Total Loss: occurs where the cost of repair or damages either equal or exceed the value of the property.
Constructive Total Loss: Occurs where then the cost of salvage, added to the cost of repair either equal or exceed the property’s value.
On the other hand, proximate cause is defined as the ‘dominant cause’ of the incurred loss. It can also be defined as the cause that has the most significant impact, which brings about the loss under a first party policy when two or perils that are more independent operate concurrently to result in a loss. However, courts employ a set of proximate cause rules in order to determine causation disputes especially when a policy states that it covers or excludes those losses “caused by” an insured peril, and there is more than one peril at play. The significance of the proximity cause is to determine whether the policy should cover the loss as resulted from the insured peril. From this information, it is safe to state that the insured is often the beneficiary of such a suit. This is because it is sometimes hard to prove that the peril was not the dominant factor that caused the loss. For instance in the case of Kastor Navigation Co Ltd & Another Vs Axa Global Risks (U.K) Ltd & others, it was hard for them to prove that the fire was not the dominant peril that caused the sinking of the s...
... middle of paper ...
...03, September 12). Marine Insurance Act 1906. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Edw7/6/41
Marine insurance. (1998, June 23). Answers. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://www.answers.com/topic/marine-insurance
REPORT ON CLAIM SETTLEMENT.doc - Scribd. (n.d.). Kastor V AGF litigation. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/182277177/REPORT-ON-CLAIM-SETTLEMENT-doc
Related Content. (n.d.). KASTOR NAVIGATION CO. LTD. v. AGF MAT. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=152902 cs.colby.edu. (n.d.). Kastor V. AGF. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://cs.colby.edu/courses/F07/cs397/labs/lab02/colonyPictures/IMG_0108.ppm haberciniz.biz. (n.d.). SYNOPSIS 1LLR [2003] page 296 Case:- Kastor V. AGF. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://haberciniz.biz/canl%c4%b1-ma%c3%a7-skorlar%c4%b1-2009-11-17.html
"Summary of the Decision." Landmark Cases Of The U.S Supreme Court. Street Law, Inc, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2013. .
"Schenck v. United States. Baer v. Same.." LII. Cornell University Law school, n.d. Web. 6 Jan. 2014. .
Washington Law Review, Vol. 86, Issue 4 (December 2011), pp. 841-874 Barnum, Jeffrey C. 86 Wash. L. Rev. 841 (2011)
SHELLEY v. KRAEMER. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 23 March 2014. .
America”. The Georgetown Law Journal. 80.95 (1991): 95-129. Georgetown Law Library. Web. 16 Jun 2014
"MORSE v. FREDERICK." Cornell University Law School. N.p., 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 10 Dec. 2013.
Koppel, N & Ashby Jones (2011, January, 12). Early Legal Issue: Where to Try Case. retrieved February 2 2014, from Wall Street Journal Web Site: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405274870451590457607624427344507
"Summary of United States V. Emerson." FindLaw: Cases and Codes. Thomson Reuters. Web. 29 May 2010. .
Ricky Brown, Et al, v. State of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223, 65 USLW 2355 (1996)
Oct 1993. Retrieved November 18, 2010. Vol. 79. 134 pages (Document ID: 0747-0088) Published by American Bar Association
Et Al. United States Court of Appeals Eleventh Circuit. N.d. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 10 May 2014.
GANNETT CO. v. DEPASQUALE. (n.d.).The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved April 7, 2014, from http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1978/1978_77_1301
Rousmaniere, Peter. “Facing a tough situation.” Risk & Insurance 17.7 (June 2006): 24-25. Expanded Academic ASAP. Web. 23 March 2011.
Defense." Southern Illinois University Law Journal 30.(2006): 533-571. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 2 Apr. 2014.
Keating Daniel. The University Of Chicago Law Review. 1986, Vol 53, Issue 1, p 258.