Marbury V Madison

1352 Words3 Pages

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Marbury v. Madison has been hailed as one of the most significant cases that the Supreme Court has ruled upon. In this paper, I will explain the origins and background in the case, discuss the major Constitutional issues it raised, and outline the major points of the courts decision. I will also explain the significance of this key decision.

Origins and background of the case

In the late 1700's, John Adams was President. Adams was a member of the Federalist Party. The Federalists were in control of the Congress. Adams and other Federalists were Pro-British and the Republican Party was Pro-French. Thomas Jefferson led the Republicans. Federalists were worried that the influx of French into the country could become a powerful voting block. The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by the Federalist controlled Congress to deal with this problem. The first of the laws was the Naturalization Act. This act required that aliens be residents for 14 years instead of 5 years before they became eligible for U.S. citizenship. Congress then passed the Alien Act, authorizing the President to deport aliens "dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States" during peacetime. The third law, the Alien Enemies Act, allowed the wartime arrest, imprisonment and deportation of any alien subject to an enemy power.

The last of the laws, the Sedition Act, declared that any treasonable activity, including the publication of "any false, scandalous and malicious writing," was a high misdemeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment. The public was outraged and felt that this was a violation of their rights and that the government was becoming too overbearing.

The Alien and Sedition Acts were a major reaso...

... middle of paper ...

...e Constitution.

Marshall's decision firmly establishes that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that the Supreme Court is to strike down an act of Congress that is inconsistent with the Constitution. If a law written by the legislature conflicts with the Constitution, the law is "null and void."

Bibliography

Primary Source

Hamilton, Alexander. "Federalist Papers 78" June 14, 1788

Marbury v. Madison 1 Cranch 137 (1803).

Secondary Sources

Brainard, Rick. "The Judicial Mind of John Marshall: Nationalism"

http://www.history1700s.com/page1757.shtml

Barrus, Roger."Remembering John Marshall" 24 September 2005

The Washington Times

Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Alien.html

United States Constitution. Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Constitution.html

Show More
Related

  • How Did John Adams Respond To The Alien And Sedition Act Dbq

    931 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Alien and Sedition acts hurt John Adams’ image of a patriot and his chances of a another presidency. The Alien and Sedition Acts were signed into law by John Adams in 1798. They, among other

    Read More

  • Gibbons V. Ogden (1824)

    969 Words  | 2 Pages

    Certain things became apparent to Marshall. The Constitution did give the federal government complete control over the nation’s commerce. (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3) Also, the Federal Law, according to the Constitution, was the supreme law of the land. (Article 6, Clause 2) Marshall, a Federalist, had always supported a strong central government. However, issues were arising in other parts of the country that would make him consider any decision he made further.

    Read More

  • John Adams A Good Or Bad President

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    These acts came about in response to the French’s foreign threat. These brand- new laws included the authority to deporting immigrants and making harder for them to vote. The most controversial law was that of the sedition act. In a way, this Act prohibited public opposition towards the government. Fines and imprisonment was the fate so to speak of those who "write, print, utter, or publish . . . any false, scandalous and malicious writing" about the government. The introduction of the sedition act contravened with the first amendment of the constitution where individuals were granted the right to religion, assembly, press, petition, and speech. This proves that John Adams wasn’t looking out for the wellbeing of others, and made it seem as if there was something to hide by making it illegal to speak out against the

    Read More

  • John Adams Foreign Policy

    777 Words  | 2 Pages

    That meant that President Adams’ success would only create more divide in his party and country (Smith 20). Subsequently during the Quasi War, President Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798 (Gevinson). The idea of the acts was to suppress any French sympathizers in America and contain the growth of Republicans (Magill 48). Immigrants mainly became Republicans.

    Read More

  • How Did John Marshall Influence The Federal Government

    468 Words  | 1 Pages

    Marshall made a landmark decision in the MARBURY V. MADISON case, that would define the boundries between the executive and judical branches of the American government. Marbury had been appointed as a Justice of the Peace by John Adams, but his commission was not delivered before Thomas Jefferson assumed the Presidency in 1801. Marbury filed a petition with the Supreme Court to force the Secretary of

    Read More

  • Dbq Alien And Sedition Acts

    1488 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ll was politically motivated became obvious when the House voted to extend the act from its original one year proposed to the expiration of John Adams term, March 3, 1801. The victory of the Republicans, who ran on a platform of anti-sedition, in the election of 1800 showed that Americans were much more interested in personal freedom that what Federalist thought. It is understandable that in time of war some positions need to be taken to assure the countries well being; as seen in later wars when the Japanese were sent to camps in the west coast. But when these acts of concern start to eliminate certain right and freedoms or violate the constitution; they should be abolished. Thankfully, the American people have the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights to bring them back from the edge, and to force those positions in office governing for themselves into accountability.

    Read More

  • Homework Six

    842 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison was a Supreme Court case to resolve the dispute of Marbury’s appointment in 1803. Before he left presidential office, John Adams made a set of last minute appointments. According to these, he named Federalists to the most of the positions. Among others, he appointed William Marbury “as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia but failed to deliver Marbury’s commission before midnight” (Boyer 226). Marbury needed the notice of appointment; however, new secretary of state Republican John Madison refused to send it to him. As a result, Marbury asked the Supreme Court for help. The Chief of Justice, John Marshall, went back to available documents to find out what he was supposed to do. Finally, he presented that although Marbury has the right to the appointment, according to Constitution, no one has the right to force Madison to deliver Marbury’s commission.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Tenth Amendment

    1240 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the Tenth Amendment in the Bill of Rights: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Though last in the Bill of Rights, it is one of the most powerful and ever changing in interpretation over the course of America’s history. Some historical events that altered its meaning include the Civil War, The Civil Right’s Movement, and even modern event’s like the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage. In this paper I will discuss how the Tenth amendment has a large effect in both America’s history, but also how it is now portrayed America’s present.

    Read More

  • The Power Struggle of the States and Federal Government in the United States

    1531 Words  | 4 Pages

    The evolution of power gained by the Federal government can be seen in the McCuloch versus Maryland (1819) case. This case des...

    Read More

  • The Fourteenth Amendment

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    The opposing argument serves as a perfect gateway to the topic of relationship between Federal and State government. In the United States, the Supremacy Clause serves...

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson

    738 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Jefferson work diligently with congress to change the Alien Acts to have a more relaxed naturalization for only requiring five years of residency achieve United States citizenship, instead of the previous fourteen years.

    Read More

  • James Madison's Failures

    958 Words  | 2 Pages

    During his entire life, James Madison, who is one of the founding fathers, contributed many dedications to the States, especially when creating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. As the fourth president of the U.S, he consciously chose to create a new model of presidential power that he thought would fit better with the system of the separation of powers after seeing “the danger overwrought executive power poses to republican constitutionalism” (Kleinerman). Despite of having such good intention, some of his actions led the country through some significant suffers.

    Read More

  • John Marshall's Effect on the American Judicial System

    1672 Words  | 4 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to discuss how Chief Justice John Marshall affected the American Judicial System. The reader will therefore first find a brief biography of John Marshall. Then the paper will explain in detail the origins of the Judicial Power to subsequently...

    Read More

  • Alien And Sedition Acts

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    These acts were, of no questions asked, surly constitutional. The Federalist Party presented these acts, later consequently passed by Congress, because they were and fair and just laws in accordance to the nation at that time. For the sake of argument, the nation and government was very inexperienced, and did not know what to expect in their near future. John Adams became the second president of the United States of America, subsequently, having to accept many challenges and responsibilities to fulfill the job in office. He had the task of making sure that the newly founded nation kept running smooth. That is a big burden if there are activities going on in the country that one has no control, nor knowledge of (i.e. foreigners coming into the nation and starting trouble by disrupting the form of government, or having radicals trying to protest and perturb the running government in office-Federalists, at this time). John Adams was smart enough to realize the significance of these factors. Thus, taking his duty of President of USA seriously, he, along with the Federalist-controlled Congress, took action to protect the new country. Hence, were the creation and passing of the four, debate-causing laws (Naturalization, Alien, Alien Enemies, and Sedition Acts).

    Read More

  • Race and Supreme Court Decisions

    1896 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1803, the decision in Marbury v Madison held that the Supreme Court had the ability to practice the process of judicial review. With this ruling, the Court gave itself the power to deem legislation constitutional or unconstitutional. With this bolstered power, the Supreme Court made numerous landmark decisions throughout the 19th and during the first half of the 20th centuries. The Supreme Court’s power of judicial review played an integral role in shaping post-bellum racial laws and attitudes. In the cases of Plessey v. Ferguson and Brown v. The Board of Education the Supreme Court invoked judicial review to assess racial segregation policies as they related to the 14th Amendment. Both Plessey and Brown are landmark cases because they reflected the social climate of their respective time periods, because both cases had immediate impact upon civil rights law and everyday life in America, and because both cases affected basic interpretation of the Constitution.

    Read More

More about Marbury V Madison

Open Document