Many Philippinos are Mothering from a Distance

1090 Words3 Pages

Due to the Philippine's lack of economic growth and lack of quality jobs in the past 40 years, an increasing number of Filipina migrants are mothering their children from a distance. According to Rhacel Salazar Parrenas, a Professor at USC, the term "mothering from a distance" has damaging ramifications both for the mothers who leave and the children who are left behind. In order to provide for their families, they must leave them behind in the Philippines and take advantage of the greater labor market opportunities in other countries of Asia, Europe, and the United States. One of the largest suppliers of independent female labor migrants in the world, the Philippines has seen the formation of a growing number of female-headed transnational families. According to the Commission on Filipinos Overseas an estimated 10% of the Philippine population or around 9 million or so people are living or working overseas as temporary workers. Based on research that has been conducted between 2000-2008, there is an estimated 1.3 million workers in the United States in which 70% are women, most of whom are mothers who have left 9 million children, under the age of 18, behind (Commission on Filipinos Overseas).
Society has established that emotional labor of women is expected to nurture the well-being of family as well as work. But with the geographical distance between mother and children, transnational mothers face a challenge to provide her children with the emotional care that they need. If the mothers are expected to remain responsible for the emotional labor of their families, children in these households are prone to what is known as the "care deficit", meaning someone else besides the mother has to be responsible for the emotional care....

... middle of paper ...

...useholds have managed to adjust to family separation, aided by regular communication. Caring for children remains to be a family responsibility. Among extended family members, grandmothers emerged as alternative caregivers in transnational households. While the study demonstrated that transnational households are better off economically than non-migrant households, transnational households are not significantly more likely to build up more savings compared to non-migrant households. The economic disadvantage of non-migrant households and how it constrains investments in children’s education and health cannot be overemphasized. Basic public goods, notably education and health services, must be accessible to all children to lessen the incentive factor that push Filipino parents to leave so their children may have a better chance at success and a more comfortable life.

Open Document