More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on employee engagement
Employee engagement sies college of management studies working paper series
Essays on employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction The employee engagement has become a hot topic of discussion in the corporate world. There is no single accepted definition of engagement or recognised approach for measuring or raising it. HRM Practitioners have involved in quite a lot of study to understand employee engagement and its impact on the performance of the organisation. According to them, employee engagement is a level of commitment and involvement of employees towards their organisation and its value. An engaged employee works with his/her colleagues to improve their productivity within their job, for the ultimate benefit of the organisation. This paper critically reviews MacLeod Report (2009), ‘Engaging for Success’ and analysis it’s suitability as an engagement model for the organisations to adapt. Also, this paper suggests an alternative engagement model, which can be applied and adopted by the organisation for achieving their strategic objectives. Employee Engagement The employee engagement is a relatively new term in the corporate world. Due to the global nature of work and diversity of workforce, it has become a key part of competitive advantage for many organisations. The engagement at work was conceptualized by Kahn (1990:694) as the “harnessing of organisational members’ selves to their work roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively and emotionally during role performances”. The other related construct to engagement in organisational behaviour is the notion of flow. Csikszentmihalyi (1975, 1990) defines flow as the ‘holistic sensation’ that people feel when they act with total involvement. Thus employee engagement is the level of commitment and involvement, which an employee has towards ... ... middle of paper ... ...selid, M.A. 1995. ‘The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 38, pp635-670. Kahn, W.A. (1990), ‘Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 33, pp692-724 MacLeod, D. and Clarke, N. (2009), Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Osterman P (1994), ‘How Common is Workplace Transformation and How can we Explain who Adopts it? Results from a National Survey’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review,47. Pil, F.K. and McDuffie, J.P. (1996), ‘The adoption of high involvement work practices’, Industrial Relations,Vol 35:pp423-455 Vodafone Site: http://www.vodafone.com/start/responsibility/employees.html
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Boston, MA: Pearson Sivarethinamohan, R. R., & Aranganathan, P. P. (2011). Determinants of employee engagement
It impacts the hospital’s prosperity and productivity immensely and if employee engagement is strong it results in a more productive workforce, higher job satisfaction and moral, higher retention, better skilled staff, lower absentee rates and better patient loyalty and satisfaction. Tameside hospital has aspects of their approach to staff engagement that have high performance rates (which they need to maintain) and aspects that were lower in performance which need drastic improvements to have a more productive hospital. Progressive staff engagement and development not only benefits the staff at the hospital but leads to a better experience and service for patients, which ultimately benefits the stakeholders and the organisation as a
Rich, B., Lepine, J., & Crawford, E. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Noe, Raymond A., et al. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010. Print.
[Author removed at request of original publisher]. (2016, March 22). Human Resource Management - The Costs of Turnover. Retrieved August 28, 2017, from
MacLeod and Clarke state that employee engagement has a lot in common with phenomena like commitment, organisational citizenship behaviour, job involvement and job satisfaction but that employee engagement has a deeper meaning behind it than all of these terms added up. Employee engagement goes in both ways, from the employee to the organisation and from the organisation to the employee. Employee engagement is described as “a workplace approach designed to ensure that employees are committed to their organisation’s goals and values, motivated to contribute to organisational success, and are able at the same time to enhance their own sense of well-being […].” It is also stated that a universal definition of employee engagement is non-existent but that is often discussed whether employee engagement is an attitude, a behaviour or an outcome. Attitude refers to the feeling of pride and loyalty towards the organisation you work for and the tasks that you are assigned in that company.
Noe, Raymond A., John R. Hollenbeck, Barry Gerhart, and Patrick M. Wright. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010. Print.
Employee engagement, a term devised by Gallup research group, is viewed as an important management tool for any company who wants to be an effective and productive organization. Researches have shown that employee can contribute positively to the organization vision and goal when a company engage them effectively. The employee will also feel more passionate about their work and have a sense of belonging.
Definition. Schaufeli’s (as cited in Truss, Delbridge, Alfes, Shantz, & Soane, 2014, p. 26) ideas on employee engagement can be explained by using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Job demands and availability or lack of resources, both job and personal, either contribute to or deter employee engagement, this is illustrated by the JD-R (Truss et al., 2014). On the positive side, according to Truss et al. (2014) job and personal resources “foster engagement in terms of vigor (energy), dedication (persistence) and absorption (focus)” (p. 26). An employee who has the resources needed to do their job is better equipped to do the job and thereby better able to perform their job (Truss et al., 2014). Employees who are better able to meet job
Executives often wonder how engaged their employees are in their organization. However, isn’t it physically impossible to measure employee engagement? So, how can a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or even a manager evaluate their employees to understand if everyone is engaged and committed in their workforce? Employee engagement is not as simple as it sounds. Many believe that employee engagement simply means having happy employees. However, it is a much more complex issue than just happy employees. This report will look at how to motivate your employees, the positive and negative outcomes employee engagement has with engaged workers, as well as the key elements to employee engagement.
Here are some figures that display how Employee engagement practices have bolstered up the efficiency and productivity of the employees and in return have augmented the profits of the companies. According to a new meta-analysis that was conducted by the Gallup organisation amongst 1.4 million employees, the organisations that focus on employee engagement practices to a large extent have reported 22% increase in productivity. These practices even impr...
Fisher, C., Schoefeldt, L., & Shaw, J. (1996). Human resource management. (3rd Edition). Princeton, NJ: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Becker , B. and Gerhart 2001, and the impact on human resources management in the organization Performance .
A recent Gallup poll found that companies with engaged employees earned 147 percent higher profits than competitors with lower engagement rates. [Blog.customermonitor.com: Why engaged employees equal a better customer experience and more ROI